Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network
Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network
Box 9.5 Process Framework for Involuntary Access Restrictions (continued) ■ ■ ■ Policy – agreement on basic principles, entitlement framework, criteria, and so forth – formal endorsement by the government Analysis and documentation – census, surveys as required – analysis of social groups, with special emphasis on risk and vulnerability Meaningful consultation and disclosure – documentation of consultation processes and implications for project design and implementation mechanisms ■ ■ – public disclosure of relevant information in local languages Action and mitigation plans – budget provision and clear responsibilities – supervision, monitoring, and evaluation mechanisms established Institutional capacity and commitment – evidence plans are realistic, can be implemented – responsible institutions and agencies identified Sources: World Bank 2005b. Qualifications of consultants for social assessment. The consultant or team of consultants should have the following qualifications: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ practical experience in designing and implementing participatory natural resource management projects, in assessing and addressing interests of vulnerable people, and an ability to manage interdisciplinary teams detailed local knowledge of social issues related to natural resource management, including usage of forest and agriculture resources and community practices involving natural resources familiarity with the legal framework for usufruct rights and access experience with local forest or forest-related social issues operational experience in social survey methods ability to engage with local people and keep an open mind to new approaches ability to speak local languages Additional qualifications might include the following: extensive experience in microenterprise development; familiarity with microfinance and revolving fund options, marketing issues, and regulatory climate experience with assessing structure, capacity, and interlinkages of national and community-level organizations knowledge of national and local institutions extensive experience in community development and participatory planning ■ ■ operational experience in analysis and design of communication activities and dissemination materials extensive professional background in human resources development, including experience with training needs assessment, building analytical and problem-solving skills, and participative and interactive approaches to training Economic and financial analysis This analysis should examine the various economic and financial factors affecting a forest-related project to enhance the economic efficiency of the project and address distributional questions. An economic analysis compares economic and social benefits to the economy as a whole. The financial analysis compares revenue and expenses, like operations and maintenance costs. It is important to understand the economic value of forests that are affected by the project. In addition to forest products and services, this valuation should include nonmarket uses of forests, such as environmental services, social uses, and subsistence uses. In particular, the consultant should focus on the following key components for this analysis: Economic importance ■ evaluate direct use of forests arising from consumptive and nonconsumptive uses: timber, fruits, nuts, mushrooms, medicinal plants, forage, hunting and fishing, tourism and recreation, genetic resources, and educational uses 304 CHAPTER 9:APPLYING FORESTS POLICY OP 4.36
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ evaluate indirect use of forests: watershed and soil protection, wind breaks, climate control, and nutrient cycling evaluate options values, including future direct and indirect uses evaluate off-site and on-site economic effects; also evaluate private costs and benefits versus social costs and benefits, with attention to market failures, policy-induced distortions, and externalities evaluate nontimber values like health, carbon sequestration, and alternative livelihood strategies assess the incremental or additional costs associated with transforming a project with national benefits into one with global environmental benefits, for Global Environment Facility projects Financial analysis ■ evaluate the financial viability of investments like reforestation, microenterprises, and so forth; also evaluate risk and market access ■ conduct a financial analysis from the perspectives of various stakeholders ■ undertake a cost-benefit analysis (see box 9.6) ■ base decisions, to the extent possible, on a total economic