Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network

Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network

hcvnetwork.org
from hcvnetwork.org More from this publisher
08.01.2014 Views

Besides channeling potential timber revenue away from national development efforts—particularly from the people living in and near the forests—the low prices at which these concessions are often granted encourage waste, unsustainable management, plundering for short-term gain, and replacement by less valuable and less sustainable activities. Strengthening of governance usually touches upon sensitive local and national interests, which are benefiting from the status quo. Furthermore, growing populations lead to an increase in the conversion of forests for other land uses (for example, clearing of forests for agriculture; see figure 1). The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates that each year 13 million hectares of forest are permanently converted to agriculture, mostly in the tropics. Spillovers from poor policies in other sectors can also contribute to rapid rates of deforestation. This has been particularly evident in recent decades, for example, in the conversion of forest areas to oil palm plantations in Indonesia. Although some forest products, primarily lumber and fuelwood, are delivered through markets, the economic value of many of the other forests goods and services (for example, environmental services, biodiversity, and carbon sequestration) go unrecognized by the market. Creative new mechanisms are needed to compensate those preserving environmental services and to provide incentives through market-based methods to reduce loss of forests’ environmental services. Safeguarding global public goods is not a national priority in countries struggling with problems of poverty reduction. As a result, forests’ potential is unexploited in developing countries because the forest sector has to compete for development investment and governments have limited interest in investing in the sector through loans when the benefits are often global rather than national or local. These investments must compete for resources against such high priority sectors as health, education, and infrastructure. Weak governance in the forest sector is pervasive and leads to ineffective use of funds. Forest authorities often lack the capacity to implement policy reforms and programs effectively and have limited capacity to access, and make use of, extra-budgetary financing. Furthermore, incentives for the private sector to implement sustainable forest management are either absent or limited. The forest sector represents one of the most challenging areas in the development of community and global public policy. Despite significant resource flows, international concern, and political pressure, a combination of market and institutional failures has led to forests failing to realize their potential to reduce poverty, promote economic growth, and be valued for their contributions to the local and global environment. Figure 1 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 Main Causes of Deforestation, by World Region, 1990–2000 Conversion of forest area to small-scale shifting agriculture Conversion of forest area to small-scale permanent agriculture and other land uses Conversion of forest area to large-scale permanent agriculture or other land uses Conversion to agricultural and forest plantations Africa Latin America Asia Pan- Tropical UNLOCKING FORESTS’ POTENTIAL The problem of sustainable forest management (SFM) is highly complex and can only be addressed by a range of actions targeted at (i) the policy framework, (ii) strengthening of governance, (iii) removal of market distortions and engaging market actors, (iv) full valuation and sharing of forest benefits through market and other mechanisms, (v) capacity building, and (vi) mobilization of adequate financial resources. Countering the drivers of deforestation and forest degradation to enable sustainable forest management will require, among other factors, greater innovation and better coordination in global forestry dialogue, national sectoral planning, and technical analysis that addresses these forces and factors. Capturing the potential of forests to advance poverty reduction, support economic growth, and deliver local and global environmental services will require donors to work in close coordination with governments, the private sector, and other key stakeholders in the forest sector, and to link forest sector activities with national strategies. This can involve working with emerging external constraints and opportunities. 2 INTRODUCTION: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN THE FOREST SECTOR

Forest law enforcement and governance. Loss and degradation resulting from weak forest law enforcement and governance have occurred at the expense not only of national economies, but also of the rural people who depend on forest resources for their livelihoods. This mismanagement translates into enormous national costs. For example, failure to collect appropriate royalties and taxes from legal forest operations has a global cost to governments of about US$5 billion annually. Illegal logging results in additional losses of forest resources from public lands of at least US$10 billion to US$15 billion a year. Improvements in forest law enforcement and governance are critical to capturing the full economic potential of forests in a sustainable manner. In response, a stronger global focus has been placed on forest sector governance, accountability, and transparency (see chapter 5, Improving Forest Governance). Private sector engagement. Because of forests’ significant commercial value, the private sector is the principal source of finance in forest production in most countries. Indeed, the level of activity and influence of the private sector in forests dwarfs that of the international community—and sometimes of the national government. Private investment in the forestry sector in developing countries and countries in transition is close to US$15 billion per year, or up to nine times more than the current official development assistance flows. 1 Official development assistance accounted for only a fraction of the funds available for forestry in the mid-1990s, and has declined sharply since then. Private sector investment—from both domestic and foreign sources—has been on the upswing. Given this trend of increased private engagement in forest production and processing, legal and regulatory frameworks that support sustainable forest practices must be developed to promote responsible private sector investment and corporate social responsibility as well as to eliminate corruption. To enhance the role of private sector investment in poverty alleviation, effective and efficient community-company partnerships and greater support to small and medium forest enterprises will be critical. Increased community engagement in forest management. Local communities, including indigenous and traditional groups, play an increasingly important role in forest management. Studies of the ownership and administration of forests anticipate that forest areas under recognized community ownership and reserved for community administration will nearly double between 2001 and 2015 (figure 2). Community participation in decision Figure 2 Million hectares 600 500 400 300 200 100 Community Ownership and Administration of Forests 0 1985 2001 2015 1985 2001 2015 Community owned Community administered Source: White and Martin 2002. making and implementation is considered essential for good governance, equitable distribution of benefits, and sustainable resource management. Additionally, it is important for creating accountability and transparency. Using forests for poverty reduction requires a strong institutional framework and an effective legal and regulatory environment, in which the rights of specific groups among the poor are recognized and protected (see note 1.3, Indigenous Peoples and Forests, and note 1.4, Property and Access Rights). Additionally, opportunities to develop sustainable forest businesses must be provided to the forestdependent poor and other groups (see note 2.2, Small and Medium Enterprises). Therefore, development organizations, in collaboration with government and other relevant stakeholders, need an approach that focuses on participation and conflict resolution, and not just on the technical and economic aspects of forestry. Coexistence of conservation and production. Conservation and production must coexist for the full potential of forests for poverty reduction to be realized. Although large areas of the world’s forests must be preserved intact for their ecological and cultural values, much of what remains will inevitably be used for productive purposes. Consequently, a dual approach covering both protection and productive use is needed. Greater investment in the development of plantations contributes to economic growth and poverty reduction while reducing pressure on natural forests and protecting some ecosystem services. Integration of forest conservation into productive landscapes can help achieve conservation objectives, enhance the benefits of conservation, and broaden the ownership of conservation initiatives (see note INTRODUCTION: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN THE FOREST SECTOR 3

