07.01.2014 Views

LIFE01200604005 Shri Somnath Ghosh - Homi Bhabha National ...

LIFE01200604005 Shri Somnath Ghosh - Homi Bhabha National ...

LIFE01200604005 Shri Somnath Ghosh - Homi Bhabha National ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bystander effect: role of iNOS d S. GHOSH et al. 1571<br />

Fig. 5. Apoptosis assay of control, irradiated, and bystander EL-4 cells by Annexin-PI staining. EL-4 cells cultured for 18 h<br />

in the presence of different conditioned media. The EL-4 cells were stained using an annexin V/PI-staining kit. Characterization<br />

and quantification of apoptosis was done by confocal microscopy. Key: (A) Annexin-V; (B) PI; (C) DAPI; (D)<br />

Merge image of annexin-v, PI, and DAPI. Data represent means SE of three independent experiments; significantly<br />

different from unirradiated controls: **p < 0.01.<br />

There are numerous reports on the activation of signaling<br />

factors in the bystanding cells (1,2). However, not much is<br />

known about the genes that are activated in the bystanding<br />

cells in response to these signals. In our earlier work, we<br />

had shown that NF-kB and p21 levels were elevated in<br />

K562 cells (16). The present study was carried out to investigate<br />

which genes are activated in the bystanding cell and<br />

whether the state of activation of the irradiated cell alters<br />

the bystander response. The study was restricted only to the<br />

genes because, from our experience, even the change of irradiated<br />

medium leads to an activation of NF-kB (16). Additionally,<br />

minor stresses are known to alter the state of<br />

phosphorylation of signaling proteins. Our present results revealed<br />

a significant increase in DNA damage in the bystander<br />

cells, but only in those cells that had received medium from<br />

irradiated cells (Fig. 3). Because the cells treated only with<br />

irradiated medium did not show any DNA damage or NO<br />

production (results not shown), the signals that caused the<br />

damage in the bystander cells must be coming from the irradiated<br />

cells themselves. The expression of cell cycle–related<br />

genes (p53 and p21) was significantly upregulated in bystander<br />

similar cells (Fig. 1C, D, Lane 3). Our results are in<br />

agreement with the work on bystander signaling (1,2). The<br />

first report describing the induction of sister chromatid exchanges<br />

was examined in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Because<br />

Chinese hamster ovary cells contain mutant p53, p53<br />

could not be involved in the bystander induction of sister<br />

chromatid exchanges (17). If the p53 of the bystander cell<br />

is mutated, there should be less DNA repair and in fact<br />

more bystander effect can be seen when assessed in terms<br />

of DNA damage.<br />

A clear cause and effect relationship was established between<br />

DNA damage, gene expression, and cell survival and<br />

was evident in the form of increase apoptosis in bystander<br />

cells (Fig. 4, Lane 3, Fig. 5).<br />

An increased expression of NF-kB gene (p65) could lead<br />

to the activation of iNOS gene because the promoter of the<br />

iNOS gene contains binding sites for NF-kB. NF-kB is<br />

known to be activated by several oxidative stresses including<br />

ionization radiation (18–23). As a consequence of iNOS gene

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!