10.01.2014 Views

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Louth<br />

southern entrance was marked by three upright jambs. Charcoal and some small pottery<br />

fragments were discovered in the southern part of the structure.<br />

Hut C East was circular and had a diameter of 3.6m. <strong>The</strong> door was to the south and was<br />

flanked by two small jambs. A hearth was centrally placed and there were internal irregular<br />

traces of cobbling. Further indications of occupation included quantities of charcoal,<br />

fragments of a lignite bracelet, seven flint tools, an iron object and coarse pottery sherds. Hut<br />

C West was smaller and had a diameter of 2.3m. <strong>The</strong> entrance was similalrly to the south and<br />

a hearth was present centrally. Finds included charcoal, hazelnut shells, an iron knife, a flint<br />

(possibly a scraper) and small pottery sherds.<br />

Huts’ B and D were described by Davies as isolated huts within the cashel. Hut B South was<br />

roughly circular and had a diameter of 1.8m. A door, flanked by two jambs, was located to<br />

the south-east and it was paved with small stones. Charcoal and pottery sherds were the only<br />

finds. Hut D was very small and had a diameter of 1m. Charcoal was present in good<br />

quantities and a glass bead was recovered from the burnt earth. No entrance was evident.<br />

Hut E was constructed against the cashel’s inner wall. It was irregularly shaped and a small<br />

bench may have been situated in the west wall. A hearth was centrally placed and the floor<br />

was roughly paved. Finds from the hut included charcoal, two pieces of iron, flint tools (some<br />

probable strike-a-lights) and pottery sherds.<br />

Lissachiggel was probably constructed between the seventh and tenth centuries based on<br />

dating evidence for early medieval settlement enclosures (both earth and stone) and the<br />

presence of possible souterrain ware. Davies had identified two main periods of hut<br />

use/construction dating to the early and post medieval periods. It appears, based on the<br />

cashel’s upland location, above the productive agricultural soils, and the paucity of finds, that<br />

Lissachiggel was a low-status transhumance settlement which was utilised during the summer<br />

months.<br />

Fig. 208: Plan of interior of Lissachiggel, Co. Louth, showing houses (after Davies 1937-40,<br />

212).<br />

413

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!