10.01.2014 Views

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Waterford<br />

Kill St. Lawrence, Co. Waterford<br />

Ecclesiastical Settlement<br />

Grid Ref: S61320917 (261329/109174)<br />

SMR No: WA 017-005<br />

Excavation Licence: 02E1448<br />

Excavation Duration/Year: September 2002<br />

Site Director: A. O’Connell; E. Corcoran<br />

An early ecclesiastical site in Kill St. Lawrence, excavated in advance of road realignment,<br />

revealed two concentric enclosing ditches as well as a series of external and internal ditches,<br />

pits, deposits and possible hearths/post-holes. <strong>The</strong> excavation site was directly east of the<br />

remains of the church and graveyard on a slight rise of ground at 18m OD in a generally lowlying<br />

landscape.<br />

<strong>The</strong> outer enclosure ditch had an extrapolated diameter of approximately 110m. No evidence<br />

of an internal bank was uncovered. Along the southern side of the enclosure, the ditch<br />

measured 6m wide at the top and 0.74m deep and had generally a shallow stepped profile<br />

with a flat base. Along the northern side of the enclosure, the ditch was 2.8m wide at the top<br />

and 1.38m deep and had generally steeply sloping sides and a V-shaped profile. <strong>The</strong> fills of<br />

the ditch contained occasional inclusions of charcoal. Charred material (wood species identity<br />

unknown) from the basal fill of the outer enclosing ditch returned a seventh/eighth-century<br />

date (see below).<br />

A second ditch was uncovered parallel to the outer enclosure ditch and measured 1.8m wide<br />

at the top and 0.58m deep with steeply sloping sides and a concave base. Inclusions of<br />

charcoal and five pieces of slag were recovered within its basal fill. This previously<br />

unidentified inner enclosure was concentric with the outer enclosure, and had an extrapolated<br />

diameter of 60m. No evidence of an internal bank was recovered. Two sections of the inner<br />

ditch was excavated and revealed that it measured between 1.9m-2.3m wide and 0.85m-<br />

0.96m deep and contained inclusions of charcoal and a flint flake within its fills.<br />

Settlement activity within the enclosure was suggested by the excavation of a variety of<br />

features including pits, deposits and possible hearths/post-holes. Twelve roughly sub-circular<br />

pits were excavated within the interior and had average maximum dimensions of 0.8m.<br />

Charred material was recovered from the primary fill of one of the pits and returned a<br />

fourth/sixth-century date (see below). This pit appears to pre-date the construction of the<br />

outer enclosure ditch, however this date, derived from oak charcoal, may have been<br />

subjected to the ‘old wood’ effect as it was not possible to determine whether the charred<br />

material derived from twigs or trunks of great age.<br />

Three unidentified seeds, a single fragment of charred hazel nut shell, and three fragments of<br />

burnt animal bone (either pit or sheep/goat) were recovered from the fill of another pit in the<br />

enclosure interior. Three possible hearths/post-holes with an average diameter of 0.25m were<br />

situated close together within the inner enclosure and contained charcoal-rich fills. Four<br />

irregular to sub-rectangular deposits were also excavated within the enclosure and had<br />

average dimensions of 1.3m by 1m. No evidence for burials was revealed within the<br />

enclosure.<br />

A number of features comprising two deposits, four pits and one ditch were revealed outside<br />

the enclosure ditches. <strong>The</strong> ditch was approximately one metre wide and orientated east-west.<br />

<strong>The</strong> pits were sub-circular or oval in plan and had an average diameter of 0.3m. <strong>The</strong> two<br />

deposits were sub-circular in plan and had an average diameter of 0.23m.<br />

600

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!