Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network
Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network Forests Sourcebook - HCV Resource Network
(v) coordinating across the Bank, including with International Finance Corporation (IFC), Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA), and World Bank Institute (WBI) for better implementation of a unified strategy. 3. This policy was approved by the World Bank’s Board of Executive Directors in 2003. 4. The World Bank Group includes the International Development Association (IDA), International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), IFC, and MIGA. Aggregate investment in the forest sector tends to fluctuate from year to year because it can be heavily skewed by one or two large projects. Such fluctuations would be less if aggregate disbursements were tracked. 5. This sourcebook does not go into details, but the Global Environment Facility (GEF) is an important partner in the implementation of the Forests Strategy. In 2003–05, the GEF provided US$186.1 million for 38 forest-related projects implemented by the World Bank. The total value of these projects was US$951.8 million. The number of World Bank–implemented GEF projects has averaged 13 per year since 2000. The average size of these projects has doubled during the same period, from US$16.1 million to US$34.4 million. 6. For more details, please see the regional strategy (World Bank 2007). 7. See Unlocking Opportunities for Forest-Dependent People (World Bank 2006). It includes a policy report, policy dialogue, and comprehensive dissemination that will guide future World Bank lending in forestry. It is the basis for discussions with the government of India on possible reforms at the national and state levels. Important outcomes have been the formation of a forestry donor’s forum, and highlevel policy meetings with the Prime Minister’s Office and the National Planning Commission. 8. These subjects have been the focus of Bank projects in Bolivia, Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Paraguay, and Peru. REFERENCES CITED Contreras-Hermosilla, A., and M. Simula. 2007. “The World Bank Forest Strategy: Review of Implementation.” World Bank, Washington, DC. FAO. 2006. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005. Rome: FAO. Stern, N. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. White, A., and A. Martin. 2002. Who Owns the World’s Forests? Forest Tenure and Public Forests in Transition. Washington, DC: Forest Trends. World Bank. 2004. Sustaining Forests: A Development Strategy. Washington, DC: World Bank. ———. 2006. Unlocking Opportunities for Forest-Dependent People—India. Delhi, India: Oxford University Press. ———. 2007. East Asia Region Forestry Strategy. EASRD (Rural Development and Natural Resources. East Asia & Pacific Region), World Bank, Washington, DC. 12 INTRODUCTION: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN THE FOREST SECTOR
PART I Priority Themes and Operational Aspects
- Page 1 and 2: INTRODUCTION OPPORTUNITIES AND CHAL
- Page 3 and 4: Forest law enforcement and governan
- Page 5 and 6: ■ Protecting vital local and glob
- Page 7 and 8: Figure 3 Commitment from the World
- Page 9 and 10: Figure 6 Regional Distribution of I
- Page 11: management and biodiversity conserv
- Page 16 and 17: Angelsen and Wunder 2003; and Malli
- Page 18 and 19: harvesting forest products that are
- Page 20 and 21: forest management and ownership hav
- Page 22 and 23: Institutional development of capaci
- Page 24 and 25: Contreras-Hermosilla, A., and M. Si
- Page 26 and 27: Box 1.4 Poverty-Forest Linkages Too
- Page 28 and 29: Box 1.6 An Overview of the Tools fo
- Page 30 and 31: NOTE 1.2 Community-Based Forest Man
- Page 32 and 33: the biophysical resource through fo
- Page 34 and 35: Box 1.12 Andhra Pradesh Community F
- Page 36 and 37: Box 1.14 Community Forestry in Mexi
- Page 38 and 39: World Bank, 1978. Forestry. Sector
- Page 40 and 41: [Indigenous Peoples’] rights of o
- Page 42 and 43: inappropriate. Thus, development pr
- Page 44 and 45: nity territory into individual plot
- Page 46 and 47: LESSONS LEARNED AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- Page 48 and 49: Borrini-Feyerabend, G., M. Pimbert,
- Page 50 and 51: In what are considered public fores
- Page 52 and 53: Figure 1.1 Toward Tenure Security:A
- Page 54 and 55: Box 1.21 Opportunities to Advance C
- Page 56 and 57: NOTE 1.5 Making Markets Work for th
- Page 58 and 59: ■ environmental groups to produce
- Page 60 and 61: Box 1.25 Medicinal Plants as NTFPs
(v) coordinating across the Bank, including with International<br />
Finance Corporation (IFC), Multilateral Investment<br />
Guarantee Agency (MIGA), and World Bank Institute<br />
(WBI) for better implementation of a unified strategy.<br />
3. This policy was approved by the World Bank’s Board of<br />
Executive Directors in 2003.<br />
4. The World Bank Group includes the International<br />
Development Association (IDA), International Bank for<br />
Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), International<br />
Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), IFC,<br />
and MIGA. Aggregate investment in the forest sector tends<br />
to fluctuate from year to year because it can be heavily<br />
skewed by one or two large projects. Such fluctuations<br />
would be less if aggregate disbursements were tracked.<br />
5. This sourcebook does not go into details, but the Global<br />
Environment Facility (GEF) is an important partner in the<br />
implementation of the <strong>Forests</strong> Strategy. In 2003–05, the<br />
GEF provided US$186.1 million for 38 forest-related projects<br />
implemented by the World Bank. The total value of<br />
these projects was US$951.8 million. The number of World<br />
Bank–implemented GEF projects has averaged 13 per year<br />
since 2000. The average size of these projects has doubled<br />
during the same period, from US$16.1 million to US$34.4<br />
million.<br />
6. For more details, please see the regional strategy (World<br />
Bank 2007).<br />
7. See Unlocking Opportunities for Forest-Dependent People<br />
(World Bank 2006). It includes a policy report, policy dialogue,<br />
and comprehensive dissemination that will guide<br />
future World Bank lending in forestry. It is the basis for discussions<br />
with the government of India on possible reforms<br />
at the national and state levels. Important outcomes have<br />
been the formation of a forestry donor’s forum, and highlevel<br />
policy meetings with the Prime Minister’s Office and<br />
the National Planning Commission.<br />
8. These subjects have been the focus of Bank projects in<br />
Bolivia, Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico,<br />
Nicaragua, Paraguay, and Peru.<br />
REFERENCES CITED<br />
Contreras-Hermosilla, A., and M. Simula. 2007. “The World<br />
Bank Forest Strategy: Review of Implementation.” World<br />
Bank, Washington, DC.<br />
FAO. 2006. Global Forest <strong>Resource</strong>s Assessment 2005. Rome:<br />
FAO.<br />
Stern, N. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern<br />
Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />
White, A., and A. Martin. 2002. Who Owns the World’s<br />
<strong>Forests</strong>? Forest Tenure and Public <strong>Forests</strong> in Transition.<br />
Washington, DC: Forest Trends.<br />
World Bank. 2004. Sustaining <strong>Forests</strong>: A Development Strategy.<br />
Washington, DC: World Bank.<br />
———. 2006. Unlocking Opportunities for Forest-Dependent<br />
People—India. Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.<br />
———. 2007. East Asia Region Forestry Strategy. EASRD<br />
(Rural Development and Natural <strong>Resource</strong>s. East Asia &<br />
Pacific Region), World Bank, Washington, DC.<br />
12 INTRODUCTION: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN THE FOREST SECTOR