A New Simple Technique (PDF)

A New Simple Technique (PDF) A New Simple Technique (PDF)

07.01.2014 Views

Refer to: Manchester GH: Tattoo removal-A new simple technique. Calif Med 118:10-12, Mar 1973 Table salt applied by salabrasion, tattooing or dermabrasion was used in the treatment of unwanted tattoos in 25 cases. With removal of the eschar at the treated site, the unwanted pigmentation was reduced by half, and there was further dimming to virtual disappearance during further healing. Tattoo Removal A New Simple Technique GARY H. MANCHESTER, MD San Diego THE PROBLEM OF TATTOO REMOVAL has been with man a long time. History records the Egyptians in 4000 B.C. to be the first to use tattoos for identification of their social classes.1 This practice was revived by Hitler to recognize the enemies of the Third Reich, while inmates of our penal institutions use the self-inflicted ink tattoo for initiation of a new prisoner. Tattooing as a decorative and artistic form first foun'd expression in Europe at the end of the 19th century. Lady Randolph Churchill is said to have had a snake placed around her arm. This art form found great acceptance with the American service man as an expression of his manhood during the past century. After World War II, the incidence of tattoos began to decline. Social pressures were brought to bear in the large cities, and health departments began closing down the "art parlors." The medical literature was busy reporting the transmission of syphilis, tuberculosis, and infectious hepatitis through the use of the tattoo needle.1-3 In 1948 Bromberg published his psychiatric study of the tattooed personality.4 Dr. Bromberg concluded that emotional instability was the underlying cause for this self-embellishment. He felt that the tattoo was either a form of exhibitionism or the means for a weak neurotic to associate himself with a strong group of people-soldiers. With this report and the public awareness of a problem, employers began refusing positions of responsibility on the basis of a previous indiscretion. In 1969 the Submitted September 21, 1972. Reprint requests to: G. H, Manchester, MD, 7910 A. Frost Street, Suite 205, San Diego, Ca. 92123. United Kingdom passed a law restricting the use of tattooing in minors.5 Recently requests for tattoo removal have increased greatly in the United States due to the use of these markings in the initiation rites of the various Hippie-Yippie cults. With the increased demand, I found myself without a means of removing tattoos quickly and inexpensively. Approximately two years ago, I began experimenting, with the patients' permission, on new methods for tattoo removal. The basic problem is that the accepted methods of treatment-serial excision or excision, and grafting-either cause a spread or an unsightly scar, or trade one blemish for two defects. Since 54 A.D., physicians have tried to remove tattoos without leaving a scar. Aetius (543 A.D.) was the first to describe the use of salt and chemicals for the purpose.5 Klovekorn (1935) described the abrasion of skin with table salt in order to remove tattoo pigment;6 and Crittenden recently confirmed these results and named the process salabrasion.7 Salabrasion, the removal of tattoos by superficial abrasion of the skin with table salt, is merely one means of delivering sodium chloride to the underlying dermis. I have found that salabrasion, dermabrasion,' and tattooing with table salt or a salt solution give equally good results with minimal scarring. Technique The area to be treated is first shaved and prepared with Phisohex®. A local anesthetic is then infiltrated into the skin when a dermabrador or 10 MARCH 1973 * 118 * 3

