Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network
Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network
Table 10.1 Consultation at Various Stages of an Environmental Assessment Project Stage in EA process Consultation goals Strategic consideration Validation of environmental procedures and Review national law and practice Is there a need? Are there opportunities for standards relating to consultation capacity building? Ensure compatibility with World Bank requirements Screening:Assign an EA category Identify stakeholder groups; secure Is there a commitment to consultation from proponent commitment to project proponents and the relevant consultation program authority? Agree on extent and mode of consultation Scoping: Agree on EA TOR and schedule Identify stakeholders What resources are needed and available? Who is responsible for implementation and monitoring and evaluation? Disclose relevant project information Are there potential conflicts between the needs of the developer and those of the public? Determine stakeholder concerns and include them in the TOR Environmental analysis and production of Disclose information on study methods What methods are appropriate for reaching draft EA reports (including social and findings different stakeholder groups? assessment and resettlement plan, Agree on proposed mitigation measures as appropriate) with stakeholders Let stakeholders determine whether their concerns are adequately addressed Production of final report Finalize mitigation plan and disclose to Are mechanisms in place to ensure ongoing stakeholders consultation and compliance with agreements? Implement the Environmental Management Inform the public about scheduling of What role can stakeholders play in monitoring? Plan (including environmental monitoring) potentially disruptive events Disclose results of environmental monitoring Maintain effective complaints procedures Final evaluation Assess effective consultation process Were any lessons learned that might be transferable to other projects? Consult stakeholders for their assessment Source: World Bank 1999: 2. Note: This table, extensively abridged, was adapted from the World Bank’s The Public Participation Handbook (1996), which contains a full version of the table and extensive supporting text describing each tool. ■ ■ ■ Identify goals. This component should detail issues to be addressed and desired outcomes, as well as the feasibility of those goals. Goals will vary with the scope, size, and phase of projects. Assess target audience. What motivates them? What are their needs? What are their stakes in the project? This component has obvious overlap with consultation and the results of stakeholder analysis (see consultation section above). Develop key messages. – The content will be based on previously identified issues and desired outcomes. – The scope and timing for the plan will depend on the scale and phase of the project (for worksheets helpful for developing timelines for communication projects, see Module 9 of the World Bank’s Strategic Communication for Development Projects [Cabañero-Verzosa 2003]). ■ ■ ■ Define roles and accountability. Clearly establish divisions of responsibility for which tasks will be handled by which agency (see annex 10A to this chapter for a checklist). This may entail an assessment of client capacity for communications tasks and opportunities for capacity building. Specific areas of assessment might include communications planning and management, research, communications material development and production, monitoring and evaluation, liaison work with mass media, and liaison work with large-scale outreach networks. (See Cabañero-Verzosa 2003 for guide questions to assess institutional capacity [module 7] and for a model TOR [module 4].) Identify allies, barriers, options, and possible risks. This identification could potentially be accomplished with communications planning workshops with stakeholders, using participatory methods. Outline initiatives and tactics for communications plan. 326 CHAPTER 10: CONSULTATION AND COMMUNICATION IN FOREST SECTOR ACTIVITIES
