07.01.2014 Views

World Trade Organization - Harvard Model United Nations

World Trade Organization - Harvard Model United Nations

World Trade Organization - Harvard Model United Nations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> <strong>Organization</strong><br />

initiative at the global level, the donor level, and the<br />

recipient country level, ensuring that differences in<br />

priorities are reconciled so that aid for trade programs<br />

can be as effective as possible.<br />

This initiative is the brainchild of the WTO, and<br />

represents the core of the WTO. The success of this<br />

initiative means sustainable economic growth for<br />

developing countries, leading to improved health and<br />

education, alleviation of poverty, and improved standards<br />

of living. The WTO will be one step closer to fulfilling<br />

its stated mission if Aid for <strong>Trade</strong><br />

can successfully revolutionize aid to<br />

developing countries.<br />

Emergence of Aid for <strong>Trade</strong><br />

Aid for <strong>Trade</strong> first emerged as an<br />

issue at the Doha Development Round,<br />

one of the WTO’s trade-negotiation<br />

rounds that began in 2001. Although<br />

the issue became prominent only in the<br />

past decade, the underlying problems<br />

that led to a discussion of Aid for <strong>Trade</strong><br />

are traced back to the Uruguay Round,<br />

WTO’s 1986 trade-negotiation<br />

round. The Uruguay Round was a<br />

comprehensive re-evaluation of all the<br />

original GATT articles and sought to<br />

extend the trading system into new<br />

areas including trade in services and<br />

in intellectual property. Participating<br />

countries also discussed reforms in<br />

agriculture and textiles. The theme of the Round was<br />

trade liberalization and many commentators believed<br />

that liberalizing trade would provide significant benefits<br />

for all, especially developing countries, and assumed that<br />

it could not be harmful. 3<br />

While the Uruguay Round created an international<br />

trade dispute settlement system, the <strong>Trade</strong> Policy Review<br />

Mechanism (which provided for the first systematic,<br />

comprehensive, and regular review of national trade<br />

policies of GATT members), and a built-in agenda that<br />

set timelines for further negotiations, it also created<br />

new problems. Complaints emerged from developing<br />

countries about the high costs of compliance to<br />

international rules about intellectual property and stricter<br />

customs rules. 4<br />

After the signing of the Uruguay Round Agreement,<br />

Africa trade ministers meeting in Tunis in October 1994<br />

urged the international community for more cooperation<br />

The Doha Development Round started<br />

in 2001 and continues today.<br />

and help in creating trade policies that would promote<br />

trade and economic growth and help them integrate into<br />

the new Multilateral Trading System. The WTO, <strong>United</strong><br />

<strong>Nations</strong> Conference on <strong>Trade</strong> and Development, and the<br />

International <strong>Trade</strong> Center responded by establishing the<br />

Joint Integrated Technical Assistance Program (JITAP), a<br />

trade capacity-building program. 5<br />

JITAP<br />

The JITAP’s three objectives are: “build national capacity<br />

to understand the evolving MTS and its implications for<br />

external trade; adapt the national trading<br />

system to the obligations and disciplines of<br />

the new MTS; seek maximum advantage from<br />

the new MTS by enhancing the readiness of<br />

exporters.” To accomplish these, the three<br />

Geneva organizations set up an elaborate system<br />

of technology, human, and communication<br />

power. These include: 1) national networks<br />

of trainers and experts in WTO-trade<br />

related issues that would advise low- and<br />

middle-income countries on policymaking;<br />

2) “Internet-based Communication and<br />

Discussion Facility” that would lower the cost<br />

of communication between countries and<br />

the Geneva organizations; 3) simultaneous<br />

implementation of programs in several<br />

countries to maximize efficient use of<br />

resources through large scale management<br />

implementations. 6<br />

The Integrated Framework<br />

In 1996, the WTO took further steps to strengthen<br />

least-developed countries’ trade capacities through the<br />

creation of the Integrated Framework for <strong>Trade</strong>-Related<br />

Technical Assistance to the Least Developed Countries.<br />

The Integrated Framework is a multi-agency, multi donor<br />

program assisting least developed countries (LDCs) that<br />

“supports LDC governments in trade capacity building<br />

and integrating trade issues into overall national<br />

development strategies” (IF website). By bringing together<br />

various agencies and LDCs, the IF ensures a coordinated<br />

approach to tackling the most pressing trade-related<br />

issues of the LDCs. (IF explained). The core agencies of<br />

the IF are the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the<br />

International <strong>Trade</strong> Centre (ITC), the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Nations</strong><br />

Conference on <strong>Trade</strong> and Development (UNCTAD),<br />

the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Nations</strong> Development Program (UNDP),<br />

the <strong>World</strong> Bank, and the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> <strong>Organization</strong><br />

(WTO). 7<br />

6<br />

Specialized General Assembly Agencies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!