Health Status and Functional Capacity of Indonesian Elderly at the ...
Health Status and Functional Capacity of Indonesian Elderly at the ... Health Status and Functional Capacity of Indonesian Elderly at the ...
Districts in JB are mostly older populations than those in OJB 140 120 100 < 6.00 6.00 - 7.99 8.00 - 11.99 12.00+ 80 60 40 20 0 Regencies in OJB Regencies in JB Cities in OJB Cities in JB Districts in OJB are generally young populations
percent 80.0 Good SRHS Region and Type of Districts differentiate the percentage of Good SRHS 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Regencies in OJB Regencies in JB Cities in OJB 0 - 29.99 30.00 - 49.99 50.00 - 69.99 Cities in OJB 70.0 60.0 50.0 Regencies in Java/Bali Cities in Java Regencies in Outer Cities in Outer 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 High inequality in good SRHS across districts 0.0 1 12 23 34 45 56 67 78 89 100 111 122 133 144 155 166 177 188 199 210 District
- Page 1 and 2: Organised by: Co-Sponsored: Malaysi
- Page 3 and 4: Active Ageing (WHO 2002) ◦ the pr
- Page 5 and 6: Aims ◦ to fill the gap on the kno
- Page 7 and 8: Method ◦ Descriptive analysis •
- Page 9: Covered region Outside Java/Bali 26
- Page 13 and 14: Many districts have higher percenta
- Page 15 and 16: Many districts with no difficulty i
- Page 17 and 18: Needing help in Meal Preparation 80
- Page 19 and 20: Good SRHS is statistically signific
- Page 21 and 22: Concluding Remarks ◦ Health inequ
percent<br />
80.0<br />
Good SRHS<br />
Region <strong>and</strong> Type <strong>of</strong> Districts<br />
differenti<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> Good SRHS<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Regencies<br />
in OJB<br />
Regencies<br />
in JB<br />
Cities in<br />
OJB<br />
0 - 29.99<br />
30.00 - 49.99<br />
50.00 - 69.99<br />
Cities in<br />
OJB<br />
70.0<br />
60.0<br />
50.0<br />
Regencies in Java/Bali<br />
Cities in Java<br />
Regencies in Outer<br />
Cities in Outer<br />
40.0<br />
30.0<br />
20.0<br />
10.0<br />
High inequality in good SRHS<br />
across districts<br />
0.0<br />
1 12 23 34 45 56 67 78 89 100 111 122 133 144 155 166 177 188 199 210<br />
District
Change language