LIFE01200604005 Shri Somnath Ghosh - Homi Bhabha National ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

198 S. Ghosh et al. / Mutation Research 723 (2011) 190–198 ture for activation of apoptotic responses. Further studies in this direction will reveal the importance of such response. The use of oxygen beam therapy has definite advantage over gamma therapy and the understanding of the mechanism of apoptosis will give the clinician a handle to manipulate therapy for enhanced cell killing. Conflict of interest The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest. Acknowledgements This work was funded by Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences, Department of Atomic Energy [DAE], Government of India, through a project sanctioned to one of the authors, AS, bearing sanction number 2007/37/37/BRNS. All the authors are thankful to the Director, IUAC, New Delhi for providing radiation facility for the work. We would also like to extend our thanks to all the members of Pelletron group of IUAC for their sincere help during irradiation. Authors would like to thank Mr. Manjoor Ali and Mr. Paresh Khadilkar, RB&HSD, BARC for their help in Confocal Microscopy and Lab work, respectively. References [1] T. Miyamoto, N. Yamamoto, H. Nishimura, M. Koto, H. Tsujii, J.E. Mizoe, T. Kamada, H. Kato, S. Yamada, S. Morita, K. Yoshikawa, S. Kandatsu, T. Fujisawa, Carbon ion radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer, Radiother. Oncol. 66 (2003) 127–140. [2] T. Ogata, T. Teshima, K. Kagawa, Y. Hishikawa, Y. Takahashi, A. Kawaguchi, Y. Suzumoto, K. Nojima, Y. Furusawa, N. Matsuura, Particle irradiation suppresses metastatic potential of cancer cells, Cancer Res. 65 (2005) 113–120. [3] D. Schulz-Ertner, A. Nikoghosyan, C. Thilmann, T. Haberer, O. Jakel, C. Karger, G. Kraft, M. Wannenmacher, J. Debus, Results of carbon ion radiotherapy in 152 patients, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 58 (2004) 631–640. [4] H. Tsuji, H. Ishikawa, T. Yanagi, N. Hirasawa, T. Kamada, J.E. Mizoe, T. Kanai, H. Tsujii, Y. Ohnishi, Carbon-ion radiotherapy for locally advanced or unfavorably located choroidal melanoma: a phase I/II dose-escalation study, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 67 (2007) 857–862. [5] M. Durante, F.A. Cucinotta, Heavy ion carcinogenesis and human space exploration, Nat. Rev. Cancer 8 (2008) 465–472. [6] K. Shibuya, C.D. Mathers, C. Boschi-Pinto, A.D. Lopez, C.J. Murray, Global and regional estimates of cancer mortality and incidence by site. II. Results for the global burden of disease 2000, BMC Cancer 2 (2002) 37. [7] A. Jemal, R. Siegel, E. Ward, Y. Hao, J. Xu, T. Murray, M.J. Thun, Cancer statistics2008, CA Cancer J. Clin. 58 (2008) 71–96. [8] J. Ferlay, P. Autier, M. Boniol, M. Heanue, M. Colombet, P. Boyle, Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006, Ann. Oncol. 18 (2007) 581–592. [9] J. Jassem, The role of radiotherapy in lung cancer: where is the evidence? Radiother. Oncol. 83 (2007) 203–213. [10] Y.S. Kim, S.M. Yoon, E.K. Choi, B.Y. Yi, J.H. Kim, S.D. Ahn, S.W. Lee, S.S. Shin, J.S. Lee, C. Suh, S.W. Kim, D.S. Kim, W.S. Kim, H.J. Park, C.I. Park, Phase II study of radiotherapy with three-dimensional conformal boost concurrent with paclitaxel and cisplatin for Stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 62 (2005) 76–81. [11] D. Farray, N. Mirkovic, K.S. Albain, Multimodality therapy for stage III nonsmall-cell lung cancer, J. Clin. Oncol. 23 (2005) 3257–3269. [12] M. Koto, T. Miyamoto, N. Yamamoto, H. Nishimura, S. Yamada, H. Tsujii, Local control and recurrence of stage I non-small cell lung cancer after carbon ion radiotherapy, Radiother. Oncol. 