08.01.2014 Views

Scientific Management and Weber's Bureaucracy

Scientific Management and Weber's Bureaucracy

Scientific Management and Weber's Bureaucracy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Educational Leadership<br />

Leading the Organization:<br />

<strong>Scientific</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Weber’s <strong>Bureaucracy</strong><br />

Elaine Sharplin


Choose the word or words that best describe some aspect of<br />

your organisation :<br />

•An organism, a machine, a layered cake, a social club<br />

•Decisions are made by:<br />

consensus, democratic system, executive positions<br />

or in accordance with rules <strong>and</strong> regulations<br />

•Workers are motivated by:<br />

money, peer influence, negative consequences,<br />

intrinsic motivation<br />

•Students are seen as:<br />

raw materials, inputs/outputs, individuals with<br />

personal needs, members of a class/year/peer group


EFFECTIVENESS<br />

• An action is effective if it<br />

accomplishes its specific aim.<br />

• To be effective an institution or<br />

individual must accomplish<br />

something.<br />

• The term implies deliberate action<br />

aimed at achieving a specific target.


EFFICIENCY<br />

• Efficiency involves accomplishment, but<br />

implies without waste of effort or<br />

resources.<br />

• It has value-for-money connotations.<br />

• The degree of efficiency is the extent to<br />

which resources are consumed in<br />

achieving the goal.


Take the following statements <strong>and</strong><br />

develop several scenarios which<br />

illustrate these points.<br />

a) A school can be effective but<br />

inefficient<br />

b) A school can be efficient but not<br />

effective<br />

c) A school can be effective <strong>and</strong> efficient<br />

but not necessarily excellent (in the sense<br />

of being best amongst its peers).


SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT<br />

Taylor developed four principles:<br />

1. <strong>Management</strong> must analyze work practices using time <strong>and</strong> motion<br />

studies<br />

2. Workers should be carefully selected, trained <strong>and</strong> paid to do a<br />

good job<br />

3. Workers <strong>and</strong> managers must cooperate for the new management<br />

principles to succeed<br />

4. Planning must be separated from the completion of the task.<br />

Planning includes the creation of a suitable work environment


Henri Fayol (1841-1925)<br />

Managerial activity consists of five<br />

elements:<br />

– planning,<br />

– organizing,<br />

– comm<strong>and</strong>ing,<br />

– coordinating,<br />

– controlling.


Managers needed to<br />

possess certain qualities<br />

1. Physical qualities - vigour, good health<br />

2. Mental qualities - underst<strong>and</strong>ing, judgement,<br />

adaptability<br />

3. Moral qualities - loyalty, firmness, initiative,<br />

responsibility<br />

4. General education<br />

5. Specialized knowledge - relevant to the field of<br />

business or industry<br />

6. Experience - in the field.


Lyndall Urwick (1891-1984)<br />

Principles for the guidance of<br />

managers<br />

1. Objectives - all organizations should have a clearly specified<br />

purpose;<br />

2. Correspondence - authority must be equalled by responsibility;<br />

3. Ultimate authority - higher authorities have absolute responsibility<br />

for the work of subordinates;<br />

4. Scalar principle - a line of authority exists from the ultimate<br />

authority to the lowest position in the organization;


5. Span of control - supervision should be limited to<br />

the direct control of no more than five or six<br />

subordinates<br />

6. Specialization - an employee's work should be<br />

limited to one function<br />

7. Coordination - all activities must be coordinated<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

8. Definition - each duty must be clearly described<br />

(Wren, 1987).


LEGACY OF SCIENTIFIC<br />

MANAGEMENT THEORY<br />

Efficiency as the measure of managerial<br />

success (The notion of economic<br />

rationalism continues to be highly<br />

influential.)<br />

• Increased productivity through planning<br />

of tasks,<br />

• The division of labour <strong>and</strong> specialization<br />

• Selection of staff <strong>and</strong> training for<br />

efficiency.


• The use of time <strong>and</strong> motion studies.<br />

• Use of monetary incentives<br />

• The st<strong>and</strong>ardization of tasks<br />

• The principle of unity of comm<strong>and</strong> - that<br />

orders should be received from only one<br />

super-ordinate<br />

• Focus on formal organizational structures.


CRITICISMS OF SCIENTIFIC<br />

MANAGEMENT THEORY<br />

• 1. Man is viewed narrowly as motivated<br />

only by economic considerations<br />

• 2. The models developed are too<br />

simplistic<br />

• 3. The worker is viewed in isolation – as a<br />

machine, not as a social being<br />

• 4. The physiological emphasis is<br />

inadequate without use of sociological<br />

<strong>and</strong> psychological theories.


Weber‘s three types of authority<br />

1. Traditional - precedent, usage, custom<br />

2. Charismatic - rooted in individual<br />

personality<br />

3. Rational-legal - means to achieve<br />

goals, authority rests on rules,<br />

procedures.


<strong>Bureaucracy</strong><br />

• "... a clearly defined hierarchy where<br />

office holders have very specific<br />

functions <strong>and</strong> apply universalistic rules<br />

in a spirit of formalistic impersonality"<br />

(Silverman,1970, p.11).


Weber’s characteristics of an<br />

ideal bureaucracy<br />

1. Specialization of task<br />

2. Rational, hierarchical, authority<br />

structure<br />

3. Formal system of rules/regulations<br />

4. Impersonal/impartial allocation of work<br />

5. Stable career structure based on<br />

promotion according to competence<br />

6. Clear lines of communication.


CRITICISMS OF WEBER'S THEORY OF<br />

BUREAUCRACY<br />

• encourages overconformity<br />

• modifies the personality of bureaucrats<br />

• encourages communications overload<br />

• produces goal displacement<br />

• prohibits adaptation to change<br />

• raises the problem of the needs of the<br />

organization versus the needs of people.


• Are you a scientific manager or a<br />

bureaucrat?<br />

• Is your organisation influenced by<br />

scientific management or bureaucratic<br />

ways of operating?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!