Refer to: Manchester GH: Tattoo removal-A new simple technique.<br />

Calif Med 118:10-12, Mar 1973<br />

Table salt applied by salabrasion, tattooing<br />

or dermabrasion was used in<br />

the treatment of unwanted tattoos in 25<br />

cases. With removal of the eschar at<br />

the treated site, the unwanted pigmentation<br />

was reduced by half, and there<br />

was further dimming to virtual disappearance<br />

during further healing.<br />

Tattoo Removal<br />

A <strong>New</strong> <strong>Simple</strong> <strong>Technique</strong><br />

GARY H. MANCHESTER, MD<br />

San Diego<br />

THE PROBLEM OF TATTOO REMOVAL has been<br />

with man a long time. History records the Egyptians<br />

in 4000 B.C. to be the first to use tattoos<br />

for identification of their social classes.1 This practice<br />

was revived by Hitler to recognize the enemies<br />

of the Third Reich, while inmates of our penal<br />

institutions use the self-inflicted ink tattoo for initiation<br />

of a new prisoner.<br />

Tattooing as a decorative and artistic form first<br />

foun'd expression in Europe at the end of the 19th<br />

century. Lady Randolph Churchill is said to have<br />

had a snake placed around her arm. This art form<br />

found great acceptance with the American service<br />

man as an expression of his manhood during the<br />

past century.<br />

After World War II, the incidence of tattoos<br />

began to decline. Social pressures were brought<br />

to bear in the large cities, and health departments<br />

began closing down the "art parlors." The medical<br />

literature was busy reporting the transmission<br />

of syphilis, tuberculosis, and infectious hepatitis<br />

through the use of the tattoo needle.1-3 In 1948<br />

Bromberg published his psychiatric study of the<br />

tattooed personality.4 Dr. Bromberg concluded<br />

that emotional instability was the underlying cause<br />

for this self-embellishment. He felt that the tattoo<br />

was either a form of exhibitionism or the means<br />

for a weak neurotic to associate himself with a<br />

strong group of people-soldiers. With this report<br />

and the public awareness of a problem, employers<br />

began refusing positions of responsibility on the<br />

basis of a previous indiscretion. In 1969 the<br />

Submitted September 21, 1972.<br />

Reprint requests to: G. H, Manchester, MD, 7910 A. Frost<br />

Street, Suite 205, San Diego, Ca. 92123.<br />

United Kingdom passed a law restricting the use<br />

of tattooing in minors.5<br />

Recently requests for tattoo removal have increased<br />

greatly in the United States due to the use<br />

of these markings in the initiation rites of the<br />

various Hippie-Yippie cults. With the increased<br />

demand, I found myself without a means of removing<br />

tattoos quickly and inexpensively. Approximately<br />

two years ago, I began experimenting,<br />

with the patients' permission, on new methods for<br />

tattoo removal.<br />

The basic problem is that the accepted methods<br />

of treatment-serial excision or excision, and grafting-either<br />

cause a spread or an unsightly scar,<br />

or trade one blemish for two defects. Since 54<br />

A.D., physicians have tried to remove tattoos without<br />

leaving a scar. Aetius (543 A.D.) was the<br />

first to describe the use of salt and chemicals for<br />

the purpose.5 Klovekorn (1935) described the<br />

abrasion of skin with table salt in order to remove<br />

tattoo pigment;6 and Crittenden recently confirmed<br />

these results and named the process salabrasion.7<br />

Salabrasion, the removal of tattoos by<br />

superficial abrasion of the skin with table salt, is<br />

merely one means of delivering sodium chloride to<br />

the underlying dermis. I have found that salabrasion,<br />

dermabrasion,' and tattooing with table salt<br />

or a salt solution give equally good results with<br />

minimal scarring.<br />

<strong>Technique</strong><br />

The area to be treated is first shaved and prepared<br />

with Phisohex®. A local anesthetic is then<br />

infiltrated into the skin when a dermabrador or<br />

10 MARCH 1973 * 118 * 3


*:l^E..S<br />

k-A<br />

1/~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o<br />

Figure 1.-A. a six-year-old multicolor tattoo before treatment. B. 72 hours after abrasion with table salt, the<br />

treated area has the characterstics of tanned leather. C. on the eighth day the eschar separated from the underlying<br />

dermis, taking about half the pigment with it, and, D. the appearance of the site 38 days after treatment.<br />

