07.01.2014 Views

LIFE01200604005 Shri Somnath Ghosh - Homi Bhabha National ...

LIFE01200604005 Shri Somnath Ghosh - Homi Bhabha National ...

LIFE01200604005 Shri Somnath Ghosh - Homi Bhabha National ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 1<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

becomes potentially cytotoxic. Therefore the onus lies on non gap junction mediated cell<br />

communication.<br />

Evidence for some forms of bystander effect has been suggested also by conventional<br />

irradiation with low doses. One of the first studies in this field has showed a significant,<br />

unexpected increase in the frequency of sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) after<br />

exposure of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells to very low doses of alpha particles,<br />

from 0.03 to 0.25 cGy [220]. While about 1% or less of the cells were actually traversed<br />

by a particle track, 30–45% of the individual cells showed increased levels of SCE. This<br />

suggests that genetic damage following exposure to very low doses of light ions may<br />

occur also in non directly-irradiated bystander cells.<br />

The studies discussed above strongly suggest a role of extranuclear- and possibly<br />

extracellular-targets in the propagation of certain damage types after irradiation with very<br />

low doses of light ions or treatment with ICM. Experiments allowing the identification of<br />

specific targets for such phenomena can be of great help to better understand the<br />

underlying mechanisms and to quantify the relative contributions of different targets.<br />

This kind of studies is now possible due to the increasing number of microbeam facilities.<br />

Such facilities in which cells are individually irradiated by a predefined exact number of<br />

particles allow the effects of individual particle traversals to be assessed, and these<br />

methods have become a useful tool in the study of bystander responses [221, 222]. Such<br />

studies suggest a major role of cell-to-cell communication via gap-junctions [223].<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!