08.01.2014 Views

EDUC 8678 - Pre-reading - Curriculum and its discontents

EDUC 8678 - Pre-reading - Curriculum and its discontents

EDUC 8678 - Pre-reading - Curriculum and its discontents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

172<br />

MAXINE GREENE/CI<br />

DWAYNE. "The morbid curriculum field: Its wake <strong>and</strong> our work."<br />

HUEBNER,<br />

<strong>Curriculum</strong> Inquiry 6, no. 2 (1976): 153-176.<br />

MCNEIL, JOHN D. <strong>Curriculum</strong>: A comprehensive introduction. Toronto: Little,<br />

Brown, 1977.<br />

PINAR, WILLIAM F. <strong>Curriculum</strong> theorizing. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan, 1975.<br />

. "Notes on the curriculum field 1978." Educational Researcher 7, no. 8<br />

(1978): 5-12. (a)<br />

."The reconceptualization<br />

of curriculum studies." <strong>Curriculum</strong> Studies 10,<br />

no. 3 (1978): 205-214. (b)<br />

SCHWAB, JOSEPH J. "The Practical: A language for curriculum." In Science,<br />

curriculum, <strong>and</strong> liberal education, edited by Ian Westbury <strong>and</strong> Neil J. Wilkof.<br />

Chicago: University of Chicago <strong>Pre</strong>ss, 1978.<br />

YOUNG, MICHAEL<br />

F. D. Knowledge <strong>and</strong> control. London: Collier-Macmillan, 1971.<br />

Response to Philip Jackson<br />

Maxine Greene, Teachers College, Columbia<br />

University<br />

When Susan Sontag treated "illness as metaphor," she did so to clarify the<br />

perspectives through which we see tuberculosis <strong>and</strong> cancer. Not only have<br />

the traditional metaphors falsified the actualities of those diseases, she<br />

said, but in some fundamental way they are unjust. Philip Jackson<br />

examines death as metaphor for talking about curriculum; he also<br />

questions the notion of "field." His intention, too, appears to be to clarify;<br />

he wants to show the impact of reification, to break through various kinds<br />

of mystification, to recover a way of speaking that might make a difference<br />

in the schools. Displaying (with some delectation) the fictions created by<br />

the participants in the curricular debate, he does not penetrate the heart of<br />

the matter, or so it seems to me. Unlike Susan Sontag, he does not have a<br />

clear sense of the actuality the metaphors obscure, nor does he communicate<br />

a sense of his own evident commitment to effecting needed change. Instead,<br />

he implies that we are all actors in some strange fictional domain.<br />

Something similar happens with respect to "Discontents." A reader is<br />

led to associate with Sigmund Freud's Civilization <strong>and</strong> Its Discontents <strong>and</strong><br />

Freud's stress on the fragility of culture in the face of our "instinctual<br />

urgencies." That book ended with an attribution of the dejection of the<br />

modern age to the recognition that human beings had so perfected their<br />

techniques of mastery <strong>and</strong> control that they were in a position to<br />

"exterminate one another to the last man." But Jackson suggests that the<br />

"spirit of discontent" he finds in educational discussion has been<br />

concocted deliberately (in East Anglia, or in London, or in Hershey,<br />

? 1980 by The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.<br />

CURRICULUM INQUIRY 10:2 (1980) 0362-6784/80/0010-0172$1.00

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!