Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network

Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network

hcvnetwork.org
from hcvnetwork.org More from this publisher
08.01.2014 Views

CHAPTER 1 Forests for Poverty Reduction The majority of the world’s poor are concentrated in rural areas and, consequently, depend on natural resources, over which they exercise little control, for their livelihoods. It is estimated that 60 million Indigenous Peoples are totally dependent on forests, 350 million people are highly forest dependent, and 1.2 billion are dependent on agroforestry. The scale and significance of poverty issues on forest lands demand that poverty alleviation efforts give special attention to forest areas and the people living in them. Poor rural families depend heavily on “wild” resources; in both forest-poor and forest-rich contexts, forest products are used for fuel, food, medicines, construction materials, fertilizers, and cash. Reliance on these resources often increases in times of personal, family, or social hardship, with these wild resources being especially important for women, children, and ethnic minorities. In many cases, as people get richer, they use and sell fewer of the forest products that are considered inferior goods. However, most people in Sub-Saharan Africa have not gotten richer, resulting in growing markets for all forest products as populations and urbanization increase. A similar situation is found in the poorer regions of Asia. (See box 1.1.) Smallholders living in forest margins in diverse parts of the world earn 10–25 percent of their household incomes from nontimber forest products, many of which are either undervalued or omitted completely from conventional economic income statistics (see Note 1.1, Mainstreaming the Role of Forests in Poverty Alleviation; Ndoye, Ruiz Pérez, and Eyebe 1999). Studies of income from indigenous natural resource management and small-scale local forest enterprises in a number of countries in Africa, and joint forest management in Madhya Pradesh state in India, are but a few of the studies showing the significant impacts of these activities on the income of poor people (see Monela et al. 2004; Box 1.1 What Do We Mean by Poverty? Poverty is a multidimensional concept, the measurement of which continues to be debated. A detailed overview of poverty concepts is provided in the World Bank’s World Development Report on Attacking Poverty (World Bank 2001). This report states that poverty is not solely about material deprivation, but is also related to broader notions of risk, vulnerability, social inclusion, and opportunities. Poverty encompasses all forms of deprivation that prevent a person from achieving his or her aspirations. This broader definition of poverty has policy implications because it underscores the positive interactions of interventions in a broad set of welfare dimensions. In practice, it implies that the nature of the problem must influence selection of the appropriate welfare measure. Source: Authors’ compilation from World Bank 2001. 15

CHAPTER 1<br />

<strong>Forests</strong> for Poverty Reduction<br />

The majority of the world’s poor are concentrated in<br />

rural areas and, consequently, depend on natural<br />

resources, over which they exercise little control,<br />

for their livelihoods. It is estimated that 60 million Indigenous<br />

Peoples are totally dependent on forests, 350 million<br />

people are highly forest dependent, and 1.2 billion are<br />

dependent on agroforestry. The scale and significance of<br />

poverty issues on forest lands demand that poverty alleviation<br />

efforts give special attention to forest areas and the people<br />

living in them.<br />

Poor rural families depend heavily on “wild” resources;<br />

in both forest-poor and forest-rich contexts, forest products<br />

are used for fuel, food, medicines, construction materials,<br />

fertilizers, and cash. Reliance on these resources often<br />

increases in times of personal, family, or social hardship,<br />

with these wild resources being especially important for<br />

women, children, and ethnic minorities. In many cases, as<br />

people get richer, they use and sell fewer of the forest products<br />

that are considered inferior goods. However, most people<br />

in Sub-Saharan Africa have not gotten richer, resulting<br />

in growing markets for all forest products as populations<br />

and urbanization increase. A similar situation is found in<br />

the poorer regions of Asia. (See box 1.1.)<br />

Smallholders living in forest margins in diverse parts of<br />

the world earn 10–25 percent of their household incomes<br />

from nontimber forest products, many of which are either<br />

undervalued or omitted completely from conventional economic<br />

income statistics (see Note 1.1, Mainstreaming the<br />

Role of <strong>Forests</strong> in Poverty Alleviation; Ndoye, Ruiz Pérez,<br />

and Eyebe 1999). Studies of income from indigenous natural<br />

resource management and small-scale local forest enterprises<br />

in a number of countries in Africa, and joint forest<br />

management in Madhya Pradesh state in India, are but a few<br />

of the studies showing the significant impacts of these activities<br />

on the income of poor people (see Monela et al. 2004;<br />

Box 1.1<br />

What Do We Mean by Poverty?<br />

Poverty is a multidimensional concept, the measurement<br />

of which continues to be debated. A<br />

detailed overview of poverty concepts is provided<br />

in the World Bank’s World Development Report on<br />

Attacking Poverty (World Bank 2001). This report<br />

states that poverty is not solely about material deprivation,<br />

but is also related to broader notions of<br />

risk, vulnerability, social inclusion, and opportunities.<br />

Poverty encompasses all forms of deprivation<br />

that prevent a person from achieving his or her<br />

aspirations.<br />

This broader definition of poverty has policy<br />

implications because it underscores the positive<br />

interactions of interventions in a broad set of welfare<br />

dimensions. In practice, it implies that the<br />

nature of the problem must influence selection of<br />

the appropriate welfare measure.<br />

Source: Authors’ compilation from World Bank 2001.<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!