10.01.2014 Views

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Clare<br />

beside the central hearth and a slate trial-piece was found in the habitation deposit covering<br />

the entrance passage <strong>of</strong> the building. A large burnt area marked by a thick layer <strong>of</strong> charcoalflecked<br />

soil was identified outside the northeast corner <strong>of</strong> the building and seems to have<br />

been contemporary with it.<br />

A period <strong>of</strong> abandonment between the end <strong>of</strong> the primary period <strong>of</strong> activity and the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong> the secondary feature was suggested by the presence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

turf layer that had formed over the whole surface <strong>of</strong> the original fort. <strong>The</strong> enormous<br />

secondary bank and ditch was next erected and involved the dumping <strong>of</strong> material inside and<br />

on the inner slopes <strong>of</strong> the primary bank to raise the width and height <strong>of</strong> the bank to its<br />

present form. <strong>The</strong> excavator suggested that the intention <strong>of</strong> the builders was not to create a<br />

larger enclosure but to build a motte-like structure or flat-topped mound which would have<br />

been the result had they continued to deposit gravel from the ditch outside and tip it all<br />

around the inner bank slopes in the interior. <strong>The</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> any archaeological evidence<br />

associated with this secondary structure also supports the hypothesis that this feature was<br />

never completed.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re were few finds from the site belonging to the original enclosure; a fact partly explained<br />

by the inability <strong>of</strong> the excavators to investigate close to the inner faces <strong>of</strong> the bank on the<br />

sheltered west and south-west sides as well as the enormous size <strong>of</strong> the secondary structure<br />

engulfing it. <strong>The</strong> few finds consisted <strong>of</strong> a stone trial piece, five bronze pins, a tanged stud,<br />

two hone-stones, some corroded iron objects and nails, two sherds <strong>of</strong> brownish-grey pottery<br />

and two Hiberno-Scandinavian silver coins dated to A.D. 1035 and 1070 respectively.<br />

Although no actual furnace was identified, evidence for small-scale ironworking on the site<br />

took the form <strong>of</strong> six small hemispherical lumps <strong>of</strong> slag.<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!