Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network
Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network
together communities and companies through partnership arrangements, build small and medium enterprises (SMEs), or enable socially responsible corporate investments. SMEs are a major potential source for off-farm employment in rural areas (Molnar et al. 2006). PAST ACTIVITIES The International Finance Corporation (IFC), the private sector arm of the World Bank Group, promotes sustainable private sector investment to foster economic development and reduce poverty. The IFC finances investments with its own resources and by mobilizing capital in the international financial markets. In addition to equity and loan financing, IFC also provides technical assistance to its clients, either funded by grants or by the clients themselves. Between fiscal 2 2003 and fiscal 2006, the IFC invested more than US$1 billion to help finance 25 forestry sector projects with a total cost of about US$4 billion (figure 2.1). The size of projects fluctuated between US$3 million (a packaging project in the Kyrgyz Republic) and US$500 million (a paper mill project in China). The pulp and paper industry accounted for 56 percent of the total, while 33 percent was directed at the wood-based panel and engineered-wood products industries, with some small investments made in sawmilling and furniture production. The share of forestry projects in private sector financing was 11 percent and on the increase. The IFC has not invested in projects requiring raw material from natural tropical moist forests. During this period, about half of IFC Box 2.1 IFC Projects in the Forest Products Sector The IFC has a Global Manufacturing and Services Department, within which there is a Forest Products Sector. The portfolio of projects from this sector spans a diverse group of pulp, paper, and converted products, ranging from linter and straw pulp to tissue, sacks, and various kinds of packaging. The sector involves dealing with sensitive political, social, and environmental issues. Among the greatest risks are severe environmental and human health impacts associated with antiquated technology and poor forest practices. Subsector categories in this sector include plantations, wood fiber, and woodworking. Source: http://www.ifc.org/ifcext/gms.nsf/Content/Forest _Products_Overview. Figure 2.1 US$ million 500 400 300 200 100 0 45 111 41 projects included an integrated forestry component. IFC technical assistance was mostly targeted at specific projects but some sector work was also carried out. 3 Geographically, Europe and Central Asia (ECA) attracted most IFC financing during the 2003–06 period followed by East Asia and the Pacific (EAP), Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), South Asia (SAR), and the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) (figure 2.2). Only one African country appears in the IFC portfolio during the period. 4 IFC projects concentrated in 16 countries, and the Bank had forestry lending activities in 10 of them, indicating a considerable geographic overlap. 5 The relatively high proportion of IFC investment channeled to the ECA region reflects the importance of the Russian Federation’s forest industries and the emerging forest industrial investment opportunities in Eastern European transition countries. In both EAP and LAC, the IFC’s main investments have been in rapidly expanding pulp and paper industries in China, India, and Brazil. Although the link to poverty alleviation may not be direct in most IFC investments, the project companies often generate significant employment, ranging from a few hun- Figure 2.2 IFC Forest Sector Investments 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Fiscal year 348 IFC Forest Investments Regional Distribution, 2003–06 MENA 4% LAC 21% SAR 13% EAP 25% 443 ECA 37% 205 64 CHAPTER 2: ENGAGING THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN FOREST SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
dred to tens of thousands of new jobs. Indirect employment impacts can be many times higher than direct employment, in particular when considering the forestry component. While almost all the investments to date relate to large industrial projects, the IFC has a particular interest in supporting the expansion and sustainable management of upstream fiber sources. Greater IFC involvement in forestry can enhance the positive impacts of industrial development in environmental conservation, economic development, and poverty alleviation while possible negative impacts can be better mitigated. 6 The International Development Association and International Bank for Reconstruction and Development arms of the World Bank Group have invested in enabling private sector engagement in the forest sector in different ways. In FY05, the Bank financed the Cameroon Forest and Environment development policy loan to help consolidate and scale up recent successful forest sector policy reforms, support capacity building, and strengthen forest and environment institutions. In this loan, a prior action for release of the second tranche included signed contracts with companies meeting requirements and implementation of appropriate measures, including the withdrawal of concession, if appropriate, for companies failing to meet requirements. Similarly, in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic poverty support reduction credit, there were prior actions that included completing requirements for independent certification of sustainable forest management and establishing a forest sector monitoring system. The World Bank has also been investing in activities enabling payments