Table 10.2 Listening to the Public Key Points Advantages Disadvantages Survey techniques • Interviews, formed surveys, polls, and • Show how groups want to be involved • Poor interviewing is counterproductive questionnaires can rapidly show who • Allow direct communication with the • High cost is interested and why. public • Requires specialists to deliver and analyze • May be structured (using a fixed • Help access the views of the majority • Tradeoff between openness and statistical validity questionnaire) or nonstructured. • Are less vulnerable to the influence of • Experienced interviewers or surveyors vocal groups familiar with the project should be used. • Identify concerns linked to social grouping • Pre-test the questions. • Give statistically representative results • Open-ended questions are best. • Can reach people who are not organized in groups Small meetings • Public seminars or focus groups create • Allow detailed and focused discussion • Complex to organize and run formal information exchanges between • Can exchange information and debate • Can be diverted by special interest groups the sponsor and the public; may consist • Provide a rapid, low-cost monitor of public mood • Not objective or statistically valid of randomly selected individuals or target • Provide a way to reach marginal groups • May be unduly influenced by moderators group members; experts may be invited to serve as a resource. Large meetings • Public meetings allow the public to • Are useful for medium audiences • Not suitable for detailed discussions respond directly to formal presentations • Allow immediate response and feedback • Not good for building consensus by project sponsors. • Acquaint different interest groups • Can be diverted by special interest groups • Effective meetings need a strong chairman, • Attendance is difficult to predict a clear agenda, and good presenters or resource people. Conferences • Technical experts and representatives of • Impart specialized technical information • Time and effort needed to prepare interest groups may be brought together. • Promote data sharing and compromise • Cost, if experts are hired • Resolve technical issues Community organizers • These work closely with a selected group • Mobilize difficult-to-reach groups • Potential conflicts between employers and clients or advocates to facilitate informal contacts, visit homes • Time needed to get feedback or work places, or simply be available to the public. Source: World Bank 1999: 6. Note: This table, extensively abridged, was adapted from the World Bank’s The Public Participation Handbook (1996), which contains a full versios of the table and extensive supporting text describing each tool. 327
- Page 276 and 277: ■ ■ ■ ■ Availability of ref
- Page 278 and 279: Box 7.19 Selecting the Appropriate
- Page 280 and 281: Table 7.4 Existing Satellite Remote
- Page 282 and 283: Tropical Ecosystem Environment Obse
- Page 285: PART II Guidance on Implementing Fo
- Page 288 and 289: forestry activities was counterprod
- Page 290 and 291: waterways, or the quantity or quali
- Page 292 and 293: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ an independent
- Page 294 and 295: ■ In the case of forest harvestin
- Page 296 and 297: ■ ■ harvesting supported by Wor
- Page 298 and 299: However, some of the World Bank’s
- Page 300 and 301: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Examine the
- Page 302 and 303: Box 9.2 Participation Strategy To m
- Page 304 and 305: Box 9.5 Process Framework for Invol
- Page 306 and 307: Box 9.8 Market Analysis A market an
- Page 308 and 309: “no-project” option); and recom
- Page 310 and 311: Box 9.16 Environmental Management P
- Page 312 and 313: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
- Page 314 and 315: the detailed Biodiversidade Brasile
- Page 316 and 317: ■ ■ management plan—prepared
- Page 319 and 320: CHAPTER 10 Consultation and Communi
- Page 321 and 322: media, NGOs, other interest groups,
- Page 323 and 324: Box 10.4 Consultation in the Democr
- Page 325: Box 10.6 Elements of Communication
- Page 329 and 330: ■ - Preliminary research should i
- Page 331 and 332: Box 10.8 Managing Risks through Str
- Page 333 and 334: Bank project cycle related to Commu
- Page 335 and 336: CHAPTER 11 Forest Certification Ass
- Page 337 and 338: carried out under a specific certif
- Page 339 and 340: once more practical experience has
- Page 341 and 342: ANNEX 11A MODEL TERMS OF REFERENCE
- Page 343 and 344: ANNEX 11B PROCEDURES AND TERMS OF R
- Page 347 and 348: CHAPTER 12 Applying OP 4.10 on Indi
- Page 349 and 350: lack of opportunities relative to o
- Page 351 and 352: Box 12.2 When a project affects Ind
- Page 353 and 354: ples receive social and economic be
- Page 355 and 356: Bank’s supervision team must incl
- Page 357: ANNEX 12A ELEMENTS OF AN INDIGENOUS
- Page 360 and 361: forest monitoring, 275b social and
- Page 362 and 363: FOMAS. See National Forest Sector M
- Page 364 and 365: and forest certification, 335 toolk
- Page 366 and 367: applying to Indigenous Peoples, 347
- Page 368 and 369: strategic partnership, LFI example,
