Successmaker Enterprise Software Purchase - Harford County ...
Successmaker Enterprise Software Purchase - Harford County ... Successmaker Enterprise Software Purchase - Harford County ...
Harford County Public Schools – State Discretionary Grant – HSA FY10 Teacher Outcomes Outcome 1 Demonstrate an increased understanding of co-teaching as means of support to SWD in heterogeneous learning environments utilizing collaboration and cooperation among general education and special education teachers. Indicator /Data Source Quarterly Monitoring of Student Progress and Instructional Supports Fidelity Checks Observation Feedback Date Observable November 2009 February, April and June 2010 1 st and 2 nd semester fidelity checks Data Collector Grant Manager CTE /JHU Date Data Collected Student Outcomes Outcome 1 Students will display an increased ability to demonstrate the processes of mathematics by making connections and applying reasoning to solve and communicate their findings. Indicator /Data Source Apply a variety of concepts processes and skills to solve problems Justify ideas or solutions with mathematical concepts or proofs Students will mathematical ideas using words, symbols, visual displays, or technology HCPS Unit Assessments Achievement on MSA Date Observable September 1, 2009 Data Collector School Data Teams Date Data Collected Section 4: Professional Learning Activities and Follow-Up Activities Description Presentation by Marilyn Friend to teachers, administrators from the grant schools re: Effective Co- Teaching Teams: planning and implementing effective instruction and problem-solving strategies – emphasis on co-teaching in the math content Presentation by Marilyn Friend to HCPS administrators re: Administrative Issues Related to Structuring and Supporting Effective Co-Teaching Environments: scheduling for co-teaching, planning and implementing effective instruction, student groupings, and problem-solving strategies – Panel discussion ―What works in Co-Teaching?‖ Grant school administrators Large Group □ Action Research Section 5: Evaluation Plan Discussion/ study groups Review of student work & planning instructional improvement □ Demonstrations □ Preparation of new instructional materials Professional Development Plan page 19 Single Date December 9,2009 Observation of participants Other: Guest Speaker Date(s) February 25 and 26,2010 Feedback on mastery Ongoing Start/Stop Date ―How has student achievement been influenced by the implemented activities Evidence collected will include longitudinal student achievement data (self-comparison); achievement data from the current year for students with disabilities in the same school (within school patterns) and achievement data for students with disabilities from
Harford County Public Schools – State Discretionary Grant – HSA FY10 participating schools (cross- school comparison). Section 5: Budget Budget Category, Direct Costs I. Personnel $7,000.00 A. Staff (e.g., PD coordinator, principal, curriculum resource teacher) B. Consultants (e.g., presenters, facilitators, evaluator) $7,000.00 Speaker: Marilyn Friend – Co-Teaching Seminar for AYP Grant Co-Teaching Teams (December 2009) Generating Systemic Change – Co-Teaching for School Administrators (February 2010) II. Stipends/substitutes (for participants) $13,992.00 Provide substitutes to instructional staff participating in Marilyn Friend Presentations $91.50/day x 48 substitutes x 1 day = $4,692.00 Fixed costs $4,692.00 x .07998 = $878.00 Provide stipends for planning for Math Co-teaching Teams $20/hour x 1 hours/month x 10 months x 48 teachers = $9,600.00 Fixed costs $9,600.00 x .07998 = $768.00 III. Travel $1,090.00 A. Personnel Travel B. Consultant Travel Roundtrip airfare $300.00 Overnight accommodations $440.00 Meals: $150.00 Taxi/Rental: $200.00 IV. Facilities, Equipment, Materials $3,025.00 110 copies of Co-Teach by Marilyn Friend x $25.00 ($2,750.00) + 10% S/H ($275.00) V. Communications VI. Other Costs Fixed costs $1,120.00 Total Costs $26,227.00 Professional Development Plan page 20
- Page 1 and 2: BOARD OF EDUCATION OF HARFORD COUNT
- Page 3 and 4: HCPS SCHOOLS NOT MEETING AYP FOR ST
- Page 5 and 6: The criteria used to determine stud
