Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network
Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network
Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
the transformation process has leadership, top-level<br />
management commitment, and broadly based stakeholder<br />
participation;<br />
implementation is carried out through an independent<br />
and influential change team or steering committee;<br />
structure follows strategy: careful planning should set the<br />
foundation, but determination and speed are necessary<br />
for success during implementation;<br />
“quick win” achievable subtargets are set to help create<br />
and maintain momentum;<br />
people are actively engaged to build ownership from the<br />
very beginning of the change journey;<br />
second- and third-level management, key to success, adequately<br />
buy in; and<br />
communication and information, essential for both internal<br />
and external audiences, are professionally prepared.<br />
Capacity considerations. Reforms of forest institutions<br />
must be linked to building necessary capacity. The management<br />
objectives for service delivery organizations are to<br />
provide forest goods and services for forest industries and<br />
for households while maintaining the forest’s ability to provide<br />
public goods (such as watershed protection and biodiversity<br />
conservation). Implicit in the idea of forest organizations<br />
as service delivery institutions is that their services<br />
are provided to meet the demands of both private and community<br />
forest users. Some forest institutions may have the<br />
necessary capacity and simply require redeployment of<br />
these capacities. In most cases, however, the requisite capacity<br />
is not available, underscoring the importance of appropriate<br />
training.<br />
Assessing success. Measures should be in place to assess<br />
the success of institutional reforms. Measurement of success<br />
could be based on overall sectoral performance, including<br />
improved forest management, greater investment and job<br />
creation in the industry, stronger financial performance of<br />
both private and public institutions, better environmental<br />
protection, improved protected area management, and<br />
greater benefit for civil society. However, even in the bestrun<br />
forest management organizations, these parameters are<br />
seldom assessed in any systematic way. Thus, innovative<br />
approaches to assessing performance must be introduced<br />
that enable policy makers to determine whether public<br />
expenditures are achieving desired outcomes (see box 5.11).<br />
LESSONS LEARNED AND RECOMMENDATIONS<br />
Box 5.10<br />
Measures for Transparent Budget Procedures<br />
Measures proposed for countries in transition in<br />
Europe and Central Asia to increase transparent<br />
budget procedures and enhance accounting systems<br />
include the following:<br />
■<br />
■<br />
To assign the responsibility for controlling forest<br />
harvesting and management to state forest administration.<br />
To determine appropriate funding for state forest<br />
management, physical targets for forest management<br />
and environmental conservation should be<br />
defined, and necessary investment requirements and<br />
operational costs assessed. Funding requirements<br />
may include ensuring cost efficiency of forest operations<br />
by using subcontractors from the private sector<br />
when possible; carrying out independent<br />
research on efficiency factors; establishing the transfer<br />
to the state budget based on a residual amount<br />
determined by deducting estimated costs from total<br />
Source: PROFOR 2003.<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
revenue (allowing efficiency gains to remain in the<br />
organization as an incentive for improved performance).<br />
Financial auditing through accredited third-party<br />
auditors should be arranged.<br />
An independent budget for the entity managing<br />
state forests should be established (to assist in<br />
increasing productivity and efficiency in state forest<br />
management). The budget should be associated<br />
with well-defined obligations toward the state<br />
budget, and development of salary schemes should<br />
be based on staff performance to reduce incentives<br />
for corruption.<br />
Marketing of timber and nonwood forest products<br />
based on competitive bidding should be arranged to<br />
establish fair, market-based prices; ensure open and<br />
equal access to timber and nonwood resources for<br />
potential beneficiaries at equitable conditions; and<br />
limit monopolistic features in resource supply.<br />
170 CHAPTER 5: IMPROVING FOREST GOVERNANCE