07.01.2014 Views

World Trade Organization - Harvard Model United Nations

World Trade Organization - Harvard Model United Nations

World Trade Organization - Harvard Model United Nations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> <strong>Organization</strong><br />

supply side (the country that exports the goods, which<br />

in these cases are the low-income countries). The studies<br />

recommended improvements in customs and export<br />

agencies and other trade-related institutions. 15<br />

When is Aid Effective? The Paris Declaration<br />

The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness sets out<br />

the principles that nations should follow to maximize<br />

effectiveness of their aid. These include: 1) ownership<br />

– the donor country must respect the right and<br />

responsibility of the partner country to exercise authority<br />

over its own development policies and strategies; 2)<br />

alignment – donors will align their assistances as stated<br />

by the partner country’s own development agenda and<br />

will try to support the partner country’s own systems<br />

(regulatory, technological and others) rather than<br />

developing their own parallel system in the country; 3)<br />

mutual accountability – donors and partners must be<br />

committed to mutual accountability and transparency.<br />

Donors should provide transparent and timely<br />

information regarding their aid flows to the partner<br />

countries while partner countries must periodically assess<br />

the progress in the implementation of development<br />

strategies; 4) harmonization – donors and partner<br />

countries will establish common arrangements, simplify<br />

procedures for policy planning and implementation, and<br />

share information with each other (making it effective).<br />

These principles ensure that the partner countries take<br />

ownership of their own development strategies and that<br />

donor countries listen to and understand the specific<br />

needs of each partner country. Giving partner countries<br />

more say in how their reforms are undertaken will ensure<br />

greater success rate.<br />

Effectiveness of aid for trade<br />

Despite having clear principles that would<br />

theoretically maximize the effectiveness of aid for trade,<br />

it is hard to quantify the effects of aid for trade since there<br />

are no clear indicators of aid for trade’s direct effect on<br />

economic growth. Some donor countries use indicators<br />

like the increase in trade volume and “adoption and<br />

implementation of trade policies that positively impact<br />

the poor” that are often meaningless because the effects<br />

of those policies often cannot be achieved or measured<br />

within the donor aid for trade program’s life cycle. These<br />

indicators are further influenced by other factors such<br />

as other donor aid, domestic producers improving trade<br />

performance through private investments, and domestic<br />

government policies that help the poor. Thus, it is often<br />

hard to trace the growth of trade and the economy<br />

directly to a specific donor’s aid program. 16<br />

Measuring effectiveness is complicated by the fact<br />

that it is difficult to measure the positive outcomes<br />

of these trade-related assistances. For some countries,<br />

simply changing the government’s mindset about why<br />

export-related infrastructure is important (when other<br />

alternatives like subsidies can quickly spur production<br />

and economic growth) can be a significant achievement.<br />

For others, changing approach to trade-related assistance<br />

such as focusing on revising tax and regulatory systems<br />

can also be an achievement. 17<br />

Current Situation<br />

South America<br />

South America has experienced tremendous growth<br />

within the past decade, driven mostly by a boom in<br />

prices for the region’s commodities. Countries in South<br />

America were early in following trade liberalization<br />

recommendations by the GATT and WTO and<br />

many have already formed regional trade pacts such<br />

as the Andean Community (CAN) and MERCOSUR<br />

economic blocs. These economic blocs have facilitated<br />

regional cooperation in trade, promoted exports in<br />

various countries, and led to the creation of trade-related<br />

institutions in most of the countries. All these factors<br />

have led to an average of 20% increase in exports between<br />

2001 and 2005. 18<br />

South American countries’ main trade challenges<br />

include the large number of trade negotiations going<br />

on at same time. Due to the fast pace and large number<br />

of negotiation meetings, policymakers do not have<br />

enough time to properly analyze options and seek the<br />

most optimal solutions. The focus on forming trade<br />

agreements also takes attention away from government<br />

support for research & development and improvements<br />

in regulation for product standards. 19<br />

Another important issue to be resolved is the lack<br />

of cohesion between different trade support institutions<br />

(TSI) throughout the region. The various national, local,<br />

sectoral, and technical TSIs often have insufficient<br />

coordination and duplicate functions among themselves.<br />

As a result, the TSIs can’t optimize the use of their<br />

resources in helping governments develop regulation in<br />

such areas as branding, certification, supply chains, and<br />

design. 20<br />

8<br />

Specialized General Assembly Agencies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!