Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network
Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network
Box 4.1 What Is a Landscape Approach? The landscape approach should incorporate the following elements: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Builds understanding and a shared vision of desirable future landscapes Determines the factors that will shape the landscape in the future so that they can be mitigated or influenced Builds multidisciplinary teams to tackle these complex, intersectoral landscape-scale problems Explores possible future scenarios for the geographical areas in question and their peoples Provides a framework for negotiations between stakeholders who have different views of desirable landscape-scale outcomes Makes the knowledge, assumptions, and desires of different stakeholders more apparent and easily understood by other stakeholders Source: Authors’ compilation using Sayers 2006. ■ ■ Identifies key leverage points that can be used to get the ecosystem or landscape to change in desirable ways Establishes a flexible monitoring and evaluation system to monitor and measure impacts on the landscape to allow for changes to be made in implementation Several approaches exist for implementing strategies that integrate management of land, water, and living resources and promote conservation and sustainable use in an equitable manner (for example, an ecosystem approach). The elements listed above are generic to several of these approaches and provide practical operational entry points. poor. In addition, the productive use of forests can significantly contribute to economic development, while the management of biological and ecological services from forests can provide numerous local as well as global environmental benefits. As noted in the strategy, forests (and their users and beneficiaries) both have an impact on and are affected by policies and actions in other sectors, as well as by biophysical changes in adjoining or biologically linked areas (as examples, forest fires can result from land-use practices in agricultural lands, or macroeconomic reforms can affect the opportunity cost of land) (see chapter 6: Mainstreaming Forests into Development Policy and Planning). In this context, optimizing forest functions 3 in a landscape can unlock the full potential of forests. A landscape-focused program can facilitate the assessment of broader, wide-ranging trends, influences, and management impacts to more adequately assess economic and ecological sustainability and identify the appropriate management strategies to maintain these resources for the benefit of all. In certain World Bank client countries where land conversion is a major threat to forests, a landscape approach can minimize site-specific activities negatively affecting or conflicting with each other. It can also enhance any synergies that otherwise may be overlooked. Similarly, in client countries where landscapes are a mosaic of land uses, an approach that takes the landscape into account can assist in internalizing positive externalities and minimizing negative externalities from individual land uses. While the global rate of deforestation has fallen from 0.22 percent in the 1990s to 0.18 percent in the 2000s, the development and conservation communities continue to bemoan the imminent loss of forests, biodiversity, and associated economic and environmental services. However, not all deforestation is inevitable and not all deforestation is necessarily bad because many countries are replanting native and/or exotic forests on former forest lands and in natural grasslands. These new forests are having landscape-, regional-, and global-level impacts although they do not provide significant biodiversity conservation and are not a substitute for natural forests. The landscape approach can aid in better understanding the tradeoffs and potential synergies among competing land claims and uses in forest zones. Thus, a balance would be attempted among pressures to increase protected areas; expand the area of independently certified and sustainably managed natural forest; and convert forests to sustainable agroforestry-based farming systems, timber plantations, commercial-scale agribusiness estates (such as soybean farming or cattle ranching), or crop-based biofuels manufactured from sugar or oil palm. All of the multilateral environmental agreements now seek to achieve their objectives through the integrated management of natural resource systems at large spatial scales. 124 CHAPTER 4: OPTIMIZING FOREST FUNCTIONS IN A LANDSCAPE
People and human societies are seen as being part of these systems. The words “landscape” and “ecosystem” are widely used in these agreements and in the general environmental policy discourse to convey the concept of integrated management of resources and human activities at the landscape scale. The World Bank’s clients will or should be moving toward landscape and ecosystem approaches, and Bank lending should be designed in ways that encourage and nurture this process and facilitate the move in this direction. This chapter (and associated notes) presents some of the key issues underlying implementation of the landscape approach and tools to assist with its application. PAST ACTIVITIES The study by Sayer and Maginnis (2005) showed that much contemporary forest management already uses many elements of the landscape or ecosystem approaches even though it may not be using those terms. 