- Page 372: Eco-Audit Environmental Benefits St
Table 10.1<br />
Consultation at Various Stages of an Environmental Assessment Project<br />
Stage in EA process Consultation goals Strategic consideration<br />
Validation of environmental procedures and Review national law and practice Is there a need? Are there opportunities for<br />
standards relating to consultation capacity building?<br />
Ensure compatibility with World<br />
Bank requirements<br />
Screening:Assign an EA category Identify stakeholder groups; secure Is there a commitment to consultation from<br />
proponent commitment to<br />
project proponents and the relevant<br />
consultation program<br />
authority?<br />
Agree on extent and mode of consultation<br />
Scoping: Agree on EA TOR and schedule Identify stakeholders What resources are needed and available? Who<br />
is responsible for implementation and<br />
monitoring and evaluation?<br />
Disclose relevant project information Are there potential conflicts between the needs<br />
of the developer and those of the public?<br />
Determine stakeholder concerns and<br />
include them in the TOR<br />
Environmental analysis and production of Disclose information on study methods What methods are appropriate for reaching<br />
draft EA reports (including social and findings different stakeholder groups?<br />
assessment and resettlement plan, Agree on proposed mitigation measures<br />
as appropriate)<br />
with stakeholders<br />
Let stakeholders determine whether their<br />
concerns are adequately addressed<br />
Production of final report Finalize mitigation plan and disclose to Are mechanisms in place to ensure ongoing<br />
stakeholders<br />
consultation and compliance with agreements?<br />
Implement the Environmental Management Inform the public about scheduling of What role can stakeholders play in monitoring?<br />
Plan (including environmental monitoring) potentially disruptive events<br />
Disclose results of environmental<br />
monitoring<br />
Maintain effective complaints procedures<br />
Final evaluation Assess effective consultation process Were any lessons learned that might be<br />
transferable to other projects?<br />
Consult stakeholders for their assessment<br />
Source: World Bank 1999: 2.<br />
Note: This table, extensively abridged, was adapted from the World Bank’s The Public Participation Handbook (1996), which contains a full version<br />
of the table and extensive supporting text describing each tool.<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
Identify goals. This component should detail issues to be<br />
addressed and desired outcomes, as well as the feasibility<br />
of those goals. Goals will vary with the scope, size, and<br />
phase of projects.<br />
Assess target audience. What motivates them? What are<br />
their needs? What are their stakes in the project? This<br />
component has obvious overlap with consultation and<br />
the results of stakeholder analysis (see consultation section<br />
above).<br />
Develop key messages.<br />
– The content will be based on previously identified<br />
issues and desired outcomes.<br />
– The scope and timing for the plan will depend on the<br />
scale and phase of the project (for worksheets helpful<br />
for developing timelines for communication projects,<br />
see Module 9 of the World Bank’s Strategic Communication<br />
for Development Projects [Cabañero-Verzosa<br />
2003]).<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
Define roles and accountability. Clearly establish divisions<br />
of responsibility for which tasks will be handled by which<br />
agency (see annex 10A to this chapter for a checklist).<br />
This may entail an assessment of client capacity for communications<br />
tasks and opportunities for capacity building.<br />
Specific areas of assessment might include communications<br />
planning and management, research,<br />
communications material development and production,<br />
monitoring and evaluation, liaison work with mass<br />
media, and liaison work with large-scale outreach networks.<br />
(See Cabañero-Verzosa 2003 for guide questions<br />
to assess institutional capacity [module 7] and for a<br />
model TOR [module 4].)<br />
Identify allies, barriers, options, and possible risks. This<br />
identification could potentially be accomplished with<br />
communications planning workshops with stakeholders,<br />
using participatory methods.<br />
Outline initiatives and tactics for communications plan.<br />
326 CHAPTER 10: CONSULTATION AND COMMUNICATION IN FOREST SECTOR ACTIVITIES