71 (2004) 147–156. [13] T.K. Pandita, H.B. Lieberman, D.S. Lim, S. Dhar, W. Zheng, Y. Taya, M.B. Kastan, Ionizing radiation activates the ATM kinase throughout the cell cycle, Oncogene 19 (2000) 1386–1391. [14] M.B. Kastan, D.S. Lim, The many substrates and functions of ATM, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1 (2000) 179–186. [15] R.S. Maser, K.J. Monsen, B.E. Nelms, J.H. Petrini, hMre11 and hRad50 nuclear foci are induced during the normal cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks, Mol. Cell. Biol. 17 (1997) 6087–6096. [16] O. Fernandez-Capetillo, A. Lee, M. Nussenzweig, A. Nussenzweig, H2AX: the histone guardian of the genome, DNA Repair (Amst.) 3 (2004) 959–967. [17] S. Bekker-Jensen, C. Lukas, R. Kitagawa, F. Melander, M.B. Kastan, J. Bartek, J. Lukas, Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance machinery in response to DNA strand breaks, J. Cell. Biol. 173 (2006) 195–206. [18] J.F. Ziegler, The Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter, http://www.srim.org/. [19] J.F. Ziegler, J.P. Bierserk, U. Littmark, Stopping and Ranges of Ions in Matter, Pergamon Press, New York, 1985. [20] G. Kraft, Tumor therapy with heavy charged particles, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 45 (2000) S473–S544. [21] S. Ghosh, N.N. Bhat, S. Santra, R.G. Thomas, S.K. Gupta, R.K. Choudhury, M. Krishna, Low energy proton beam induces efficient cell killing in A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells, Cancer Invest. 28 (2010) 615–622. [22] W.S. Rasband, J.U.S. Image, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA, 1997–2006, http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/. [23] E.P. Rogakou, D.R. Pilch, A.H. Orr, V.S. Ivanova, W.M. Bonner, DNA doublestranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139, J. Biol. Chem. 273 (1998) 5858–5868. [24] P.L. Olive, J.P. Banath, Phosphorylation of histone H2AX as a measure of radiosensitivity, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 58 (2004) 331–335. [25] A. Asaithamby, N. Uematsu, A. Chatterjee, M.D. Story, S. Burma, D.J. Chen, Repair of HZE-particle-induced DNA double-strand breaks in normal human fibroblasts, Radiat. Res. 169 (2008) 437–446. [26] D. Avondoglio, T. Scott, W.J. Kil, M. Sproull, P.J. Tofilon, K. Camphausen, High throughput evaluation of gamma-H2AX, Radiat. Oncol. 4 (2009) 31. [27] T.T. Paull, E.P. Rogakou, V. Yamazaki, C.U. Kirchgessner, M. Gellert, W.M. Bonner, A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage, Curr. Biol. 10 (2000) 886–895. [28] H. Wang, Z.C. Zeng, T.A. Bui, S.J. DiBiase, W. Qin, F. Xia, S.N. Powell, G. Iliakis, Nonhomologous end-joining of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-stranded breaks in human tumor cells deficient in BRCA1 or BRCA2, Cancer Res. 61 (2001) 270–277. [29] E.U. Kurz, S.P. Lees-Miller, DNA damage-induced activation of ATM and ATMdependent signaling pathways, DNA Repair (Amst.) 3 (2004) 889–900. [30] N.D. Lakin, S.P. Jackson, Regulation of p53 in response to DNA damage, Oncogene 18 (1999) 7644–7655. [31] T. Rich, R.L. Allen, A.H. Wyllie, Defying death after DNA damage, Nature 407 (2000) 777–783. [32] J. Zhang, H. Willers, Z. Feng, J.C. Ghosh, S. Kim, D.T. Weaver, J.H. Chung, S.N. Powell, F. Xia, Chk2 phosphorylation of BRCA1 regulates DNA double-strand break repair, Mol. Cell. Biol. 24 (2004) 708–718. [33] S.E. Golding, E. Rosenberg, A. Khalil, A. McEwen, M. Holmes, S. Neill, L.F. Povirk, K. Valerie, Double strand break repair by homologous recombination is regulated by cell cycle-independent signaling via ATM in human glioma cells, J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 15402–15410. [34] F. Zafar, S.B. Seidler, A. Kronenberg, D. Schild, C. Wiese, Homologous recombination contributes to the repair of DNA double-strand breaks induced by high-energy iron ions, Radiat. Res. 173 (2010) 27–39. [35] P. Fei, E.J. Bernhard, W.S. El-Deiry, Tissue-specific induction of p53 targets in vivo, Cancer Res. 62 (2002) 7316–7327. [36] E. Yonish-Rouach, D. Resnitzky, J. Lotem, L. Sachs, A. Kimchi, M. Oren, Wildtype p53 induces apoptosis of myeloid leukaemic cells that is inhibited by interleukin-6, Nature 352 (1991) 345–347.
