08.01.2014 Views

Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network

Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network

Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 12.1<br />

General Consultation Process<br />

When With whom Substance By whom<br />

Identification Borrower Possibility of Indigenous Peoples in the project area; World Bank policy requirements Project team<br />

Experts on Indigenous Identification and presence of Indigenous Peoples in the project area Project team/<br />

Peoples<br />

Borrower<br />

Borrower If Indigenous Peoples are present, identify the process for addressing Project team<br />

Indigenous Peoples’ issues and OP 4.10 requirements, including terms of<br />

reference for the social assessment and consultations<br />

Preparation Indigenous Peoples, Information about the proposed project (preliminary design), its anticipated SA team/<br />

first phase benefits, and possible adverse impacts Borrower<br />

Other stakeholders Information about the project, its anticipated benefits, and possible SA team/<br />

adverse impacts<br />

Borrower<br />

Indigenous Peoples, On the proposed project (detailed design) and possible measures to address SA team/<br />

second phase particular issues concerning Indigenous Peoples Borrower<br />

Obtaining broad community support and input to the Indigenous Peoples<br />

instrument<br />

Other stakeholders Consultations on the proposed project (detailed design) SA team/<br />

Borrower<br />

Appraisal Borrower Assessment of commitment and capacity of implementing agency Project team<br />

concerning Indigenous Peoples’ activities<br />

Indigenous Peoples, Assessment of feasibility and appropriateness of Indigenous Peoples’ measures Project team/<br />

experts, and other<br />

Borrower<br />

stakeholders<br />

Indigenous Peoples Select field visits as needed to determine affected communities’ broad Project team<br />

support to the project and the feasibility of proposed measures<br />

Implementation Borrower On the implementation and monitoring of Indigenous Peoples’ instrument Project team<br />

Indigenous Peoples Ongoing consultation on implementation progress through borrower Borrower/<br />

monitoring and World Bank supervision<br />

Project team<br />

Experts and other Consultation and feedback on implementation progress as appropriate Borrower/<br />

stakeholders<br />

Project team<br />

Source: Jensby 2007.<br />

Note: SA = Social Assessment.<br />

them with culturally appropriate project benefits; (d) recommendations<br />

for free, prior, and informed consultation<br />

with and participation by Indigenous Peoples’ communities<br />

during project implementation, monitoring, and evaluation;<br />

and (e) any formal agreements reached with Indigenous<br />

Peoples’ communities and/or the IPOs [Indigenous<br />

Peoples’ Organizations]” (OP 4.10, paragraph 11).<br />

It is the responsibility of the World Bank to review the<br />

process and the outcome of the consultations to satisfy itself<br />

that the affected Indigenous Peoples’ communities have provided<br />

their broad support to the project. The World Bank<br />

does not proceed with the project processing if it is unable to<br />

ascertain that such support exists (OP 4.10, paragraph 11). A<br />

mix of opinions, and sometimes disagreements, as to the<br />

overall desirability of the project should be anticipated.<br />

When considering the level of broad support for the project<br />

and the strength of the consultation process itself, the project<br />

team should ensure that all relevant and appropriate sectors<br />

and subgroups of the communities have been given<br />

opportunities to express themselves. If they have, and the<br />

broad majority is generally positive about the prospects of<br />

the project, the finding that broad support exists would be<br />

reasonable. While a referendum may not be practical in most<br />

situations, there is a need for broadly based validation and<br />

documentation of what has been said, by whom, and how<br />

any specific agreements were reached and what they contain.<br />

Broad community support does not mean that everyone<br />

has to agree on a given project. Nevertheless, consensus<br />

building is an important form of decision making among<br />

many Indigenous Peoples. Thus, consensus building should<br />

often be an element of the free, prior, and informed consultations<br />

that aim to facilitate broad community support for<br />

the project. A community’s broad support may be based on<br />

specific agreements for benefit-sharing measures or mitigation<br />

of adverse impacts. As part of its due diligence in applying<br />

OP 4.10, the project team must ensure that such agreements<br />

are adequately reflected in project design and the<br />

Indigenous Peoples’ instrument.<br />

Indigenous Peoples’ instrument. For projects affecting<br />

Indigenous Peoples, the borrower prepares an instrument<br />

containing specific measures to ensure that Indigenous Peo-<br />

352 CHAPTER 12: APPLYING OP 4.10 ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!