07.01.2014 Views

PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council

PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council

PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Planning Committee – 25 th February 2009 4.1<br />

GEP2: States that provision will be required to enable access for all (in particular for<br />

people with disabilities, the elderly and people with children) in new developments<br />

where there is public access, places of employment, public transport and car parking<br />

schemes and where practical in alterarations to existing developments.<br />

GEP3: States that in considering applications, regard will be given to the need for the<br />

design and layout to incorporate measures to reduce crime and the fear of crime.<br />

GEP7: States that particularly high standards of design, landscaping and woodland<br />

planting to improve the visual environment will be required in respect of<br />

developments along this major corridor.<br />

Hsg12: States that proposals for residential institutions will be approved subject to<br />

considerations of amenity, accessibility to public transport, shopping and other<br />

community facilities and appropriate provision of parking and amenity space.<br />

Planning Considerations<br />

4.12 The main planning considerations in this instance are the appropriateness of<br />

the proposal in terms of the policies and proposals contained within the adopted<br />

<strong>Hartlepool</strong> Local Plan, the effect of the proposals upon neighbouring properties, on<br />

the streetscene in general, and highway implications.<br />

Local Plan<br />

4.13 The site is within the limits to development where the type of development<br />

proposed would be acceptable in principle.<br />

Residential Amenity<br />

4.14 Whilst the details submitted are purely for illustrative purposes they clearly<br />

show the difficulties of accommodating a development of this scale on this site.<br />

While the existing building is large it is clear that that proposed would be significantly<br />

larger and that issues of overlooking, dominance and poor outlook will be particularly<br />

relevant.<br />

4.15 The relationships with the houses at 5A Bolton Grove and 32 Station Lane are<br />

particularly tight. The illustrative details show the proposed home running virtually<br />

the full length of the site occupied by 5A Bolton Grove and a significant part of that<br />

occupied by 32 Station Lane, between 3 and 2 storeys high closer to the party<br />

boundaries than the existing building with a variety of windows, mainly bedroom<br />

windows facing both these properties. At its closest the new building will be only 3.3<br />

metres from the boundary and opposing windows will be as little as 8m apart.<br />

4.16 Although it is acknowledged that some of these windows are shown to be<br />

obscure glazed they are not shown fixed. There will therefore inevitably be a degree<br />

of overlooking and a perception of being overlooked. Further given the proximity and<br />

scale of the building to neighbours the new home will appear dominant and there will<br />

be a very poor outlook from both neighbours properties.<br />

4.1 Planning 25.02.09 Pl anning apps 26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!