07.01.2014 Views

PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council

PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council

PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Planning Committee – 25 th February 2009 4.1<br />

proposed use of the buildings as flats would unduly affect the existing living<br />

conditions of the occupier’s of neighbouring properties. There are no objections from<br />

Public Protection in this respect.<br />

13.17 Concerns have been raised by neighbours to the possibility of un-neighbourly<br />

behaviour. It is considered that it would be difficult to sustain an objection on this<br />

basis. The Private Sector Housing Team have raised no objections informally to the<br />

scheme.<br />

13.18 The concern raised by neighbours with regard to the occupiers of the flats, the<br />

flats bringing a lack of community spirit, incorrectly supervised tenants, and the need<br />

to retain a family area, are not material planning considerations and cannot be taken<br />

into account in the formulation of a decision on this planning application.<br />

Impact on Conservation Area<br />

13.19 The originally submitted proposal incorporated a dividing wall at the bedroom<br />

to the front of the property at ground floor. Concerns were raised with regard to the<br />

visual impact on the Conservation Area with the provision of a dividing wall and the<br />

potential loss of the bay window. The application was subsequently amended to<br />

remove the dividing wall to negate any potential impact on the Conservation Area,<br />

and the internal layout amended to create a larger 1 bedroom flat at ground floor,<br />

rather than the originally proposed 2 bedroom.<br />

13.20 It is therefore considered that the development would not have a detrimental<br />

impact on the Conservation Area, and the will preserve the character of the<br />

Conservation Area as all external features will be retained and there will be no<br />

external alterations.<br />

Highways Issues<br />

13.21 Concerns have been raised by the <strong>Council</strong>s Traffic and Transportation section<br />

with regard to the accessibility of the property in terms of the lack of transport links<br />

and the potential for it to encourage vehicular use. However, a previous application<br />

has been approved at 102 Grange Road for the conversion of a dwelling to four flats,<br />

which can be argued is further from the town centre than the application property<br />

and therefore occupiers of 78 Grange Road in theory will be more likely to walk into<br />

town. Additional evidence has been put forward by the applicant’s agent suggesting<br />

that there is a regular bus route 50 metres away between Thornville Road and<br />

Mulgrave Road. A bus stop is located approximately ten properties away from 78<br />

Grange Road, on Grange Road, which has a bus service running at approximately 1<br />

per hour. It is therefore considered than an objection of such grounds could not be<br />

sustained.<br />

13.22 Concerns were also raised by the <strong>Council</strong>s Traffic and Transportation section<br />

in relation to the apparent lack of parking provision with the development which will<br />

potentially exacerbate on-street parking problems in the area. However, Policy Hsg7<br />

states that parking requirements may be relaxed in instances where proposals for<br />

the conversion of dwellings into self contained flats, where there is either public<br />

4.1 Planning 25.02.09 Pl anning apps 76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!