10.01.2014 Views

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Meath<br />

Lagore (Lagore Big td.), Co. Meath<br />

Early Medieval Crannog<br />

Grid reference: N98615284 (298619/252846)<br />

SMR No: ME038-027<br />

Excavation License No: N/A<br />

Excavation duration/Year: 1934; 1935; 1936.<br />

Site director: H. O’N. Hencken (Harvard Archaeological Expedition)<br />

Lagore crannog, Co. Meath, was first discovered in 1839, when local labourers digging a<br />

drainage ditch exposed wooden structures, huge amounts of animal bone and numerous<br />

finds of metalwork at the site. <strong>The</strong> subsequent antiquarian investigations at Lagore can safely<br />

be considered to mark the beginnings of research on Irish crannogs. <strong>The</strong> site was later<br />

excavated by the Harvard Archaeological Expedition between 1934 and 1936. <strong>The</strong><br />

stratigraphy of the crannog was complex and badly obscured by the earlier diggings, so that<br />

its dating and structures have been the subject of much re-interpretation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> crannog survived as a large mound measuring 41m across, consisting of 3m thickness of<br />

peat, brushwood and timber, located at the eastern end of a now drained lake (Fig. 242).<br />

Lagore crannog was occupied between the seventh and early eleventh centuries A.D. and<br />

historical sources have traditionally been used to identify it as the actual historical site Loch<br />

Gabor, the early medieval residence of the kings of Brega of the southern Uí Néill.<br />

Archaeologists have in the past attempted to put the date of the start of Lagore back before<br />

the fifth century A.D., but most recent commentators have accepted the seventh-century<br />

origins for the site.<br />

Lagore crannog was certainly occupied over a long period, re-constructed and re-built on<br />

several occasions. <strong>The</strong>re is good evidence for some late Bronze Age activity on the site,<br />

although this is difficult to clarify. Hencken, strongly influenced by the constraints of the<br />

historical references, identified three separate, chronological, consecutive palisades of firstly<br />

piles, then posts and finally planks. Lynn has suggested there were even more phases of<br />

occupation. <strong>The</strong> palisades probably defined the outer defences of the crannog.<br />

Hencken suggested that the crannog builders firstly placed a layer of animal bone,<br />

brushwood and peat on the lakebed, to use as a foundation to work from in building the main<br />

crannog. This layer he designated as his Period 1a, which he considered, preceded the use of<br />

the crannog proper. Lynn has suggested that the Period 1a material is itself evidence of a<br />

lake settlement, rather than the debris and working platform of crannog builders. This<br />

occupation phase, compacted and driven into the lake muds by the weight of the later<br />

crannog, may have had houses, hearths, piles, wooden platforms, brushwood and wattle<br />

mats and occupation debris. This earliest phase of occupation produced some Roman pottery<br />

(including Terra Sigilata) and post-Roman material. <strong>The</strong> latter included seventh-century<br />

pottery, an iron sword, a seventh-century gold ornament and a seventh to eighth-century<br />

horse bit. Period Ib was taken by Hencken to represent the first main phase of occupation,<br />

but it probably was just one of several successive phases after the first occupation. Period 1b<br />

produced Romano-British pottery, evidence for a seventh to eighth century work-shop for<br />

making glass studs and a seventh-eighth century bronze disc.<br />

Liam Price’s historical research was to strongly influence Hencken’s interpretations of the<br />

chronology of the site. He believed that historical references to the destruction of the crannog<br />

could be identified in the archaeological record. He thought that the Period I occupation was<br />

abandoned after the event referred to in the Annals of Ulster for A.D. 850, when Cinaed son<br />

of Conaing, King of Cianancht rebelled against Mael Sechnaill, plundered the Uí Néill and<br />

‘deceitfully sacked the island of Loch Gabor, levelling it to the ground’ (corro ort innsi Locha<br />

Gabur dolose corbo comardd fria lar), while also burning the nearby church of Treóit. Period<br />

II and Period III produced few finds to enable close dating of the site. Hencken felt that the<br />

Period II occupation probably ended with the destruction by Lagore described by the Annals<br />

of Ulster for A.D. 934 when ‘the island of Loch Gabor was sacked by Amlaíb, grandson of<br />

494

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!