Forest law enforcement and governance. Loss and<br />

degradation resulting from weak forest law enforcement and<br />

governance have occurred at the expense not only of<br />

national economies, but also of the rural people who depend<br />

on forest resources for their livelihoods. This<br />

mismanagement translates into enormous national costs.<br />

For example, failure to collect appropriate royalties and taxes<br />

from legal forest operations has a global cost to governments<br />

of about US$5 billion annually. Illegal logging results in<br />

additional losses of forest resources from public lands of at<br />

least US$10 billion to US$15 billion a year. Improvements in<br />

forest law enforcement and governance are critical to<br />

capturing the full economic potential of forests in a<br />

sustainable manner. In response, a stronger global focus has<br />

been placed on forest sector governance, accountability, and<br />

transparency (see chapter 5, Improving Forest Governance).<br />

Private sector engagement. Because of forests’ significant<br />

commercial value, the private sector is the principal source of<br />

finance in forest production in most countries. Indeed, the<br />

level of activity and influence of the private sector in forests<br />

dwarfs that of the international community—and<br />

sometimes of the national government. Private investment<br />

in the forestry sector in developing countries and countries<br />

in transition is close to US$15 billion per year, or up to nine<br />

times more than the current official development assistance<br />

flows. 1 Official development assistance accounted for only a<br />

fraction of the funds available for forestry in the mid-1990s,<br />

and has declined sharply since then.<br />

Private sector investment—from both domestic and foreign<br />

sources—has been on the upswing. Given this trend of<br />

increased private engagement in forest production and processing,<br />

legal and regulatory frameworks that support sustainable<br />

forest practices must be developed to promote<br />

responsible private sector investment and corporate social<br />

responsibility as well as to eliminate corruption. To enhance<br />

the role of private sector investment in poverty alleviation,<br />

effective and efficient community-company partnerships<br />

and greater support to small and medium forest enterprises<br />

will be critical.<br />

Increased community engagement in forest<br />

management. Local communities, including indigenous<br />

and traditional groups, play an increasingly important role<br />

in forest management. Studies of the ownership and<br />

administration of forests anticipate that forest areas under<br />

recognized community ownership and reserved for<br />

community administration will nearly double between 2001<br />

and 2015 (figure 2). Community participation in decision<br />

Figure 2<br />

Million hectares<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

Community Ownership and Administration<br />

of <strong>Forests</strong><br />

0<br />

1985 2001 2015 1985 2001 2015<br />

Community owned Community administered<br />

Source: White and Martin 2002.<br />

making and implementation is considered essential for<br />

good governance, equitable distribution of benefits, and<br />

sustainable resource management. Additionally, it is<br />

important for creating accountability and transparency.<br />

Using forests for poverty reduction requires a strong<br />

institutional framework and an effective legal and regulatory<br />

environment, in which the rights of specific groups<br />

among the poor are recognized and protected (see note 1.3,<br />

Indigenous Peoples and <strong>Forests</strong>, and note 1.4, Property and<br />

Access Rights). Additionally, opportunities to develop sustainable<br />

forest businesses must be provided to the forestdependent<br />

poor and other groups (see note 2.2, Small and<br />

Medium Enterprises). Therefore, development organizations,<br />

in collaboration with government and other relevant<br />

stakeholders, need an approach that focuses on participation<br />

and conflict resolution, and not just on the technical<br />

and economic aspects of forestry.<br />

Coexistence of conservation and production.<br />

Conservation and production must coexist for the full<br />

potential of forests for poverty reduction to be realized.<br />

Although large areas of the world’s forests must be preserved<br />

intact for their ecological and cultural values, much of what<br />

remains will inevitably be used for productive purposes.<br />

Consequently, a dual approach covering both protection and<br />

productive use is needed.<br />

Greater investment in the development of plantations<br />

contributes to economic growth and poverty reduction<br />

while reducing pressure on natural forests and protecting<br />

some ecosystem services. Integration of forest conservation<br />

into productive landscapes can help achieve conservation<br />

objectives, enhance the benefits of conservation, and<br />

broaden the ownership of conservation initiatives (see note<br />

INTRODUCTION: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN THE FOREST SECTOR 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!