Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network
Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network
Figure 4 IBRD/IDA and GEF Forestry-Related Lending, Including Forest Components in Nonforest Projects, 1997–2006 US$ million 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 286 61 1997 422 110 130 56 21 34 1998 1999 2000 165 84 67 20 2001 2002 249 54 105 19 128 45 IBRD/IDA GEF 148 2003 2004 2005 2006 32 Year (MENA) because of its low forest cover. In Morocco, a nation with relatively extensive forests, the World Bank is involved in preparing an Integrated Forest Development Project. In the Islamic Republic of Iran, a land and water management project has a community-based forest management component. In the East Asia and the Pacific region (EAP), the World Bank’s lending has focused on plantation development in countries, such as China, that are major consumers of forest raw materials. 6 Additional focus has been on policy dialogue for development of certification schemes. Also, successful projects in Vietnam and the Lao People’s Democratic Republic are working to address governance and policy reforms. In the South Asia region (SAR), India accounts for the bulk of lending. Lending commitments have been declining since 2003 as one generation of projects has ended (figure 5). Since then, lending awaits the results of an Analytical and Advisory Services (AAA) initiative designed to guide future lending and to reengage dialogue with the government about policy. 7 In the Latin America and the Caribbean region (LAC), projects have concentrated on community forestry, reforestation, forest land restoration, forest certification, forest concessions, policy, and legal reforms. 8 Additional projects Figure 5 Amount of IBRD/IDA Forestry Lending by Region, FY01–FY05 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2001 US$ millions 2002 2003 2004 2005 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 SSA EAP ECA LAC MENA SAR Region and years 8 INTRODUCTION: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN THE FOREST SECTOR
Figure 6 Regional Distribution of IBRD/IDA Lending, 2001–05 SAR 20% SSA 19% poverty, contribute to economic development, and preserve environmental values. Governments do not always make forestry a policy priority or seek Bank support, and in some instances analytical work that might have provided a framework for integrating forest issues into planning and policy making has been lacking or insufficient. The related analytical work has been highly variable and offers opportunity for improvement. MENA 9% LAC 15% in Belize, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Peru concern the creation and management of protected areas with an emphasis on indigenous and local community participation and forest management. See figure 6 for a regional breakdown of lending over 2001–05. PROGRESS TO DATE ECA 11% EAP 26% In 2006 the World Bank commissioned an independent midterm review of the Forests Strategy implementation (Contreras-Hermosilla and Simula 2007). The review found that the World Bank has made substantial progress on all fronts outlined in the strategy. Yet the strategy has been only partially implemented in the four years since its adoption. Some of its main achievements follow. Mainstreaming of the strategy. The World Bank has sought to manage the effects of macroeconomic policy and sector programs on forest resources. Some countries have incorporated forest sector reforms into their Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP). The Bank has supported these within the framework of CAS in countries like Cameroon, and through forest investment projects in such countries as Albania, Croatia, Romania, and Russia. The World Bank has also supported policy changes through DPLs, again for example, in Cameroon. In many other countries, however, forests have not been properly considered in the CAS or DPL, even in cases where doing so was clearly warranted by the size of the sector or its potential to alleviate Successful extension to nontropical forests has extended its engagement to nontropical forests, including those in China, Georgia, Romania, the Russian Federation, and Turkey. It has also supported timber production activities in tropical moist forests in countries such as Cambodia, Cameroon, and Mexico. The integration of forest components into natural-resource and rural development programs has intensified in countries like Albania, Gabon, and Guatemala. The World Bank has also broadened its focus on forestry with new instruments, such as independent certification. It has also expanded the scope of its interventions to account for the impacts on forests of policies in other sectors, such as trade. Despite these accomplishments, the World Bank’s overall level of engagement has thus far remained insufficient for achieving the targets set in the Forests Strategy. IBRD and IDA lending volumes increased only slowly, regaining and then stabilizing at levels comparable to volumes before the adoption of the strategy. Overall World Bank involvement in natural tropical forests operations remains modest and is often surrounded by intense controversy. In many cases the relative dearth of self-standing forest projects reflects the lack of priority that clients assign to investing in forests or to introducing forest sector reforms. Poverty reduction. Poverty reduction objectives, a pillar of the strategy as well as fundamental to the World Bank’s overall mission, have been appropriately included in forest investments in a number of countries, including Albania, Gabon, and Nicaragua. In many other countries, however, poverty and the effects of forest interventions on forestdependent people have not received adequate attention, either in the World Bank’s analytical work or in its lending program. Other key achievements include the following: ■ Strengthening forest sector governance and transparency. World Bank activities have created a political climate for high-level regional discussions on improvement in gov- INTRODUCTION: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN THE FOREST SECTOR 9
