PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council
PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council
PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Planning Committee – 25 th February 2009 4.1<br />
30. This is another blow to maintaining Hutton Avenue as a residential area.<br />
There are numerous multi occupancy facilities in Hutton and another one is<br />
not wanted.<br />
31. The development would change the ambience detrimentally.<br />
32. Need to consider the immediate and longer-term impact upon the<br />
environment and community.<br />
33. The residential character that has already been eroded and could well be<br />
irreparably damaged through the introduction of a bed and breakfast.<br />
34. Grave concern that once a property is converted fit for business use, then<br />
realistically the future prospects of converting back to a residential dwelling,<br />
will be outweighed by the prohibitive financial implications.<br />
35. The proposed plans make no provision for a separate residents lounge or<br />
dining area, a reception area nor a liquor licence. Objector questions whether<br />
the applicant is intending to secure residents attracted to <strong>Hartlepool</strong>’s tourist<br />
attractions.<br />
36. ‘North East Lincolnshire Local Plan (Supplementary Planning Guidance<br />
Notes) define bed and breakfast guesthouses as providing accommodation<br />
for people with no other permanent place of residence as distinct from hotels<br />
which provide accommodation for temporary visitors to an area’.<br />
37. List of guesthouses in <strong>Hartlepool</strong> produce by objector who states ‘this survey<br />
of guesthouses clearly illustrates that none of the above establishments are<br />
sited in predominantly residential areas’<br />
38. The primary objection of a Conservation Area is to actively encourage<br />
residents to re-instate original features for example boundary walling. The<br />
provision of a wider dropped kerb will prohibit this.<br />
39. The proposed parking arrangements would lead to the residents of the bed<br />
and breakfast to ‘juggle’ their vehicles to unblock vehicles of others staying at<br />
the guest house.<br />
40. Lack of control of residents will culminate in unacceptable noise disturbance.<br />
41. Such businesses, if they are experiencing under occupancy, will become<br />
increasingly reliant upon accepting bookings from referral sources i.e.<br />
Homeless Protocol Teams, <strong>Council</strong>/private Let evictions, custodial<br />
resettlement teams, mental health services etc.<br />
42. The majority of guest rooms will face onto side of 38 Hutton Avenue and the<br />
privacy once enjoyed by 38 Hutton Avenue will be lost.<br />
Copy Letters N<br />
The period for publicity has expired.<br />
Consultations<br />
9.11 The following consultation replies have been received:<br />
Head of Traffic and Transportation – No objection subject to conditions<br />
Head of Public Protection – No objections subject to conditions requiring sound<br />
insulation measures upon the party wall (if necessary), 24-hour management of the<br />
operation and that no function facilities will be created for non guests.<br />
4.1 Planning 25.02.09 Pl anning apps 50