Cancer Investigation, 28:615–622, 2010 ISSN: 0735-7907 print / 1532-4192 online Copyright c○ Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. DOI: 10.3109/07357901003630991 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Cellular and Molecular Biology Low Energy Proton Beam Induces Efficient Cell Killing in A549 Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells Somnath Ghosh, 1 Nagesh N. Bhat, 2 S. Santra, 3 R. G. Thomas, 3 S.K. Gupta, 3 R.K. Choudhury, 3 and Malini Krishna 1 Radiation Biology and Health Sciences Division, 1 Radiological Physics and Advisory Division, 2 Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai, India 3 Cancer Invest Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Chicago Library on 06/10/11 For personal use only. ABSTRACT The aim of the current study was to determine the signaling differences between γ- and proton beam-irradiations. A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells were irradiated with 2 Gy proton beam or γ-radiation. Proton beam was found to be more cytotoxic than γ-radiation. Proton beam-irradiated cells showed phosphorylation of H2AX, ATM, Chk2, and p53. The mechanism of excessive cell killing in proton beam-irradiated cells was found to be upregulation of Bax and downregulation of Bcl-2. The noteworthy finding of this study is the biphasic activation of the sensor proteins, ATM, and DNA-PK and no activation of ATR by proton irradiation. INTRODUCTION Exposureof mammalian cells to ionizing radiation leads to the activation of several signaling pathways that result in apoptosis. Although, the end point, apoptosis is effectively activated by conventional X-ray treatment, the development of radioresistance following therapy remains a major cause for concern. Clinicians are now favoring proton beam therapy to avoid the issue (1–6). However, the mechanism of cell killing by proton beam is not yet well delineated. Lung cancer is a frequently occurring, mostly lethal disease in all countries worldwide (7). It is one of the most commonly diagnosed types of cancer and has the highest death rate (8, 9). Overall, fewer than 10% of people with primary lung cancer are alive 5 years after diagnosis. Depending on tumor size, location, and histology, several treatment options are available, including surgery and radiotherapy (RT), both often combined with chemotherapy (10). A major problem remains local tumor control (11, 12). Therefore, new ways to deliver radiotherapy beyond photons have been sought for, including protons (13, 14) Keywords Proton beam, ATM, p53, Bax, Bcl-2 Correspondence to: Malini Krishna Radiation Biology and Health Sciences Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Trombay, Mumbai India, 400085 email: malini@barc.gov.in; malinik00@gmail.com and carbon ions (15). Furthermore, treatment with charged particle radiation has several potential advantages over treatment with γ or X-ray radiation such as the Bragg peak enables precise localization of the radiation dose, an inverted depth-dose distribution, a higher relative biological effectiveness (RBE), and a lower cellular capability for repair of radiation injury. Because of their superior dose distribution, a therapeutic gain can be expected with charged particles (1–4). Although proton beams are currently being used for the treatment of many cancers (1–6), the mechanism of cell killing and its variance from γ -irradiation is not well understood. Understanding the specific biological effects of charged particle radiation on cancer cells could also provide valuable insights for the design of novel therapeutic applications for the treatment of cancers, which are resistant to many types of therapies. Moreover, therapies can be designed only if the signaling pathway is understood. A cytological manifestation of nuclear activity in response to ionizing radiation (IR) is the formation of the socalled IR-induced foci (IRIF) (16). IRIFs are dynamic, microscopically discernible structures containing thousands of copies of proteins, including γ H2AX, ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), BRCA1, 53BP1, MDC1, RAD51, and the MRE11/RAD50/NBS1 (MRN) complex, which accumulate in the vicinity of a DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) (17, 18). It is being appreciated lately that DNA repair pathways activated by charged particle radiation might be different from those studied after γ -irradiation. When exposed to ionizing radiation, eukaryotic cells also activate checkpoint pathways to delay the progression of the 615
Page 1:
RADIATION INDUCED SIGNALING IN MAMM
Page 4 and 5:
DECLARATION I, hereby declare that
Page 6 and 7:
CONTENTS Page No. SYNOPSIS………
Page 8 and 9:
2.11 Measurement of NO production
Page 10 and 11:
PREAMBLE SYNOPSIS Ionising radiatio
Page 12 and 13:
SYNOPSIS Aims and Objectives: To St
Page 14 and 15:
SYNOPSIS 2.6 Immunofluorescence sta
Page 16 and 17:
SYNOPSIS ATM gene expression, which
Page 18 and 19:
SYNOPSIS Percentage Survival 100 80
Page 20 and 21:
SYNOPSIS Ratio of Rad52 to Actin Ra
Page 22 and 23:
