07.01.2014 Views

LIFE09200604007 Tabish - Homi Bhabha National Institute

LIFE09200604007 Tabish - Homi Bhabha National Institute

LIFE09200604007 Tabish - Homi Bhabha National Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Review of Literature<br />

2.6 Genotype phenotype correlation studies<br />

Since last few decades a number of studies have reported association of gene<br />

polymorphisms with cancer risk. However the real implication of these gene<br />

polymorphisms with increased cancer risk can only be interpreted if they have any<br />

functional significance. Therefore undertaking genotype-phenotype correlation studies<br />

is extremely important to understand the functional significance of the gene<br />

polymorphisms. Numerous studies have been conducted during last one decade to<br />

evaluate the functional significance of gene polymorphisms in normal individuals 46-48 .<br />

This approach of understanding effect of gene polymorphisms at functional level has<br />

been phenomenal and has been applied to deduce the functional significance of genetic<br />

predisposition in cancer risk 49-52 .<br />

One of such reports describes alteration in the apoptotic capacity to be a risk<br />

factor for lung cancer development and the risk was observed to be modulated by the<br />

Fas -A 670 G polymorphism 51 . Similarly, variations in p53 gene have been associated<br />

with apoptosis and DNA repair and in turn with lung cancer risk 53 . On the contrary<br />

XPA gene polymorphism, a DNA binding protein in the nucleotide excision repair<br />

pathway, has been observed to modulate repair capacity and is associated with<br />

decreased lung cancer risk, especially in the presence of exposure to tobacco<br />

carcinogens 52 . Other than lung cancer, analogous reports are available for breast cancer<br />

also where polymorphisms in nucleotide excision repair genes and DNA repair capacity<br />

phenotype has been with breast cancer risk 54, 55 . In another report by Minard et al.<br />

evaluation of glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms and mutagen sensitivity as risk<br />

factors for the development of second primary tumours in 303 patients previously<br />

diagnosed with early-stage head and neck cancer has been done 49 . These studies<br />

demonstrate the functional significance of genetic variation in different individuals and<br />

then their probable implication on various phenotypes and eventually cancer risk, hence<br />

emphasizing the importance of undertaking genotype-phenotype correlation studies in<br />

understanding UADT MPN pathogenesis.<br />

2.7 Model system: Epstein Barr virus transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines<br />

In order to understand the etiology of UADT MPN there is a need to undertake<br />

genotype phenotype correlation studies. However, one of the prime requisites for<br />

performing long term genotype-phenotype correlation studies is the continuous supply<br />

of starting parent material. This can be overcome to some extent by establishing<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!