- Page 7 and 8: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 9 and 10: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 11 and 12: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 13 and 14: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 15 and 16: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 17 and 18: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 19 and 20: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 21 and 22: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 23 and 24: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 25 and 26: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 27: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 31 and 32: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 33 and 34: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 35 and 36: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 37 and 38: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 39 and 40: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 41 and 42: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 43 and 44: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 45 and 46: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 47 and 48: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 49 and 50: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 51 and 52: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 53 and 54: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 55 and 56: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 57 and 58: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 59 and 60: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 61 and 62: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 63 and 64: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 65 and 66: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 67 and 68: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 69 and 70: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 71 and 72: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 73 and 74: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 75 and 76: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
- Page 77 and 78: Harford County Public Schools - Sta
<strong>Harford</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public Schools – State Discretionary Grant – HSA FY10<br />
Teacher<br />
Outcomes<br />
Outcome<br />
1 Demonstrate an increased<br />
understanding of co-teaching<br />
as means of support to SWD<br />
in heterogeneous learning<br />
environments utilizing<br />
collaboration and cooperation<br />
among general education and<br />
special education teachers.<br />
Indicator /Data<br />
Source<br />
Quarterly Monitoring of<br />
Student Progress and<br />
Instructional Supports<br />
Fidelity Checks<br />
Observation Feedback<br />
Date<br />
Observable<br />
November 2009<br />
February, April<br />
and June 2010<br />
1 st and 2 nd<br />
semester fidelity<br />
checks<br />
Data<br />
Collector<br />
Grant Manager<br />
CTE /JHU<br />
Date Data<br />
Collected<br />
Student<br />
Outcomes<br />
Outcome<br />
1 Students will display an<br />
increased ability to<br />
demonstrate the processes of<br />
mathematics by making<br />
connections and applying<br />
reasoning to solve and<br />
communicate their findings.<br />
Indicator /Data<br />
Source<br />
Apply a variety of<br />
concepts processes and<br />
skills to solve problems<br />
Justify ideas or solutions<br />
with mathematical<br />
concepts or proofs<br />
Students will mathematical<br />
ideas using words,<br />
symbols, visual displays,<br />
or technology<br />
HCPS Unit Assessments<br />
Achievement on MSA<br />
Date<br />
Observable<br />
September 1,<br />
2009<br />
Data<br />
Collector<br />
School Data<br />
Teams<br />
Date Data<br />
Collected<br />
Section 4: Professional Learning Activities and Follow-Up<br />
Activities<br />
Description<br />
Presentation by Marilyn Friend to teachers, administrators from the grant schools re: Effective Co-<br />
Teaching Teams: planning and implementing effective instruction and problem-solving strategies<br />
– emphasis on co-teaching in the math content<br />
Presentation by Marilyn Friend to HCPS administrators re: Administrative Issues Related to<br />
Structuring and Supporting Effective Co-Teaching Environments: scheduling for co-teaching,<br />
planning and implementing effective instruction, student groupings, and problem-solving strategies<br />
– Panel discussion ―What works in Co-Teaching?‖ Grant school administrators<br />
Large Group<br />
□ Action Research<br />
Section 5: Evaluation Plan<br />
Discussion/ study<br />
groups<br />
Review of student<br />
work & planning<br />
instructional<br />
improvement<br />
□ Demonstrations<br />
□ Preparation of new<br />
instructional<br />
materials<br />
Professional Development Plan page 19<br />
Single Date<br />
December 9,2009<br />
Observation of<br />
participants<br />
Other: Guest<br />
Speaker<br />
Date(s)<br />
February 25 and 26,2010<br />
Feedback on<br />
mastery<br />
Ongoing<br />
Start/Stop Date<br />
―How has student achievement been influenced by the implemented activities Evidence collected will include<br />
longitudinal student achievement data (self-comparison); achievement data from the current year for students with<br />
disabilities in the same school (within school patterns) and achievement data for students with disabilities from