- Page 1 and 2: INTRODUCTION OPPORTUNITIES AND CHAL
- Page 3 and 4: Forest law enforcement and governan
- Page 5 and 6: ■ Protecting vital local and glob
- Page 7: Figure 3 Commitment from the World
- Page 11 and 12: management and biodiversity conserv
- Page 13: PART I Priority Themes and Operatio
- Page 16 and 17: Angelsen and Wunder 2003; and Malli
- Page 18 and 19: harvesting forest products that are
- Page 20 and 21: forest management and ownership hav
- Page 22 and 23: Institutional development of capaci
- Page 24 and 25: Contreras-Hermosilla, A., and M. Si
- Page 26 and 27: Box 1.4 Poverty-Forest Linkages Too
- Page 28 and 29: Box 1.6 An Overview of the Tools fo
- Page 30 and 31: NOTE 1.2 Community-Based Forest Man
- Page 32 and 33: the biophysical resource through fo
- Page 34 and 35: Box 1.12 Andhra Pradesh Community F
- Page 36 and 37: Box 1.14 Community Forestry in Mexi
- Page 38 and 39: World Bank, 1978. Forestry. Sector
- Page 40 and 41: [Indigenous Peoples’] rights of o
- Page 42 and 43: inappropriate. Thus, development pr
- Page 44 and 45: nity territory into individual plot
- Page 46 and 47: LESSONS LEARNED AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- Page 48 and 49: Borrini-Feyerabend, G., M. Pimbert,
- Page 50 and 51: In what are considered public fores
- Page 52 and 53: Figure 1.1 Toward Tenure Security:A
- Page 54 and 55: Box 1.21 Opportunities to Advance C
- Page 56 and 57: NOTE 1.5 Making Markets Work for th
Figure 6<br />
Regional Distribution of IBRD/IDA Lending,<br />
2001–05<br />
SAR<br />
20%<br />
SSA<br />
19%<br />
poverty, contribute to economic development, and preserve<br />
environmental values. Governments do not always make<br />
forestry a policy priority or seek Bank support, and in some<br />
instances analytical work that might have provided a<br />
framework for integrating forest issues into planning and<br />
policy making has been lacking or insufficient. The related<br />
analytical work has been highly variable and offers<br />
opportunity for improvement.<br />
MENA<br />
9%<br />
LAC<br />
15%<br />
in Belize, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador,<br />
Honduras, Nicaragua, and Peru concern the creation<br />
and management of protected areas with an emphasis on<br />
indigenous and local community participation and forest<br />
management.<br />
See figure 6 for a regional breakdown of lending over<br />
2001–05.<br />
PROGRESS TO DATE<br />
ECA<br />
11%<br />
EAP<br />
26%<br />
In 2006 the World Bank commissioned an independent<br />
midterm review of the <strong>Forests</strong> Strategy implementation<br />
(Contreras-Hermosilla and Simula 2007). The review found<br />
that the World Bank has made substantial progress on all<br />
fronts outlined in the strategy. Yet the strategy has been only<br />
partially implemented in the four years since its adoption.<br />
Some of its main achievements follow.<br />
Mainstreaming of the strategy. The World Bank has<br />
sought to manage the effects of macroeconomic policy and<br />
sector programs on forest resources. Some countries have<br />
incorporated forest sector reforms into their Poverty<br />
Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP). The Bank has supported<br />
these within the framework of CAS in countries like<br />
Cameroon, and through forest investment projects in such<br />
countries as Albania, Croatia, Romania, and Russia. The<br />
World Bank has also supported policy changes through DPLs,<br />
again for example, in Cameroon. In many other countries,<br />
however, forests have not been properly considered in the<br />
CAS or DPL, even in cases where doing so was clearly<br />
warranted by the size of the sector or its potential to alleviate<br />
Successful extension to nontropical forests has<br />
extended its engagement to nontropical forests, including<br />
those in China, Georgia, Romania, the Russian Federation,<br />
and Turkey. It has also supported timber production<br />
activities in tropical moist forests in countries such as<br />
Cambodia, Cameroon, and Mexico. The integration of<br />
forest components into natural-resource and rural<br />
development programs has intensified in countries like<br />
Albania, Gabon, and Guatemala. The World Bank has also<br />
broadened its focus on forestry with new instruments, such<br />
as independent certification. It has also expanded the scope<br />
of its interventions to account for the impacts on forests of<br />
policies in other sectors, such as trade.<br />
Despite these accomplishments, the World Bank’s overall<br />
level of engagement has thus far remained insufficient for<br />
achieving the targets set in the <strong>Forests</strong> Strategy. IBRD and<br />
IDA lending volumes increased only slowly, regaining and<br />
then stabilizing at levels comparable to volumes before the<br />
adoption of the strategy. Overall World Bank involvement<br />
in natural tropical forests operations remains modest and is<br />
often surrounded by intense controversy. In many cases the<br />
relative dearth of self-standing forest projects reflects the<br />
lack of priority that clients assign to investing in forests or<br />
to introducing forest sector reforms.<br />
Poverty reduction. Poverty reduction objectives, a pillar of<br />
the strategy as well as fundamental to the World Bank’s<br />
overall mission, have been appropriately included in forest<br />
investments in a number of countries, including Albania,<br />
Gabon, and Nicaragua. In many other countries, however,<br />
poverty and the effects of forest interventions on forestdependent<br />
people have not received adequate attention,<br />
either in the World Bank’s analytical work or in its lending<br />
program.<br />
Other key achievements include the following:<br />
■<br />
Strengthening forest sector governance and transparency.<br />
World Bank activities have created a political climate for<br />
high-level regional discussions on improvement in gov-<br />
INTRODUCTION: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN THE FOREST SECTOR 9