for environment services (see details in note 2.3, Innovative Marketing Arrangements for Environmental Services). In addition to lending, since 2004, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) Global Forest and Trade Network (GFTN) has been involved in World Bank–WWF Global Forest Alliance activities by building up enterprise-level capacity for certification and linking responsible suppliers with buyers (for example in Ghana, Indonesia, Nicaragua, Peru, Russia, and Vietnam). In Nicaragua, the cooperation of the GFTN resulted in IFC support for local companies to achieve certification. A financing mechanism for forest concessionaires was developed in Peru. Development of timber tracking systems has been supported in Cambodia, Nicaragua, Peru, and in the Congo Basin countries. To promote responsible investment in forest management, PRO- FOR (Program on Forests) and the World Bank–WWF Alliance for Forest Conservation and Sustainable Use have organized three investment forums (a global forum in 2004, and regional forums in East Africa in 2004 and in South Africa in 2006) that have focused on the development of the SME sector in forest-based activities within the framework of poverty reduction. KEY ISSUES Numerous private sector actors. A variety of private sector actors, all with different interests, capabilities, and constraints, influence the forest sector, including ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ large multinational companies, local companies of varying sizes, individual private investors (for example, conservation investments by philanthropists), community or cooperative enterprises applying SFM, and small-scale forest owners. Primary manufacturers might include chainsaw operators or small sawmills, in addition to large corporations whose annual sales might be larger than the gross domestic product (GDP) of many developing countries. All have the potential to invest productively, create jobs, and expand— thereby contributing to economic growth and poverty reduction. Each type of business (or investment opportunity) can be affected differently by changes in international and domestic markets, as well as by changes in governmental policies and the general in-country business and investment environments (ITTO 2006). Factors influencing private sector investment. Factors that influence private sector decisions about forest-related investments include the following: ■ ■ ■ Returns. Sufficient returns are a prerequisite; therefore, any factors that reduce the returns or profits from the investment can act as a deterrent. Risks. Weighing returns against risks, private investors generally demand much higher returns (typically 15 percent to 30 percent) from developing countries where risks are (or can be perceived as being) high. Transaction costs. High transaction costs can make investments less attractive. For example, evidence indicates that small investors in particular find it difficult to meet the additional costs associated with SFM (see note 3.2, Forest Certification Systems). Elements of an enabling environment. To encourage the private sector to invest in SFM with full confidence and CHAPTER 2: ENGAGING THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN FOREST SECTOR DEVELOPMENT 65
- Page 13: PART I Priority Themes and Operatio
- Page 16 and 17: Angelsen and Wunder 2003; and Malli
- Page 18 and 19: harvesting forest products that are
- Page 20 and 21: forest management and ownership hav
- Page 22 and 23: Institutional development of capaci
- Page 24 and 25: Contreras-Hermosilla, A., and M. Si
- Page 26 and 27: Box 1.4 Poverty-Forest Linkages Too
- Page 28 and 29: Box 1.6 An Overview of the Tools fo
- Page 30 and 31: NOTE 1.2 Community-Based Forest Man
- Page 32 and 33: the biophysical resource through fo
- Page 34 and 35: Box 1.12 Andhra Pradesh Community F
- Page 36 and 37: Box 1.14 Community Forestry in Mexi
- Page 38 and 39: World Bank, 1978. Forestry. Sector
- Page 40 and 41: [Indigenous Peoples’] rights of o
- Page 42 and 43: inappropriate. Thus, development pr
- Page 44 and 45: nity territory into individual plot
- Page 46 and 47: LESSONS LEARNED AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- Page 48 and 49: Borrini-Feyerabend, G., M. Pimbert,
- Page 50 and 51: In what are considered public fores
- Page 52 and 53: Figure 1.1 Toward Tenure Security:A
- Page 54 and 55: Box 1.21 Opportunities to Advance C
- Page 56 and 57: NOTE 1.5 Making Markets Work for th
- Page 58 and 59: ■ environmental groups to produce
- Page 60 and 61: Box 1.25 Medicinal Plants as NTFPs
- Page 63: CHAPTER 2 Engaging the Private Sect
- Page 67 and 68: Box 2.2 Since 1995, Brazilian small
- Page 69 and 70: Macqueen, D., N. Armitage, M. Jaeck
- Page 71 and 72: NOTE 2.1 COMPANY-COMMUNITY PARTNERS
- Page 73 and 74: inputs (communities), and cost savi
- Page 75 and 76: community arrangements, such as eth
- Page 77 and 78: NOTE 2.2 Small and Medium Enterpris
- Page 79 and 80: must be distinguished from products
- Page 81 and 82: overregulation falls most heavily o
- Page 83 and 84: da Amazônia (IPAM) and the Interna
- Page 85 and 86: NOTE 2.3 Innovative Marketing Arran
- Page 87 and 88: Table 2.2 World Bank Projects with
- Page 89 and 90: payments for reforestation can enco
- Page 91: Wunder, S. 2005. “Payments for En
- Page 94 and 95: Box 3.1 Technical Definitions Wood
- Page 96 and 97: Table 3.2 Wood Fuel Data for Select
- Page 98 and 99: ered it important to have the World
- Page 100 and 101: operations (such as community-based
- Page 102 and 103: also needs to be extended in many c
- Page 104 and 105: NOTE 3.1 Mainstreaming Conservation
- Page 106 and 107: areas that can be used more intensi