tattoo machine is used. Anesthetic is not necessary<br />

if the patient abrades the skin himself, since the<br />

salt acts as a local anesthetic.8 The patient is then<br />

instructed to wrap a moist 4x4 gauze sponge impregnated<br />

with salt around his index and middle<br />

fingers and to begin rubbing the tattoo he wishes<br />

to remove. The abrasion continues till the skin<br />

becomes "blood" red and appears like good granulation<br />

tissue. This usually takes 30 to 40 minutes.<br />

At this point, the treated area is covered with antibiotic<br />

ointment and a sterile dressing which is left<br />

in place for three days.<br />

When a dermabrador or tattoo gun is used, the<br />

skin is either superficially abraded or punctured<br />

in the desired areas and then covered with a layer<br />

of table salt. The insult to the dermis must be very<br />

superficial. The mixture of blood and plasma will<br />

carry the sodium chloride to the dermis. At this<br />

point, when the treated area will look raw but<br />

not blood red, it is covered with a layer of salt<br />

for four hours. The dressing is then changed and<br />

the wound cleaned and redressed with an antibiotic<br />

ointment for an additional three days.<br />

On the third postoperative day the treated area<br />

is dry and has the appearance of tanned leather.<br />

This salted area separates between the seventh<br />

and twelfth postoperative days. With eschar separation<br />

one may see that about half of the ink has<br />

been removed. Still more ink leaves the treated<br />

area in exudate while the skin is healing. The<br />

abraded area remains erythematous for approximately<br />

six weeks and has a tendency to become<br />

hyperpigmented if exposed to sunlight. The skin<br />

heals quickly and with virtually no scarring. A<br />

second treatment can be administered six to eight<br />

weeks after the first.<br />

Results<br />

CASE 1. A 25-year-old white man who six<br />

years earlier had had a multi-colored tattoo professionally<br />

applied to his forearm (Figure 1),<br />

removed about ninety percent of the tattoo pigment<br />

by use of salabrasion for 35 minutes. Fortyeight<br />

hours after treatment the skin at the site had<br />

taken on the characteristics of tanned leather.<br />

Eight days after salabrasion, the eschar had separated,<br />

taking with it approximately half of the tattoo<br />

pigment. The skin had completely healed by<br />

the 38th day. At this time, hair was already growing<br />

from the treated area and there was mild<br />

hyperpigmentation secondary to sun exposure.<br />

CASE 2. The patient, a white man 22 years of<br />

age, had had a "homemade" tattoo with india ink<br />

applied to his left arm two years before treatment<br />

(Figure 2). On instruction, he used salabrasion<br />

for 30 minutes on one area of the tattoo. After<br />

21 days the treated area had lost about nine-tenths<br />

of its ink content. There was an eczematous eruption<br />

at the site, secondary to the antibiotic dressing<br />

used.<br />

CASE 3. A 24-year-old white man with a professionally<br />

applied black ink tattoo that had been<br />

on his forearm for five years was treated with a<br />

tattoo gun whose needles were set at 1 mm of<br />

penetration. The treatment was applied for four<br />

or five minutes at the center of the tattoo. The area<br />

was then wiped dry and covered with a layer of<br />

CALIFORNIA MEDICINE 11<br />

The Western Journal of Medicine


Figure 2. Left, a two-year-old "homemade" india ink<br />

tattoo. Right, three weeks after the first treatment to<br />

the hat area only. The eczematous reaction was secondary<br />

to a topical antibiotic.<br />

table salt for four hours. The salt was removed<br />

and a sterile dressing applied. At the end of four<br />

weeks, the center of the flower showed decided<br />

loss in pigmentation (Figure 3).<br />

Discussion<br />

How salt acts to remove pigment-impregnated<br />

skin is not known. Success may be attributed to<br />

the initial tanning which removes the majority of<br />

superficial epidermal and dermal pigment, with<br />

an increased phagocytic response in macrophages<br />

following. At the end of the first week, only about<br />

half of pigment is removed with the initial eschar<br />

but during the following 14 days additional fading<br />

occurs.<br />

Boo-Chai reported that superficial dermabrasion<br />

of tattoos creates an inflammatory response<br />

and thus promotes the "biologic removal" of pigment<br />

through the lymphatics and the sloughing<br />

of superficial macrophages.9 Clabaugh postulated<br />

that the pigment-laden phagocytes may become<br />

mobile and migrate to the wound surface where<br />

they are removed by daily dressing changes.'0 The<br />

treatment of tattoos with salt may enhance this<br />

phagocytic response.<br />

From a review of the literature it appears that<br />

most early techniques owe their success to the<br />

inflammatory reaction of salt or a caustic substance.<br />

Aetius, in his treatise, directed, "On the<br />

sixth, remove the mixture and prick the area with<br />

a sharp-pointed instrument, wipe off the blood<br />

Figure 3.-Left, a five-year-old professionally applied<br />

tattoo, before treatment. Right, four weeks after treatment<br />

by superficial penetration of the skin with a tattoo<br />

gun and topical application of salt at the site of densest<br />

pigmentation, the treated area is almost entirely depigmented.<br />

with a sponge, and powder the punctures with a<br />

thin layer of salt."5 Scutt recently reported on the<br />

the Variot method of over tattooing with a 50<br />

percent tannic acid solution.5 I have used a strong<br />

solution of phenol.<br />

In the treatment of 200 tattoos in a two-year<br />

period I became dissatisfied with most methods because<br />

of the expense in time and money. With<br />

superficial dermabrasion, although it has enjoyed<br />

great success over the past ten years',9"-1 there is<br />

occasional atrophic scarring or poor result.<br />

In a more recent series I have used salt in<br />

treatment by light dermabrasion in ten cases, tattooing<br />

in two cases and salabrasion in 13. In all<br />

cases there was uniform removal of pigment in<br />

the treated areas with virtually no scarring.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Roenigk HH: Tattooing-history, techniques, complications,<br />

removal. Cleve Clin Q 36:179-186, 1971<br />

2. Rook AJ, Thomas PJB: Social and medical aspects of tattooing.<br />

Practitioner 169:60-66, 1952<br />

3. Smith BF: Occurrence of hepatitis in recently tattooed service<br />

personnel. JAMA 144:1074-1076, 1950<br />

4. Bromberg W: Psychologic motives in tattooing. Arch Neurol<br />

Psychiatr 33:228-232, 1948<br />

5. Scutt RWB: The chemical removal of tattoos. Br J P Surg<br />

25:189-194, 1972<br />

6. Kloevekorn GH: Eine einfache methode der entferlung<br />

von taetowierungen. Dermatologische Wochenscrhrift 101:1271,<br />

1935<br />

7. Crittenden FM: Salabrasion-removal of tattoos by superficial<br />

abrasion with table salt. Cutis 7:295-300, 1971<br />

8. Personal observation<br />

9. Boo-Chai K: The decorataive tattoo-Its removal by dermabrasion.<br />

Plastic Reconstr Surg 32:559-563, 1963<br />

10. Clabaugh W: Removal of tattoos by superficial dermabrasion.<br />

Arch Dermatol 98:515-521, 1968<br />

11. Loria PR: Dermabrasion-Principles of planing. J LA Med<br />

Soc 112:401-405, 1960<br />

12 MARCH 1973 * 118 * 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!