Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network

of or reforms in one sector provides the government with
“easy money” and causes the government to lose control of
fiscal expenditure. Elements of the safeguard and analytical
approaches for World Bank investment lending projects
may apply to aspects of these cases. These situations, however,
will also have large secondary and tertiary impacts
throughout the economy that parallel those associated with
macroeconomic policy reforms.
3. Local Agenda 21 is a local-government-led, communitywide,
and participatory effort to establish a comprehensive
action strategy for environmental protection, economic
prosperity and community well-being in the local jurisdiction
or area. This requires the integration of planning and
action across economic, social, and environmental spheres.
Key elements are full community participation, assessment
of current conditions, target setting for achieving specific
goals, monitoring, and reporting. Source: http://www.gdrc
.org/uem/la21/la21.html.
SELECTED READINGS
Schmithüsen, F., K. Bisang, and W. Zimmermann. 2001.
“Cross-Sector Linkages in Forestry: Review of Available
Information and Consideration on Future Research.”
Forest Policy and Forest Economics, Department of Forest
Sciences—ETH, Zurich. http://www.fao.org/docrep/
003/AA002E/Aa002e03.htm#6018.
World Bank. 2004. “Good Practice Note on Environmental
and Natural Resource Aspects of Development Policy
Lending.” World Bank, Washington, DC.
———. 2005a. “Azerbaijan: Issues and Options Associated
with Energy Sector Reform.” Report No. 32371-AZ,
World Bank, Washington, DC.
———. 2005b. “Development Policy Lending and Forest
Outcomes: Influences, Interactions, and Due Diligence.”
Report No. 32724-GLB, Agriculture and Rural Development
Department, World Bank, Washington, DC.
REFERENCES CITED
Angelsen, A., and D. Kaimowitz. 1999. “Rethinking the
Causes of Deforestation: Lessons from Economic Models.”
World Bank Research Observer 14(1): 73–98.
Bray, D. B., L. Merino-Perez, and D. Barry, eds. 2005. The
Community Forests of Mexico: Managing for Sustainable
Landscapes. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Douglas, J., and D. Chandrasekharan Behr. 2006. “Note #1:
Prioritizing Where Cross Sector Impacts Matter.” Note
submitted to World Bank as input to Forests Sourcebook.
Unpublished. World Bank. Washington, DC.
Gueorguieva, A., and K. Bolt. 2003. “A CriticalReview of the
Literature on Structural Adjustment and the Environment.”
Environment Department Papers No. 90. World
Bank, Washington, DC.
Humphreys, D. 1996. “The Global Politics of Forest Conservation
Since the UNCED.” Environmental Politics 5(2):
231–57
Kaimowitz, D., C. Vallejos, P. Pacheco and R. Lopez. 1998.
“Municipal Governments and Forest Management in
Lowland Bolivia.” Journal of Environment and Development
7(1).
Lampietti, J. 2004. “Power’s Promise: Electricity Reforms in
Eastern Europe and Central Asia.” Working Paper No. 40.
World Bank, Washington, DC.
Mani, M. 2004. “An Overview of Environmental and Natural
Resource Aspects of IBRD Financed Development
Policy Lending Operations in FY05.” ENV-ESSD, internal
note. World Bank, Washington, DC.
Munasinghe, M. 2001. “Special Topic I: Structural Adjustment
Policies and the Environment.” Environment and
Development Economics 4(1): 9–18.
OPCS (Operations Policy and Country Services). 2004.
“Good Practice Notes Relating to the Development Policy
Lending OP/BP 8.60: Environmental and Natural
Resource Aspects.” World Bank, Washington, DC.
Pandey, K., and D. Wheeler. 2001. “Structural Adjustment
and Forest Resources: The Impact of World Bank Operations.”
Policy Research Working Paper 2584. World
Bank, Washington, DC.
Sedjo, R. A. 2005. “Macroeconomics and Forest Sustainability
in the Developing World: Resources for the Future.” Discussion
Paper DP 05-47. World Bank, Washington, DC.
Sunderlin, W.D., O. Ndoye, H. Bikié, N. Laporte, B.
Mertens, and J. Pokam. 2000. “Economic Crisis, Small-
Scale Agriculture, and Forest Cover Change in Southern
Cameroon.” Environmental Conservation 27(3): 284–90.
UN-CSD (United Nations Commission on Sustainable
Development). 1997. Report of the Ad Hoc Intergovernmental
Panel on Forests. E/CN.17/1997/12. United
Nations, New York.
UNECE (Economic Commission for Europe) 2004. Environmental
Performance Reviews, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
New York and Geneva: United Nations. http://www.unece.
org/env/epr/epr_studies/bosnia_and_herzegovina.pdf
World Bank. 2004a. Sustaining Forests: A Development Strategy.
Washington, DC: World Bank.
———. 2004b. “Azerbaijan Raising Rates: Short-Term
Implications of Residential Electricity Tariff Rebalancing.”
Report No. 30749-AZ. Europe and Central Asia
Region. Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development.
World Bank, Washington DC.
CHAPTER 6: MAINSTREAMING FORESTS INTO DEVELOPMENT POLICY AND PLANNING 211