PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council
PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council
PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Planning Committee – 25 th February 2009 4.1<br />
proposed use of the buildings as flats would unduly affect the existing living<br />
conditions of the occupier’s of neighbouring properties. There are no objections from<br />
Public Protection in this respect.<br />
13.17 Concerns have been raised by neighbours to the possibility of un-neighbourly<br />
behaviour. It is considered that it would be difficult to sustain an objection on this<br />
basis. The Private Sector Housing Team have raised no objections informally to the<br />
scheme.<br />
13.18 The concern raised by neighbours with regard to the occupiers of the flats, the<br />
flats bringing a lack of community spirit, incorrectly supervised tenants, and the need<br />
to retain a family area, are not material planning considerations and cannot be taken<br />
into account in the formulation of a decision on this planning application.<br />
Impact on Conservation Area<br />
13.19 The originally submitted proposal incorporated a dividing wall at the bedroom<br />
to the front of the property at ground floor. Concerns were raised with regard to the<br />
visual impact on the Conservation Area with the provision of a dividing wall and the<br />
potential loss of the bay window. The application was subsequently amended to<br />
remove the dividing wall to negate any potential impact on the Conservation Area,<br />
and the internal layout amended to create a larger 1 bedroom flat at ground floor,<br />
rather than the originally proposed 2 bedroom.<br />
13.20 It is therefore considered that the development would not have a detrimental<br />
impact on the Conservation Area, and the will preserve the character of the<br />
Conservation Area as all external features will be retained and there will be no<br />
external alterations.<br />
Highways Issues<br />
13.21 Concerns have been raised by the <strong>Council</strong>s Traffic and Transportation section<br />
with regard to the accessibility of the property in terms of the lack of transport links<br />
and the potential for it to encourage vehicular use. However, a previous application<br />
has been approved at 102 Grange Road for the conversion of a dwelling to four flats,<br />
which can be argued is further from the town centre than the application property<br />
and therefore occupiers of 78 Grange Road in theory will be more likely to walk into<br />
town. Additional evidence has been put forward by the applicant’s agent suggesting<br />
that there is a regular bus route 50 metres away between Thornville Road and<br />
Mulgrave Road. A bus stop is located approximately ten properties away from 78<br />
Grange Road, on Grange Road, which has a bus service running at approximately 1<br />
per hour. It is therefore considered than an objection of such grounds could not be<br />
sustained.<br />
13.22 Concerns were also raised by the <strong>Council</strong>s Traffic and Transportation section<br />
in relation to the apparent lack of parking provision with the development which will<br />
potentially exacerbate on-street parking problems in the area. However, Policy Hsg7<br />
states that parking requirements may be relaxed in instances where proposals for<br />
the conversion of dwellings into self contained flats, where there is either public<br />
4.1 Planning 25.02.09 Pl anning apps 76