07.01.2014 Views

PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council

PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council

PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.1<br />

10.20 The site lies within an area at high risk of flooding from tidal sources. The<br />

applicant has completed a Flood Risk assessment in support of the application which<br />

concludes that the finished floor levels should be set no lower than 4.885m AOD and<br />

advises that comprehensive flood warning and evacuation procedures will be agreed<br />

with the Local Planning Authority. It is considered that any flood risk issues could<br />

therefore be dealt with through appropriate conditions on site levels.<br />

DRAINAGE<br />

10.21 The existing system has failed on several occasions and consequently<br />

sewage has flooded parts of the Marina. Concerns have therefore rightly been raised<br />

in relation to the adequacy of the existing drainage system to accommodate the<br />

additional flows from the site. The information provided by the applicant has been<br />

examined by our Engineering Consultancy who have concluded that it appears that<br />

the system is barely adequate to cope with existing flows. The Engineering<br />

Consultancy have advised that they have serious reservations about the practical<br />

adequacy of the foul system but would wish to reserve final judgement until a CCTV<br />

survey is provided and examined. However the applicant has appealed on the<br />

grounds of non determination and in light of this the matter cannot be further<br />

progressed at this time. It is considered at this time however that the applicant has<br />

failed to demonstrate a satisfactory means of disposal for sewage/effluent. In<br />

determining the appeal the Inspector will need to take view on this matter.<br />

SEA WALL & LOCK<br />

10.22 Given the developments proximity to the sea wall and lock concerns have<br />

been raised in relation to the effect of the development on the foundations of the sea<br />

wall and in relation to access to these structures for maintenance.<br />

10.23 In relation to the impact on the sea wall the applicant has submitted structural<br />

calculations and these have been assessed by our Engineering Consultancy. They<br />

have responded that they have no objections to the proposal on the grounds of its<br />

potential impact on the sea wall subject to appropriate conditions requiring further<br />

investigations.<br />

10.24 In relation to the access to the sea wall lock the applicant has advised that a<br />

5.5m wide clear zone will be accommodated to allow for access to the sea wall and<br />

this is acceptable to our Engineering Consultancy. This requirement could be<br />

conditioned.<br />

10.25 In relation to access to the lock this is a matter for the operator of the Marina.<br />

10.26 In determining the appeal clearly the Inspector will need to take view on<br />

whether the proposal is acceptable in relation to these issues.<br />

HARBOUR/ BOAT LIFT ACCESS<br />

10.27 Concerns have been raised that the siting of the building will affect navigation<br />

of the dock. In particular it will obstruct a leading light located on, and visibility from,<br />

the Lock Masters Office. The applicant maintains that the building has been sited so<br />

W:\CSword\Democratic Ser vices\<strong>COMMITTEE</strong>S\<strong>PLANNING</strong> CTTEE\R eports \Reports - 2008 - 2009\09.02.25\Updat es\4.1 -<br />

Planni ng - 09. 02. 25 - 10 - RPS Slake Tce.DOC 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!