PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council
PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council
PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.1<br />
10.20 The site lies within an area at high risk of flooding from tidal sources. The<br />
applicant has completed a Flood Risk assessment in support of the application which<br />
concludes that the finished floor levels should be set no lower than 4.885m AOD and<br />
advises that comprehensive flood warning and evacuation procedures will be agreed<br />
with the Local Planning Authority. It is considered that any flood risk issues could<br />
therefore be dealt with through appropriate conditions on site levels.<br />
DRAINAGE<br />
10.21 The existing system has failed on several occasions and consequently<br />
sewage has flooded parts of the Marina. Concerns have therefore rightly been raised<br />
in relation to the adequacy of the existing drainage system to accommodate the<br />
additional flows from the site. The information provided by the applicant has been<br />
examined by our Engineering Consultancy who have concluded that it appears that<br />
the system is barely adequate to cope with existing flows. The Engineering<br />
Consultancy have advised that they have serious reservations about the practical<br />
adequacy of the foul system but would wish to reserve final judgement until a CCTV<br />
survey is provided and examined. However the applicant has appealed on the<br />
grounds of non determination and in light of this the matter cannot be further<br />
progressed at this time. It is considered at this time however that the applicant has<br />
failed to demonstrate a satisfactory means of disposal for sewage/effluent. In<br />
determining the appeal the Inspector will need to take view on this matter.<br />
SEA WALL & LOCK<br />
10.22 Given the developments proximity to the sea wall and lock concerns have<br />
been raised in relation to the effect of the development on the foundations of the sea<br />
wall and in relation to access to these structures for maintenance.<br />
10.23 In relation to the impact on the sea wall the applicant has submitted structural<br />
calculations and these have been assessed by our Engineering Consultancy. They<br />
have responded that they have no objections to the proposal on the grounds of its<br />
potential impact on the sea wall subject to appropriate conditions requiring further<br />
investigations.<br />
10.24 In relation to the access to the sea wall lock the applicant has advised that a<br />
5.5m wide clear zone will be accommodated to allow for access to the sea wall and<br />
this is acceptable to our Engineering Consultancy. This requirement could be<br />
conditioned.<br />
10.25 In relation to access to the lock this is a matter for the operator of the Marina.<br />
10.26 In determining the appeal clearly the Inspector will need to take view on<br />
whether the proposal is acceptable in relation to these issues.<br />
HARBOUR/ BOAT LIFT ACCESS<br />
10.27 Concerns have been raised that the siting of the building will affect navigation<br />
of the dock. In particular it will obstruct a leading light located on, and visibility from,<br />
the Lock Masters Office. The applicant maintains that the building has been sited so<br />
W:\CSword\Democratic Ser vices\<strong>COMMITTEE</strong>S\<strong>PLANNING</strong> CTTEE\R eports \Reports - 2008 - 2009\09.02.25\Updat es\4.1 -<br />
Planni ng - 09. 02. 25 - 10 - RPS Slake Tce.DOC 5