Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network
Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network
CHAPTER 1 Forests for Poverty Reduction The majority of the world’s poor are concentrated in rural areas and, consequently, depend on natural resources, over which they exercise little control, for their livelihoods. It is estimated that 60 million Indigenous Peoples are totally dependent on forests, 350 million people are highly forest dependent, and 1.2 billion are dependent on agroforestry. The scale and significance of poverty issues on forest lands demand that poverty alleviation efforts give special attention to forest areas and the people living in them. Poor rural families depend heavily on “wild” resources; in both forest-poor and forest-rich contexts, forest products are used for fuel, food, medicines, construction materials, fertilizers, and cash. Reliance on these resources often increases in times of personal, family, or social hardship, with these wild resources being especially important for women, children, and ethnic minorities. In many cases, as people get richer, they use and sell fewer of the forest products that are considered inferior goods. However, most people in Sub-Saharan Africa have not gotten richer, resulting in growing markets for all forest products as populations and urbanization increase. A similar situation is found in the poorer regions of Asia. (See box 1.1.) Smallholders living in forest margins in diverse parts of the world earn 10–25 percent of their household incomes from nontimber forest products, many of which are either undervalued or omitted completely from conventional economic income statistics (see Note 1.1, Mainstreaming the Role of Forests in Poverty Alleviation; Ndoye, Ruiz Pérez, and Eyebe 1999). Studies of income from indigenous natural resource management and small-scale local forest enterprises in a number of countries in Africa, and joint forest management in Madhya Pradesh state in India, are but a few of the studies showing the significant impacts of these activities on the income of poor people (see Monela et al. 2004; Box 1.1 What Do We Mean by Poverty? Poverty is a multidimensional concept, the measurement of which continues to be debated. A detailed overview of poverty concepts is provided in the World Bank’s World Development Report on Attacking Poverty (World Bank 2001). This report states that poverty is not solely about material deprivation, but is also related to broader notions of risk, vulnerability, social inclusion, and opportunities. Poverty encompasses all forms of deprivation that prevent a person from achieving his or her aspirations. This broader definition of poverty has policy implications because it underscores the positive interactions of interventions in a broad set of welfare dimensions. In practice, it implies that the nature of the problem must influence selection of the appropriate welfare measure. Source: Authors’ compilation from World Bank 2001. 15
- Page 1 and 2: INTRODUCTION OPPORTUNITIES AND CHAL
- Page 3 and 4: Forest law enforcement and governan
- Page 5 and 6: ■ Protecting vital local and glob
- Page 7 and 8: Figure 3 Commitment from the World
- Page 9 and 10: Figure 6 Regional Distribution of I
- Page 11 and 12: management and biodiversity conserv
- Page 13: PART I Priority Themes and Operatio
- Page 17 and 18: A summary of the salient features o
- Page 19 and 20: Box 1.3 Forests for Poverty Allevia
- Page 21 and 22: ural poor households do not have se
- Page 23 and 24: Frameworks, regulations, and encour
- Page 25 and 26: NOTE 1.1 Mainstreaming the Role of
- Page 27 and 28: Box 1.5 Entry Points for Reassessin
- Page 29 and 30: Box 1.8 Identifying Opportunities f
- Page 31 and 32: Box 1.9 Community Forestry Models a
- Page 33 and 34: Box 1.11 Improving Equity and Gover
- Page 35 and 36: Box 1.13 The Forest Sector in Camer
- Page 37 and 38: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
- Page 39 and 40: NOTE 1.3 Indigenous Peoples and For
- Page 41 and 42: ■ ■ ■ ■ tenure adjudication
- Page 43 and 44: manage expectations, and address gr
- Page 45 and 46: local communities. They require tim
- Page 47 and 48: with Indigenous Peoples can offer.
- Page 49 and 50: NOTE 1.4 Property and Access Rights
- Page 51 and 52: Box 1.18 Typology of Property Right
- Page 53 and 54: Box 1.19 Characteristics of Secure
- Page 55 and 56: SELECTED READINGS Alden Wily, L. 20
- Page 57 and 58: Historically, low-income producers
- Page 59 and 60: Box 1.23 Market Analysis and Develo
- Page 61: (Scherr, White, and Kaimowitz 2003)
CHAPTER 1<br />
<strong>Forests</strong> for Poverty Reduction<br />
The majority of the world’s poor are concentrated in<br />
rural areas and, consequently, depend on natural<br />
resources, over which they exercise little control,<br />
for their livelihoods. It is estimated that 60 million Indigenous<br />
Peoples are totally dependent on forests, 350 million<br />
people are highly forest dependent, and 1.2 billion are<br />
dependent on agroforestry. The scale and significance of<br />
poverty issues on forest lands demand that poverty alleviation<br />
efforts give special attention to forest areas and the people<br />
living in them.<br />
Poor rural families depend heavily on “wild” resources;<br />
in both forest-poor and forest-rich contexts, forest products<br />
are used for fuel, food, medicines, construction materials,<br />
fertilizers, and cash. Reliance on these resources often<br />
increases in times of personal, family, or social hardship,<br />
with these wild resources being especially important for<br />
women, children, and ethnic minorities. In many cases, as<br />
people get richer, they use and sell fewer of the forest products<br />
that are considered inferior goods. However, most people<br />
in Sub-Saharan Africa have not gotten richer, resulting<br />
in growing markets for all forest products as populations<br />
and urbanization increase. A similar situation is found in<br />
the poorer regions of Asia. (See box 1.1.)<br />
Smallholders living in forest margins in diverse parts of<br />
the world earn 10–25 percent of their household incomes<br />
from nontimber forest products, many of which are either<br />
undervalued or omitted completely from conventional economic<br />
income statistics (see Note 1.1, Mainstreaming the<br />
Role of <strong>Forests</strong> in Poverty Alleviation; Ndoye, Ruiz Pérez,<br />
and Eyebe 1999). Studies of income from indigenous natural<br />
resource management and small-scale local forest enterprises<br />
in a number of countries in Africa, and joint forest<br />
management in Madhya Pradesh state in India, are but a few<br />
of the studies showing the significant impacts of these activities<br />
on the income of poor people (see Monela et al. 2004;<br />
Box 1.1<br />
What Do We Mean by Poverty?<br />
Poverty is a multidimensional concept, the measurement<br />
of which continues to be debated. A<br />
detailed overview of poverty concepts is provided<br />
in the World Bank’s World Development Report on<br />
Attacking Poverty (World Bank 2001). This report<br />
states that poverty is not solely about material deprivation,<br />
but is also related to broader notions of<br />
risk, vulnerability, social inclusion, and opportunities.<br />
Poverty encompasses all forms of deprivation<br />
that prevent a person from achieving his or her<br />
aspirations.<br />
This broader definition of poverty has policy<br />
implications because it underscores the positive<br />
interactions of interventions in a broad set of welfare<br />
dimensions. In practice, it implies that the<br />
nature of the problem must influence selection of<br />
the appropriate welfare measure.<br />
Source: Authors’ compilation from World Bank 2001.<br />
15