10.01.2014 Views

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cork<br />

Curraheen, Co. Cork<br />

Early Medieval Settlement Enclosure<br />

Grid Ref: W60726922 (160722/069228)<br />

SMR No: N/A<br />

Excavation Licence: 01E1209<br />

Excavation Duration/year: 2002<br />

Site Director: E. Danaher (ACS Ltd.)<br />

<strong>The</strong> site was discovered during archaeological testing in advance <strong>of</strong> road construction on a<br />

slightly elevated area <strong>of</strong> ground (20m OD), surrounded by flat marshy landscape on three<br />

sides and better agricultural land to the east and northeast.<br />

<strong>The</strong> earliest activity on site dated to the Neolithic and was comprised <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> chipped<br />

stone artefacts- including two concave scrapers and an end-scraper- in secondary contexts<br />

and two sherds <strong>of</strong> carinated bowls from a posthole/pit. A possible late Neolithic/Early Bronze<br />

Age ‘Beaker’ settlement was also identified by pits and postholes, as well as a substantial<br />

collection <strong>of</strong> Beaker pottery (c. 2300–2200 B.C.), flint debitage and a thumbnail scraper.<br />

Subsequent prehistoric activity comprised a Bronze Age pit/posthole and two Iron Age pits,<br />

one <strong>of</strong> which may have functioned as a bowl-furnace or hearth (see below).<br />

<strong>The</strong> early medieval settlement comprised a conjoined enclosure (62m by 44m), consisting <strong>of</strong><br />

a large eastern enclosure with an attached smaller western annex (16m in diameter). Part <strong>of</strong><br />

the site had been destroyed by modern agricultural disturbance, quarrying, and the<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> a (now) disused railway track (Fig. 72). Both enclosures were defined by<br />

shallow ditches backfilled with re-deposited material from related earthen banks. <strong>The</strong> ditches<br />

<strong>of</strong> the enclosures respected each other, supporting the radiocarbon results (see below) that<br />

both were contemporary with each other.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ditch <strong>of</strong> the small enclosure was V-shaped with an average width <strong>of</strong> 1m and depth <strong>of</strong><br />

0.85m. No artefacts, except for a possible hone-stone, were recovered from its fills, although<br />

an iron axe-head was recovered in topsoil overlying the upper fill <strong>of</strong> the ditch. Charcoal from<br />

the fills <strong>of</strong> the small enclosure ditch has produced calibrated dates in the seventh/ninth<br />

century (see below). This enclosure appears to have had a south-eastern entranceway<br />

(defined by two postholes), with the north-western quadrant <strong>of</strong> the larger ditch acting as its<br />

eastern boundary. <strong>The</strong>re were no occupational layers within the interior <strong>of</strong> the small<br />

enclosure apart from two pieces <strong>of</strong> flint debitage and three large postholes, interpreted as<br />

possible tethering posts for animals. Charcoal from one posthole produced a radiocarbon date<br />

falling in the sixth/seventh century (see below).<br />

<strong>The</strong> ditch <strong>of</strong> the large enclosure was 1.65m wide across the top and was 0.8m deep. Only the<br />

southern extent <strong>of</strong> this ditch survived with the northern part destroyed by modern<br />

disturbance. Two iron fragments were recovered in the fill <strong>of</strong> the large enclosure ditch. <strong>The</strong><br />

ditch was possibly re-cut along its north-western section where it bounded the eastern side <strong>of</strong><br />

the western annex. Along this section, the ditch was narrower and deeper than the other<br />

excavated parts <strong>of</strong> the large enclosure ditch, although similar in pr<strong>of</strong>ile to that <strong>of</strong> the ditch <strong>of</strong><br />

the western annex. It was suggested that this section <strong>of</strong> the large enclosure ditch was dug in<br />

such a way as to prevent animals from the western annex crossing into the main enclosure.<br />

An oval arrangement <strong>of</strong> ten postholes and an internal hearth associated with stakeholes were<br />

interpreted as the remains <strong>of</strong> a post-and-wattle oval building (8m by 6m) in the northeast<br />

quadrant <strong>of</strong> the large enclosure. Charred cereal remains <strong>of</strong> oats, barley and wheat as well as<br />

charcoal and a glass bead were recovered from deposits overlying the hearth.<br />

A cluster <strong>of</strong> post- and stakeholes were excavated 7m to the southwest <strong>of</strong> the oval building<br />

and defined the ground plan <strong>of</strong> a small square structure (4m by 4m). <strong>The</strong> small size <strong>of</strong> the<br />

structure suggests it may have functioned as an outhouse or storage unit. A number <strong>of</strong> postand<br />

stakeholes were revealed to the south and west <strong>of</strong> the oval structure. Iron objects, slag,<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!