Relative Phosphorylation 45 40 35 3
Page 24 and 25:
SYNOPSIS Fig. 3.3A Clonogenic Cell
Page 26 and 27:
SYNOPSIS (A) Av No. of phospho BRCA
Page 28 and 29:
SYNOPSIS Percentage Survival 120 10
Page 30 and 31:
SYNOPSIS Fig.3.4B. Existance of cro
Page 32 and 33:
SYNOPSIS Fig. 3.4EDNA damage in EL-
Page 34 and 35:
SYNOPSIS subsequent cytotoxicity ca
Page 36 and 37:
SYNOPSIS [4] Hall, E. J. Radiobiolo
Page 38 and 39:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION
Page 40 and 41:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 15.8% 9.56%
Page 42 and 43:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION far apart an
Page 44 and 45:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION and are more
Page 46 and 47:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.3 DNA dama
Page 48 and 49:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION associates w
Page 50 and 51:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION are unable t
Page 52 and 53:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Perhaps one
Page 54 and 55:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION occurs at DS
Page 56 and 57:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION related prot
Page 58 and 59:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION damage must
Page 60 and 61:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION At the prese
Page 62 and 63:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION predominant
Page 64 and 65:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION provide a me
Page 66 and 67:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION hypersensiti
Page 68 and 69:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION cycle-specif
Page 70 and 71:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.4 Overview
Page 72 and 73:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.4.1 Radiat
Page 74 and 75:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION interaction
Page 76 and 77:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION p90S6 kinase
Page 78 and 79:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION CD4 (formerl
Page 80 and 81:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION unrepaired d
Page 82 and 83:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION well to the
Page 84 and 85:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.6 Radiatio
Page 86 and 87:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION becomes pote
Page 88 and 89:
CHAPTER 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS MAT
Page 90 and 91:
CHAPTER 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.2
Page 92 and 93:
CHAPTER 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS res
Page 94 and 95:
CHAPTER 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS Arr
Page 96 and 97:
CHAPTER 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS PBS
Page 98 and 99:
CHAPTER 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS the
Page 100 and 101:
CHAPTER 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.1
Page 102 and 103:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS RESULTS 93
Page 104 and 105:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS fractionated regi
Page 106 and 107:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS On comparison of
Page 108 and 109:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS Table 3.1.2A List
Page 110 and 111:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 80 NM_002185 IL7R
Page 112 and 113:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS SAA2 149 AU134977
Page 114 and 115:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 221 LOC643167 RNA
Page 116 and 117:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 299 BF244402 FBXO
Page 118 and 119:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS CDK4) 57 AU152107
Page 120 and 121:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 134 AL045793 METT
Page 122 and 123:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 58 AF237813 ABAT
Page 124 and 125:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 127 AI809749 ORMD
Page 126 and 127:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 31 BE615699 UNC84
Page 128 and 129:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 47 AF026303 SULT1
Page 130 and 131:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 117 BF062193 CYor
Page 132 and 133:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 187 AL036662 ---
Page 134 and 135:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 52 AV686514 EMP2
Page 136 and 137:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS exposed to 10 Gy
Page 138 and 139:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS Fig.3.1.4 Gene ex
Page 140 and 141:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS Fig. 3.1.6 Radiat
Page 142 and 143:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS Fig. 3.1.7 Transl
Page 144 and 145:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 3.1.9 Stabilizati
Page 146 and 147:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 23±1.5% (Fig. 3.
