Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network
Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network
Lee, K. N. 1993. Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Washington, DC: Island Press. Margoluis, R., V. Russell, M. Gonzalez, O. Rojas, J. Magdaleno, G. Madrid, and D. Kaimowitz. 2001. “Maximum Yield? Sustainable Agriculture as a Tool for Conservation.” Biodiversity Support Program, Washington, DC. Margoluis, R., and N. Salafsky. 1998. Measures of Success: Designing, Managing, and Monitoring Conservation and Development Projects. Washington, DC: Island Press. Morgan, A., and Foundations of Success. 2005. “Basic Guidance for Cross-Cutting Tools: Conceptual Models.” Worldwide Fund for Nature, Gland, Switzerland. The Nature Conservancy. “Conservation Action Planning Resources.” http://conserveonline.org/workspaces. Salafsky, N., R. Margoluis, and K. Redford. 2001. “Adaptive Management: A Tool for Conservation Practitioners.” Publication No. 112, Biodiversity Support Program, Washington, DC. http://www.fosonline.org/Site_Docs/ AdaptiveManagementTool.pdf. 150 CHAPTER 4: OPTIMIZING FOREST FUNCTIONS IN A LANDSCAPE
CHAPTER 5 IMPROVING FOREST GOVERNANCE Forest sector governance refers to the ways in which officials and institutions (both formal and informal) acquire and exercise authority in the management of the resources of the sector to sustain and improve the welfare and quality of life for those whose livelihoods depend on the sector. 1 Good governance is fundamental to achieving positive and sustained development outcomes in the sector, including efficiency of resource management, increased contribution to economic growth and to environmental services, and equitable distribution of benefits. Good forest governance is characterized by predictable, open, and informed policy making based on transparent processes, a bureaucracy imbued with a professional ethos, an executive arm of government accountable for its actions, and a strong civil society participating in decisions related to sector management and in other public affairs—and all behaving under the rule of law. Thus, key features of good governance include adherence to the rule of law, transparency and low levels of corruption, inputs of all stakeholders in decision making, accountability of all officials, low regulatory burden, and political stability (see also World Bank 2000). The rationale for the World Bank to engage in improving forest governance in client countries is twofold. On one hand, broader governance reform processes, such as decentralization and devolution, and public sector reforms present direct opportunities to which the forest sector needs to respond. On the other hand, illegal logging, corruption, and other forest sector crimes, such as arson, poaching, land encroachment, trade in endangered fauna and flora, and evasion of legal taxes and royalties, indicate weaknesses in forest sector governance that need to be addressed. In developing countries, illegal logging in public lands alone causes estimated losses in assets and revenue in excess of US$10 billion annually, more than six times the total official development assistance dedicated to the sustainable management of forests. In addition, about US$5 billion per year is estimated to be lost to uncollected taxes and royalties on legally sanctioned timber harvests, as a result of corruption (World Bank 2004). The global magnitude of the problem as estimated by its direct monetary impacts is staggering. 2 The associated physical, environmental, and social impacts resulting from poor governance are even more extensive and serious. They are characterized by the following: ■ ■ ■ Violation of protected area boundaries threatens the conservation of forest resources and biodiversity. More than 350 million rural poor rely heavily on forests for their livelihoods, while more than 60 million depend almost exclusively on them for subsistence. Strong forest governance (including vesting tenurial rights with such communities) is essential for protecting their livelihoods and improving their well-being, and for protecting them from the consequences of illegal logging and unauthorized removals from the forest (World Bank 2006). Legitimate forest enterprises are subjected to unfair competition through price undercutting and discouraged from making socially and environmentally responsible investments in the sector. 151
- Page 100 and 101: operations (such as community-based
- Page 102 and 103: also needs to be extended in many c
- Page 104 and 105: NOTE 3.1 Mainstreaming Conservation
- Page 106 and 107: areas that can be used more intensi
- Page 108 and 109: Box 3.7 Applying HCVF in Papua New
- Page 110 and 111: Finally, any existing protections,
- Page 112 and 113: However, these general rules are se
- Page 114 and 115: the origin of products from a certi
- Page 116 and 117: management practices in selected en
- Page 118 and 119: Reforms) provide the framework for
- Page 120 and 121: lenges to weak institutions, which
- Page 123 and 124: CHAPTER 4 Optimizing Forest Functio
- Page 125 and 126: People and human societies are seen
- Page 127 and 128: Encourage stakeholder participation
- Page 129 and 130: Box 4.5 Tradeoffs Framework Used in
- Page 131 and 132: Sector and Thematic Evaluation, Ope
- Page 133 and 134: Identify planning team members and