valuation of forest resources, that is, an estimate of the value of all economic benefits that a society derives from its forests (see box 9.7) Potential methodology ■ review of primary and secondary data sources ■ rapid Rural Appraisal ■ interviews, including stakeholder interviews, questionnaires, village-based surveys for livelihood analysis (including wealth ranking, group interviews, process analysis) ■ Cost-benefit analysis ■ Market analysis (see box 9.8) ■ Contingent valuation ■ Quantitative measures, including TEV, internal rate of return, net present value Box 9.6 Cost-Benefit Analysis Box 9.7 Total Economic Valuation A detailed cost-benefit analysis will be undertaken during project preparation, taking into account the issues of economic importance and financial analysis and using quantitative models. Incremental costs and benefits of project investments will be examined in detail, and economic and financial rates of return calculated. Cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted on alternative plantation and protection techniques. The analysis will also include the preparation of indicative economic and financial models for participatory management of forests by locals, including analysis of alternative land uses. The economists will also undertake sensitivity analysis on key risks and discuss implications for project design. The quantified cost-benefit analysis will be supplemented by an analysis of other environmental benefits not as readily conducive to financial quantification (for example, biodiversity, climatic changes), which, where appropriate, will take into account physical measurements and least-cost analysis of any associated marginal costs of interventions specific to those benefits. Source: World Bank 2003a. Total economic valuation (TEV) is a method used to identify and estimate the value of all economic benefits that a society derives from its forests. As such, TEV extends well beyond the scope of financial analyses of forest values that concentrate almost exclusively on timber, to account for the great variety of other products and services provided by a forest system. The TEV of a forest is the sum its use and nonuse values. Use values are, in turn, divided into direct, indirect, and option values; while nonuse values include bequest and existence values. Examples of the various use values include ■ ■ ■ Direct uses—timber, fruits, nuts, mushrooms, medicinal plants, forage, hunting and fishing, tourism and recreation, genetic resources, and educational uses Indirect uses—watershed and soil protection, wind breaks, climate control, and nutrient cycling Option—future direct and indirect uses Source: World Bank 2003a. CHAPTER 9:APPLYING FORESTS POLICY OP 4.36 305
- Page 254 and 255: Assessment (www.millenniumassessmen
- Page 256 and 257: FAO. 2004. “Manual for Environmen
- Page 258 and 259: ■ ■ ■ enables implementation
- Page 260 and 261: selecting the technology. Technolog
- Page 262 and 263: USFS Field Guides: www.fia.fs.fed.u
- Page 264 and 265: Box 7.13 System Architecture of a S
- Page 266 and 267: Box 7.14 FMIS in Bosnia and Herzego
- Page 268 and 269: and client-rich system, which would
- Page 270 and 271: ANNEX 7.2A MODEL TERMS OF REFERENCE
- Page 272 and 273: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
- Page 274 and 275: NOTE 7.3 Spatial Monitoring of Fore
- Page 276 and 277: ■ ■ ■ ■ Availability of ref
- Page 278 and 279: Box 7.19 Selecting the Appropriate
- Page 280 and 281: Table 7.4 Existing Satellite Remote
- Page 282 and 283: Tropical Ecosystem Environment Obse
- Page 285: PART II Guidance on Implementing Fo
- Page 288 and 289: forestry activities was counterprod
- Page 290 and 291: waterways, or the quantity or quali
- Page 292 and 293: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ an independent
- Page 294 and 295: ■ In the case of forest harvestin
- Page 296 and 297: ■ ■ harvesting supported by Wor
- Page 298 and 299: However, some of the World Bank’s
- Page 300 and 301: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Examine the
- Page 302 and 303: Box 9.2 Participation Strategy To m
- Page 306 and 307: Box 9.8 Market Analysis A market an
- Page 308 and 309: “no-project” option); and recom
- Page 310 and 311: Box 9.16 Environmental Management P
- Page 312 and 313: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
- Page 314 and 315: the detailed Biodiversidade Brasile
- Page 316 and 317: ■ ■ management plan—prepared
- Page 319 and 320: CHAPTER 10 Consultation and Communi
- Page 321 and 322: media, NGOs, other interest groups,
- Page 323 and 324: Box 10.4 Consultation in the Democr
- Page 325 and 326: Box 10.6 Elements of Communication
- Page 327 and 328: Table 10.2 Listening to the Public
