08.01.2014 Views

Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network

Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network

Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 10.3 Involving the Public in Decision Making<br />

Key Points Advantages Disadvantages<br />

Advisory groups • Task forces: Set up task groups to focus on • Can address highly technical problems • Rarely represents all interested parties<br />

a single technical issue Define the limit of • Help prioritize and reach consensus • May replace wider consultations<br />

the group’s authority and lifetime; ensure • Often focuses too much on procedures<br />

that all interests are represented and that<br />

contact with the public is maintained.<br />

Problem-solving<br />

• Brainstorming: Designed to enhance • Help groups break out of the obvious • Difficult to include a full range of views<br />

techniques creativity and generate ideas quickly • Provide insights for decision making • May yield too many ideas to evaluate<br />

• Selection of the facilitator and<br />

participants is critical.<br />

Consensus-building • Unassisted negotiations, mediation: • Provide a forum for jointly identifying solutions • Not all parties will participate<br />

techniques Voluntary processes by which represen- • Puts responsibility on the disputants to • Parties may drop out before the end<br />

tatives of affected organizations make identify common ground • Requires good faith<br />

decisions by consensus, to be ratified • Can reach robust agreements with broad support • May take too long<br />

by parent organizations. • Can lead to quick resolution of contentious issues • Highly skilled mediators are scarce<br />

• Parties either agree on decision-making<br />

procedures at the outset or use an<br />

experienced mediator.<br />

Arbitration • A process by which conflicting parties • Provides impartiality from an uninvolved party • All parties must stand to gain<br />

seek a solution through an impartial • Is difficult to oppose the arbitrator’s • Difficult to identify an acceptable neutral party<br />

mediator. recommendations<br />

• It can be binding, by prior agreement,<br />

or all sides may reserve judgment until<br />

the outcome.<br />

Source: World Bank 1999: 13.<br />

Note: This table, extensively abridged, was adapted from the World Bank’s The Public Participation Handbook (1996), which contains a full version of the table and extensive supporting text<br />

describing each tool.<br />

328

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!