Page 148 and 149:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS whereas only the
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS with equal doses
Page 156 and 157:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS Fig.3.3.1.2 Forma
Page 158 and 159:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS Fig.3.3.1.3 Phosp
Page 160 and 161:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS (7.5±0.64) (Fig.
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS Fig.3.3.1.7b Phos
Page 166 and 167:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 3.3.2 Oxygen beam
Page 168 and 169:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS in all the cells.
Page 170 and 171:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 3.3.2.3 Radiation
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS Fig.3.3.2.7 Apopt
Page 178 and 179:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS PMA stimulated U9
Page 180 and 181:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS Fig.3.4.2. Exista
Page 182 and 183:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS up-regulation of
Page 184 and 185:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS Fig.3.4.3.2 NO pr
Page 186 and 187:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 3.4.3.4 Apoptotic
Page 188 and 189:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 3.4.4 Bystander e
Page 190 and 191:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS Fig.3.4.4b DNA da
Page 192 and 193:
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS Fig.3.4.5a Gene e
Page 194 and 195:
CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION DISCUSSION 185
Page 196 and 197:
CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION directly expos
Page 198 and 199:
CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION dose is delive
Page 200 and 201:
CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION A clear cause
Page 202 and 203:
CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION 4.2 Proton bea
Page 204 and 205:
CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION Although the e
Page 206 and 207:
CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION Similar number
Page 208 and 209:
CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION the mechanism
Page 210 and 211:
CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION Thus unlike th
Page 212 and 213:
CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION different from
Page 214 and 215:
CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION upregulates ma
Page 216 and 217:
CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION Numerous studi
Page 218 and 219:
CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION inhibition of
Page 220 and 221:
CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION The survival o
Page 222 and 223:
CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES [1] Khan, F. T
Page 224 and 225:
CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES [19] Woo, R. A
Page 226 and 227:
CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES [35] Nghiem, P
Page 228 and 229:
CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES [52] McKay, B.
Page 230 and 231:
CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES [69] Cary, R.
Page 232 and 233:
CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES [84] Uziel, T.
Page 234 and 235:
CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES [98] Liu, Y.;
Page 236 and 237:
CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES [111] Fei, P.;
Page 238 and 239:
CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES [127] Frank, K
Page 240 and 241:
CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES [141] Pierce,
Page 242 and 243:
CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES [156] Roots, R
Page 244 and 245: CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES [171] Xia, Z.;
Page 246 and 247: CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES (MAP) kinase c
Page 248 and 249: CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES phosphorylatio
Page 250 and 251: CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES [211] Anderson
Page 252 and 253: CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES [229] Konca, K
Page 254 and 255: CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES [245] Kastan,
Page 256 and 257: CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES [261] Miralbel
Page 258 and 259: CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES [278] Weizman,
Page 260 and 261: CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES [294] Zhou, H.
Page 262 and 263: PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS Publ
Page 264 and 265: Mutation Research 729 (2012) 61-72
Page 266 and 267: S. Ghosh, M. Krishna / Mutation Res
Page 278 and 279: 12 S. Ghosh et al. / Mutation Resea
Page 288 and 289: 192 S. Ghosh et al. / Mutation Rese
Page 296 and 297: Cancer Invest Downloaded from infor
Page 304 and 305: 1568 I. J. Radiation Oncology d Bio
Page 310: 1574 I. J. Radiation Oncology d Bio
show all

LIFE01200604005 Shri Somnath Ghosh - Homi Bhabha National ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?