- Page 135 and 136: Involve relevant stakeholders in de
- Page 137 and 138: needs of implementing partners and
- Page 139 and 140: NOTE 4.2 Assessing Outcomes of Land
- Page 141 and 142: Box 4.13 Possible Indicators for As
- Page 143 and 144: NOTE 4.3 Using Adaptive Management
- Page 145 and 146: ■ ■ ■ ■ Develop a project p
- Page 147 and 148: Another important and useful proces
- Page 149: theless, it is never too late to st
- Page 153 and 154: Improving forest governance and leg
- Page 155 and 156: tant part of the World Bank’s con
- Page 157 and 158: sector with broader governance and
- Page 159 and 160: NOTE 5.1 Decentralized Forest Manag
- Page 161 and 162: Assess the overall decentralization
- Page 163 and 164: Box 5.5 Nicaragua: Asymmetries Betw
- Page 165 and 166: Parker, A. 1995. “Decentralizatio
- Page 167 and 168: ■ ■ ■ Management of forests (
- Page 169 and 170: such as designing a transparent con
- Page 171 and 172: Box 5.11 Citizen Report Cards: Benc
- Page 173 and 174: NOTE 5.3 Strengthening Legal Framew
- Page 175 and 176: Box 5.13 Working on the Law with La
- Page 177 and 178: In addition, the process of public
- Page 179 and 180: ANNEX 5.3B SIX DRAFTING PRINCIPLES
- Page 181 and 182: forestry policy or to promote other
- Page 183 and 184: The most common fiscal incentives i
- Page 185 and 186: is reasonable to allow the administ
- Page 187 and 188: ANNEX 5.4A A SUMMARY OF THE DIFFERE
- Page 189 and 190: NOTE 5.5 ADDRESSING ILLEGAL LOGGING
- Page 191 and 192: Box 5.17 Measures Specific to Comba
- Page 193 and 194: ■ ■ ■ initially have to compe
- Page 195 and 196: enterprises may be motivated to joi
- Page 197 and 198: NOTES 1. This note is based on Worl
- Page 199 and 200: ANNEX 5.5B TYPICAL CONTEXTS OF ILLE
CHAPTER 5<br />
IMPROVING FOREST GOVERNANCE<br />
Forest sector governance refers to the ways in which<br />
officials and institutions (both formal and informal)<br />
acquire and exercise authority in the management of<br />
the resources of the sector to sustain and improve the welfare<br />
and quality of life for those whose livelihoods depend<br />
on the sector. 1 Good governance is fundamental to achieving<br />
positive and sustained development outcomes in the<br />
sector, including efficiency of resource management,<br />
increased contribution to economic growth and to environmental<br />
services, and equitable distribution of benefits.<br />
Good forest governance is characterized by predictable,<br />
open, and informed policy making based on transparent<br />
processes, a bureaucracy imbued with a professional ethos, an<br />
executive arm of government accountable for its actions, and<br />
a strong civil society participating in decisions related to sector<br />
management and in other public affairs—and all behaving<br />
under the rule of law. Thus, key features of good governance<br />
include adherence to the rule of law, transparency and<br />
low levels of corruption, inputs of all stakeholders in decision<br />
making, accountability of all officials, low regulatory burden,<br />
and political stability (see also World Bank 2000).<br />
The rationale for the World Bank to engage in improving<br />
forest governance in client countries is twofold. On one<br />
hand, broader governance reform processes, such as decentralization<br />
and devolution, and public sector reforms present<br />
direct opportunities to which the forest sector needs to<br />
respond. On the other hand, illegal logging, corruption, and<br />
other forest sector crimes, such as arson, poaching, land<br />
encroachment, trade in endangered fauna and flora, and<br />
evasion of legal taxes and royalties, indicate weaknesses in<br />
forest sector governance that need to be addressed. In developing<br />
countries, illegal logging in public lands alone causes<br />
estimated losses in assets and revenue in excess of US$10<br />
billion annually, more than six times the total official development<br />
assistance dedicated to the sustainable management<br />
of forests. In addition, about US$5 billion per year is estimated<br />
to be lost to uncollected taxes and royalties on legally<br />
sanctioned timber harvests, as a result of corruption (World<br />
Bank 2004). The global magnitude of the problem as estimated<br />
by its direct monetary impacts is staggering. 2<br />
The associated physical, environmental, and social<br />
impacts resulting from poor governance are even more extensive<br />
and serious. They are characterized by the following:<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
Violation of protected area boundaries threatens the<br />
conservation of forest resources and biodiversity.<br />
More than 350 million rural poor rely heavily on forests<br />
for their livelihoods, while more than 60 million depend<br />
almost exclusively on them for subsistence. Strong forest<br />
governance (including vesting tenurial rights with such<br />
communities) is essential for protecting their livelihoods<br />
and improving their well-being, and for protecting them<br />
from the consequences of illegal logging and unauthorized<br />
removals from the forest (World Bank 2006).<br />
Legitimate forest enterprises are subjected to unfair competition<br />
through price undercutting and discouraged<br />
from making socially and environmentally responsible<br />
investments in the sector.<br />
151