PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council
PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council
PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA - Hartlepool Borough Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
advised however that current government guidance contained in PPS23 advises a<br />
precautionary approach whereby any risks to controlled waters must be assessed<br />
and possible remediation explored before approval is granted. The Agency have<br />
therefore sustained their objection and an impasse has therefore been reached. In<br />
determining the appeal the Inspector will need to take view on this matter.<br />
PARKING/ACCESS<br />
4.1<br />
10.16 The application shows vehicular access accommodated from Middleton Road<br />
via the existing access to the rear of the adjacent premises on Navigation Point. It is<br />
apparent that this access which crosses an enclosed yard is the service access for<br />
the businesses on Navigation Point and serves the boat yard in this area. The<br />
access is also gated. There are several apparent problems with this arrangement.<br />
The access also serves the service area for the businesses on Navigation Point and<br />
the boatyard and there are potential safety issues if customers are also using the<br />
access with service vehicles manoeuvring. The access is also gated and it is<br />
understood that the gates are periodically closed. Notwithstanding the safety issues<br />
if the gates were left open to allow customer access this would potential leave the<br />
rear of the adjacent premises accessible and therefore vulnerable to crime if for<br />
example the restaurant was open at night. Conversely if the gates were closed the<br />
car parking areas would not be accessible via this route. Then final comments of<br />
Traffic & Transportation are awaited however it is considered that the proposed<br />
access arrangements need further consideration.<br />
10.17 Notwithstanding the concerns in relation to the proposed access arrangements<br />
outlined above. Traffic & Transportation and objectors have raised concerns in<br />
relation to the parking provision. The proposed layout plans show fifteen parking<br />
spaces accommodated within the site, however two of these spaces are located<br />
immediately on top of the others and are not therefore independently accessible.<br />
Traffic & Transportation have advised that the development would require 34 parking<br />
spaces, setting aside the two spaces which are not independently accessible this<br />
means that there is a shortfall of 21 spaces.<br />
10.18 Traffic & Transportation consider that the area is relatively poorly served by<br />
Public Transport with the nearest bus service operating 1 km from the site. The<br />
applicant has submitted a parking survey completed in connection with an earlier<br />
proposal which suggests that there is spare parking capacity in the existing main car<br />
parks at Navigation Point which the development could utilise. However Traffic &<br />
Transportation take the view that car park at Navigation Point is reaching, or is at, its<br />
capacity and that the development, the restaurant in particular, would exacerbate the<br />
existing parking problems and could result in inconsiderate parking to the detriment<br />
of highway safety.<br />
10.19 In conclusion, subject to the final comments of our Traffic & Transportation<br />
section, it is considered that the proposed parking and access arrangements are<br />
unacceptable.<br />
FLOODING<br />
W:\CSword\Democratic Ser vices\<strong>COMMITTEE</strong>S\<strong>PLANNING</strong> CTTEE\R eports \Reports - 2008 - 2009\09.02.25\Updat es\4.1 -<br />
Planni ng - 09. 02. 25 - 10 - RPS Slake Tce.DOC 4