- Page 329 and 330: ■ - Preliminary research should i
- Page 331 and 332: Box 10.8 Managing Risks through Str
- Page 333 and 334: Bank project cycle related to Commu
- Page 335 and 336: CHAPTER 11 Forest Certification Ass
- Page 337 and 338: carried out under a specific certif
- Page 339 and 340: once more practical experience has
- Page 341 and 342: ANNEX 11A MODEL TERMS OF REFERENCE
- Page 343 and 344: ANNEX 11B PROCEDURES AND TERMS OF R
- Page 347 and 348: CHAPTER 12 Applying OP 4.10 on Indi
- Page 349 and 350: lack of opportunities relative to o
- Page 351 and 352: Box 12.2 When a project affects Ind
- Page 353 and 354: ples receive social and economic be
Box 9.5<br />
Process Framework for Involuntary Access Restrictions (continued)<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
Policy<br />
– agreement on basic principles, entitlement<br />
framework, criteria, and so forth<br />
– formal endorsement by the government<br />
Analysis and documentation<br />
– census, surveys as required<br />
– analysis of social groups, with special emphasis<br />
on risk and vulnerability<br />
Meaningful consultation and disclosure<br />
– documentation of consultation processes and<br />
implications for project design and implementation<br />
mechanisms<br />
■<br />
■<br />
– public disclosure of relevant information in local<br />
languages<br />
Action and mitigation plans<br />
– budget provision and clear responsibilities<br />
– supervision, monitoring, and evaluation mechanisms<br />
established<br />
Institutional capacity and commitment<br />
– evidence plans are realistic, can be implemented<br />
– responsible institutions and agencies identified<br />
Sources: World Bank 2005b.<br />
Qualifications of consultants for social assessment.<br />
The consultant or team of consultants should have the following<br />
qualifications:<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
practical experience in designing and implementing participatory<br />
natural resource management projects, in<br />
assessing and addressing interests of vulnerable people,<br />
and an ability to manage interdisciplinary teams<br />
detailed local knowledge of social issues related to natural<br />
resource management, including usage of forest and<br />
agriculture resources and community practices involving<br />
natural resources<br />
familiarity with the legal framework for usufruct rights<br />
and access<br />
experience with local forest or forest-related social issues<br />
operational experience in social survey methods<br />
ability to engage with local people and keep an open<br />
mind to new approaches<br />
ability to speak local languages<br />
Additional qualifications might include the following:<br />
extensive experience in microenterprise development;<br />
familiarity with microfinance and revolving fund<br />
options, marketing issues, and regulatory climate<br />
experience with assessing structure, capacity, and interlinkages<br />
of national and community-level organizations<br />
knowledge of national and local institutions<br />
extensive experience in community development and<br />
participatory planning<br />
■<br />
■<br />
operational experience in analysis and design of communication<br />
activities and dissemination materials<br />
extensive professional background in human resources<br />
development, including experience with training needs<br />
assessment, building analytical and problem-solving skills,<br />
and participative and interactive approaches to training<br />
Economic and financial analysis<br />
This analysis should examine the various economic and<br />
financial factors affecting a forest-related project to enhance<br />
the economic efficiency of the project and address distributional<br />
questions. An economic analysis compares economic<br />
and social benefits to the economy as a whole. The financial<br />
analysis compares revenue and expenses, like operations<br />
and maintenance costs.<br />
It is important to understand the economic value of<br />
forests that are affected by the project. In addition to forest<br />
products and services, this valuation should include nonmarket<br />
uses of forests, such as environmental services, social<br />
uses, and subsistence uses.<br />
In particular, the consultant should focus on the following<br />
key components for this analysis:<br />
Economic importance<br />
■<br />
evaluate direct use of forests arising from consumptive and<br />
nonconsumptive uses: timber, fruits, nuts, mushrooms,<br />
medicinal plants, forage, hunting and fishing, tourism and<br />
recreation, genetic resources, and educational uses<br />
304 CHAPTER 9:APPLYING FORESTS POLICY OP 4.36