- Page 108 and 109: Box 3.7 Applying HCVF in Papua New
- Page 110 and 111: Finally, any existing protections,
- Page 112 and 113: However, these general rules are se
dred to tens of thousands of new jobs. Indirect employment<br />
impacts can be many times higher than direct employment,<br />
in particular when considering the forestry component.<br />
While almost all the investments to date relate to large<br />
industrial projects, the IFC has a particular interest in supporting<br />
the expansion and sustainable management of<br />
upstream fiber sources. Greater IFC involvement in forestry<br />
can enhance the positive impacts of industrial development<br />
in environmental conservation, economic development,<br />
and poverty alleviation while possible negative impacts can<br />
be better mitigated. 6<br />
The International Development Association and International<br />
Bank for Reconstruction and Development arms of<br />
the World Bank Group have invested in enabling private<br />
sector engagement in the forest sector in different ways. In<br />
FY05, the Bank financed the Cameroon Forest and Environment<br />
development policy loan to help consolidate and scale<br />
up recent successful forest sector policy reforms, support<br />
capacity building, and strengthen forest and environment<br />
institutions. In this loan, a prior action for release of the second<br />
tranche included signed contracts with companies<br />
meeting requirements and implementation of appropriate<br />
measures, including the withdrawal of concession, if appropriate,<br />
for companies failing to meet requirements. Similarly,<br />
in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic poverty support<br />
reduction credit, there were prior actions that included<br />
completing requirements for independent certification of<br />
sustainable forest management and establishing a forest sector<br />
monitoring system. The World Bank has also been<br />
investing in activities enabling payments for environment<br />
services (see details in note 2.3, Innovative Marketing<br />
Arrangements for Environmental Services).<br />
In addition to lending, since 2004, the World Wildlife<br />
Fund (WWF) Global Forest and Trade <strong>Network</strong> (GFTN)<br />
has been involved in World Bank–WWF Global Forest<br />
Alliance activities by building up enterprise-level capacity<br />
for certification and linking responsible suppliers with buyers<br />
(for example in Ghana, Indonesia, Nicaragua, Peru, Russia,<br />
and Vietnam). In Nicaragua, the cooperation of the<br />
GFTN resulted in IFC support for local companies to<br />
achieve certification. A financing mechanism for forest concessionaires<br />
was developed in Peru. Development of timber<br />
tracking systems has been supported in Cambodia,<br />
Nicaragua, Peru, and in the Congo Basin countries. To promote<br />
responsible investment in forest management, PRO-<br />
FOR (Program on <strong>Forests</strong>) and the World Bank–WWF<br />
Alliance for Forest Conservation and Sustainable Use have<br />
organized three investment forums (a global forum in 2004,<br />
and regional forums in East Africa in 2004 and in South<br />
Africa in 2006) that have focused on the development of the<br />
SME sector in forest-based activities within the framework<br />
of poverty reduction.<br />
KEY ISSUES<br />
Numerous private sector actors. A variety of private<br />
sector actors, all with different interests, capabilities, and<br />
constraints, influence the forest sector, including<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
large multinational companies,<br />
local companies of varying sizes,<br />
individual private investors (for example, conservation<br />
investments by philanthropists),<br />
community or cooperative enterprises applying SFM,<br />
and<br />
small-scale forest owners.<br />
Primary manufacturers might include chainsaw operators<br />
or small sawmills, in addition to large corporations<br />
whose annual sales might be larger than the gross domestic<br />
product (GDP) of many developing countries. All have the<br />
potential to invest productively, create jobs, and expand—<br />
thereby contributing to economic growth and poverty<br />
reduction. Each type of business (or investment opportunity)<br />
can be affected differently by changes in international<br />
and domestic markets, as well as by changes in governmental<br />
policies and the general in-country business and investment<br />
environments (ITTO 2006).<br />
Factors influencing private sector investment. Factors<br />
that influence private sector decisions about forest-related<br />
investments include the following:<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
Returns. Sufficient returns are a prerequisite; therefore,<br />
any factors that reduce the returns or profits from the<br />
investment can act as a deterrent.<br />
Risks. Weighing returns against risks, private investors<br />
generally demand much higher returns (typically 15 percent<br />
to 30 percent) from developing countries where<br />
risks are (or can be perceived as being) high.<br />
Transaction costs. High transaction costs can make<br />
investments less attractive. For example, evidence indicates<br />
that small investors in particular find it difficult to<br />
meet the additional costs associated with SFM (see note<br />
3.2, Forest Certification Systems).<br />
Elements of an enabling environment. To encourage<br />
the private sector to invest in SFM with full confidence and<br />
CHAPTER 2: ENGAGING THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN FOREST SECTOR DEVELOPMENT 65