08.01.2014 Views

Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network

Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network

Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

the transformation process has leadership, top-level<br />

management commitment, and broadly based stakeholder<br />

participation;<br />

implementation is carried out through an independent<br />

and influential change team or steering committee;<br />

structure follows strategy: careful planning should set the<br />

foundation, but determination and speed are necessary<br />

for success during implementation;<br />

“quick win” achievable subtargets are set to help create<br />

and maintain momentum;<br />

people are actively engaged to build ownership from the<br />

very beginning of the change journey;<br />

second- and third-level management, key to success, adequately<br />

buy in; and<br />

communication and information, essential for both internal<br />

and external audiences, are professionally prepared.<br />

Capacity considerations. Reforms of forest institutions<br />

must be linked to building necessary capacity. The management<br />

objectives for service delivery organizations are to<br />

provide forest goods and services for forest industries and<br />

for households while maintaining the forest’s ability to provide<br />

public goods (such as watershed protection and biodiversity<br />

conservation). Implicit in the idea of forest organizations<br />

as service delivery institutions is that their services<br />

are provided to meet the demands of both private and community<br />

forest users. Some forest institutions may have the<br />

necessary capacity and simply require redeployment of<br />

these capacities. In most cases, however, the requisite capacity<br />

is not available, underscoring the importance of appropriate<br />

training.<br />

Assessing success. Measures should be in place to assess<br />

the success of institutional reforms. Measurement of success<br />

could be based on overall sectoral performance, including<br />

improved forest management, greater investment and job<br />

creation in the industry, stronger financial performance of<br />

both private and public institutions, better environmental<br />

protection, improved protected area management, and<br />

greater benefit for civil society. However, even in the bestrun<br />

forest management organizations, these parameters are<br />

seldom assessed in any systematic way. Thus, innovative<br />

approaches to assessing performance must be introduced<br />

that enable policy makers to determine whether public<br />

expenditures are achieving desired outcomes (see box 5.11).<br />

LESSONS LEARNED AND RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

Box 5.10<br />

Measures for Transparent Budget Procedures<br />

Measures proposed for countries in transition in<br />

Europe and Central Asia to increase transparent<br />

budget procedures and enhance accounting systems<br />

include the following:<br />

■<br />

■<br />

To assign the responsibility for controlling forest<br />

harvesting and management to state forest administration.<br />

To determine appropriate funding for state forest<br />

management, physical targets for forest management<br />

and environmental conservation should be<br />

defined, and necessary investment requirements and<br />

operational costs assessed. Funding requirements<br />

may include ensuring cost efficiency of forest operations<br />

by using subcontractors from the private sector<br />

when possible; carrying out independent<br />

research on efficiency factors; establishing the transfer<br />

to the state budget based on a residual amount<br />

determined by deducting estimated costs from total<br />

Source: PROFOR 2003.<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

revenue (allowing efficiency gains to remain in the<br />

organization as an incentive for improved performance).<br />

Financial auditing through accredited third-party<br />

auditors should be arranged.<br />

An independent budget for the entity managing<br />

state forests should be established (to assist in<br />

increasing productivity and efficiency in state forest<br />

management). The budget should be associated<br />

with well-defined obligations toward the state<br />

budget, and development of salary schemes should<br />

be based on staff performance to reduce incentives<br />

for corruption.<br />

Marketing of timber and nonwood forest products<br />

based on competitive bidding should be arranged to<br />

establish fair, market-based prices; ensure open and<br />

equal access to timber and nonwood resources for<br />

potential beneficiaries at equitable conditions; and<br />

limit monopolistic features in resource supply.<br />

170 CHAPTER 5: IMPROVING FOREST GOVERNANCE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!