4 The World Bank has been involved in a number of watershed management projects, as well as sector projects with watershed management components. Boerma (2000) provides a review of the Bank’s portfolio in this field between 1990 and 1999. According to a review of the World Bank’s activities based on project appraisal documents, 24 watershed management projects and 29 projects with watershed management components were reported on in the period 1990–2004. The project rationale and objectives for more than 80 percent of the watershed management projects were based on sustainable management of natural resources as a basis for agricultural production increase, which would lead to poverty reduction by increasing incomes. Simultaneously, institutional development and capacity building were addressed by more than 90 percent of the projects. In many projects, forest management was part of the spatial watershed management approach, with the twin objectives of maintaining or increasing forest cover and creating incentives for sustainable management by local people. 5 Investments were in both natural forest management and reforestation and afforestation. KEY ISSUES There is no single “landscape approach.” There are, however, a number of underlying concepts that deserve to be more widely known and a number of useful techniques for developing a shared understanding of landscape-scale functions, for exploring landscape-scale scenarios, and for measuring landscape-scale outcomes (see note 4.2, Assessing Outcomes of Landscape Interventions). Thus, within the same geographical area, the landscape approach would be applied differently for interventions concerned with the preservation of rare plants and animals, the management of hydrological functions, the optimization of infrastructure investments, or the maintenance of scenic beauty. Not only would the area of interest be different for these different interventions, the methods used to address landscape issues would also be different. Define the landscape. The essential first step for most natural resource managers is to define the landscape so that (i) landscape patterns and management responses can be assessed and management adjusted according to anticipated tradeoffs and synergies, (ii) relevant institutional players can be identified and involved, and (iii) the approach can be suitably adapted. Linked to defining the landscape is explicitly delineating the boundaries of the landscape before undertaking activities at the landscape level. Boundaries need to be established through a clear definition of the purpose of operating at the landscape level, and should be agreed on by all main actors. To implement the landscape approach, it is useful to also spatially demarcate micro areas, or specific areas within the larger landscape. These units should be tractable, improve the understanding of interactions among different land uses, and assist in optimizing forest functions in the landscape. The objectives for these macro and micro areas should be harmonized and nested to the extent possible. Move beyond spatial planning and establishing corridors. The rhetoric supporting large-scale approaches to forest conservation and management (including plantations) is ubiquitous in project and program descriptions. However, most systematic conservation planning approaches appear to be based mainly on spatial planning techniques. These approaches range from those that attempt to maximize the extent and connectivity of natural habitat and confine measures to improve local livelihoods to the residual land, to those that are highly technical and framed by mathematical optimization modeling that finds the landscape configuration that achieves specific environmental goals at minimum cost (see box 4.2). The premise underlying this chapter is that the planning associated with landscape approaches must incorporate the management of landscapes to provide flows of conservation and development benefits to stakeholders (see note 4.1, Integrated Forest Landscape Land-Use Planning). There can be a need to stimulate demand for such planning and to ensure that the planning process responds to community needs. CHAPTER 4: OPTIMIZING FOREST FUNCTIONS IN A LANDSCAPE 125
- Page 73 and 74: inputs (communities), and cost savi
- Page 75 and 76: community arrangements, such as eth
- Page 77 and 78: NOTE 2.2 Small and Medium Enterpris
- Page 79 and 80: must be distinguished from products
- Page 81 and 82: overregulation falls most heavily o
- Page 83 and 84: da Amazônia (IPAM) and the Interna
- Page 85 and 86: NOTE 2.3 Innovative Marketing Arran
- Page 87 and 88: Table 2.2 World Bank Projects with
- Page 89 and 90: payments for reforestation can enco
- Page 91: Wunder, S. 2005. “Payments for En
- Page 94 and 95: Box 3.1 Technical Definitions Wood
- Page 96 and 97: Table 3.2 Wood Fuel Data for Select
- Page 98 and 99: ered it important to have the World
- Page 100 and 101: operations (such as community-based
- Page 102 and 103: also needs to be extended in many c
- Page 104 and 105: NOTE 3.1 Mainstreaming Conservation
- Page 106 and 107: areas that can be used more intensi
- Page 108 and 109: Box 3.7 Applying HCVF in Papua New
- Page 110 and 111: Finally, any existing protections,
- Page 112 and 113: However, these general rules are se
- Page 114 and 115: the origin of products from a certi
- Page 116 and 117: management practices in selected en
- Page 118 and 119: Reforms) provide the framework for
- Page 120 and 121: lenges to weak institutions, which
- Page 123: CHAPTER 4 Optimizing Forest Functio
- Page 127 and 128: Encourage stakeholder participation
- Page 129 and 130: Box 4.5 Tradeoffs Framework Used in
- Page 131 and 132: Sector and Thematic Evaluation, Ope
- Page 133 and 134: Identify planning team members and
- Page 135 and 136: Involve relevant stakeholders in de
- Page 137 and 138: needs of implementing partners and
- Page 139 and 140: NOTE 4.2 Assessing Outcomes of Land
- Page 141 and 142: Box 4.13 Possible Indicators for As
- Page 143 and 144: NOTE 4.3 Using Adaptive Management
- Page 145 and 146: ■ ■ ■ ■ Develop a project p
- Page 147 and 148: Another important and useful proces
- Page 149 and 150: theless, it is never too late to st
- Page 151 and 152: CHAPTER 5 IMPROVING FOREST GOVERNAN
- Page 153 and 154: Improving forest governance and leg
- Page 155 and 156: tant part of the World Bank’s con
- Page 157 and 158: sector with broader governance and
- Page 159 and 160: NOTE 5.1 Decentralized Forest Manag
- Page 161 and 162: Assess the overall decentralization
- Page 163 and 164: Box 5.5 Nicaragua: Asymmetries Betw
- Page 165 and 166: Parker, A. 1995. “Decentralizatio
- Page 167 and 168: ■ ■ ■ Management of forests (
- Page 169 and 170: such as designing a transparent con
- Page 171 and 172: Box 5.11 Citizen Report Cards: Benc
- Page 173 and 174: NOTE 5.3 Strengthening Legal Framew
Box 4.1<br />
What Is a Landscape Approach?<br />
The landscape approach should incorporate the following<br />
elements:<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
Builds understanding and a shared vision of desirable<br />
future landscapes<br />
Determines the factors that will shape the landscape in<br />
the future so that they can be mitigated or influenced<br />
Builds multidisciplinary teams to tackle these complex,<br />
intersectoral landscape-scale problems<br />
Explores possible future scenarios for the geographical<br />
areas in question and their peoples<br />
Provides a framework for negotiations between<br />
stakeholders who have different views of desirable<br />
landscape-scale outcomes<br />
Makes the knowledge, assumptions, and desires of<br />
different stakeholders more apparent and easily<br />
understood by other stakeholders<br />
Source: Authors’ compilation using Sayers 2006.<br />
■<br />
■<br />
Identifies key leverage points that can be used to get<br />
the ecosystem or landscape to change in desirable<br />
ways<br />
Establishes a flexible monitoring and evaluation system<br />
to monitor and measure impacts on the landscape<br />
to allow for changes to be made in implementation<br />
Several approaches exist for implementing strategies<br />
that integrate management of land, water, and living<br />
resources and promote conservation and sustainable<br />
use in an equitable manner (for example, an<br />
ecosystem approach). The elements listed above are<br />
generic to several of these approaches and provide<br />
practical operational entry points.<br />
poor. In addition, the productive use of forests can significantly<br />
contribute to economic development, while the management<br />
of biological and ecological services from forests<br />
can provide numerous local as well as global environmental<br />
benefits. As noted in the strategy, forests (and their users<br />
and beneficiaries) both have an impact on and are affected<br />
by policies and actions in other sectors, as well as by biophysical<br />
changes in adjoining or biologically linked areas (as<br />
examples, forest fires can result from land-use practices in<br />
agricultural lands, or macroeconomic reforms can affect the<br />
opportunity cost of land) (see chapter 6: Mainstreaming<br />
<strong>Forests</strong> into Development Policy and Planning). In this context,<br />
optimizing forest functions 3 in a landscape can unlock<br />
the full potential of forests.<br />
A landscape-focused program can facilitate the assessment<br />
of broader, wide-ranging trends, influences, and management<br />
impacts to more adequately assess economic and<br />
ecological sustainability and identify the appropriate management<br />
strategies to maintain these resources for the benefit<br />
of all. In certain World Bank client countries where land<br />
conversion is a major threat to forests, a landscape approach<br />
can minimize site-specific activities negatively affecting or<br />
conflicting with each other. It can also enhance any synergies<br />
that otherwise may be overlooked. Similarly, in client<br />
countries where landscapes are a mosaic of land uses, an<br />
approach that takes the landscape into account can assist in<br />
internalizing positive externalities and minimizing negative<br />
externalities from individual land uses.<br />
While the global rate of deforestation has fallen from<br />
0.22 percent in the 1990s to 0.18 percent in the 2000s, the<br />
development and conservation communities continue to<br />
bemoan the imminent loss of forests, biodiversity, and associated<br />
economic and environmental services. However, not<br />
all deforestation is inevitable and not all deforestation is<br />
necessarily bad because many countries are replanting native<br />
and/or exotic forests on former forest lands and in natural<br />
grasslands. These new forests are having landscape-,<br />
regional-, and global-level impacts although they do not<br />
provide significant biodiversity conservation and are not a<br />
substitute for natural forests. The landscape approach can<br />
aid in better understanding the tradeoffs and potential synergies<br />
among competing land claims and uses in forest<br />
zones. Thus, a balance would be attempted among pressures<br />
to increase protected areas; expand the area of independently<br />
certified and sustainably managed natural forest; and<br />
convert forests to sustainable agroforestry-based farming<br />
systems, timber plantations, commercial-scale agribusiness<br />
estates (such as soybean farming or cattle ranching), or<br />
crop-based biofuels manufactured from sugar or oil palm.<br />
All of the multilateral environmental agreements now<br />
seek to achieve their objectives through the integrated management<br />
of natural resource systems at large spatial scales.<br />
124 CHAPTER 4: OPTIMIZING FOREST FUNCTIONS IN A LANDSCAPE