05.01.2014 Views

volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality

volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality

volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Statement Concerning <strong>Halifax</strong> Water IRP – Tellus Institute Team<br />

and to establish clear priorities among them. Based on the information currently available, we<br />

suggest the following activities should be to priorities:<br />

1) implementation of the recently completed Asset Management Assessment Program<br />

roadmap;<br />

2) refinement and implementation of the I/I Reduction Pilot Program and overall Wet<br />

Weather System Planning; and<br />

3) an Institutional Capacity Assessment to identify the additional internal personnel and<br />

other resources HW requires to effectively oversee the implementation of these and the<br />

other proposed endeavors. Note that this activity has not been explicitly identified by<br />

HW in the initial IRP.<br />

To preserve options and ensure that major programmatic expenditures are consistent with a more<br />

comprehensive and more fully integrated IRP, actions taken over the next three years should<br />

reflect a “no regrets” standard or address unavoidable needs. “No regrets” initiatives are those<br />

that are appropriate regardless of the outcome of the additional studies to be undertaken.<br />

Unavoidable needs are programs and projects that are firm regulatory requirements or those that<br />

address system safety or integrity. In particular, over this period vigorous implementation of the<br />

Asset Management Assessment Program and the I/I Pilot Reduction Program will begin to fill<br />

the most critical data gaps, provide the detailed information required for implementation of an<br />

optimal asset renewal program, and inform a more comprehensive and robust IRP.<br />

We suggest the “no regrets” and unavoidable needs approach governs what happens until such<br />

time as the IRP is updated to reflect the outcomes of the priority studies. We recognize that this<br />

is a necessary but not sufficient basis for UARB decision-making on initiatives that entail<br />

expenditures before the IRP is updated, as the Board appropriately takes other factors into<br />

consideration as well.<br />

The Action Plan we propose should include a schedule for HW’s timely and thorough reporting<br />

on progress. Based on our involvement in the IRP process to date and the extensive planning<br />

needs summarized above, it will be important for the Board to track <strong>Halifax</strong> Water’s efforts<br />

closely as it begins to implement the activities identified. To ensure progress on the priority<br />

planning efforts, we suggest continuation of the collaboration and consultation process that has<br />

served well in developing this initial IRP.<br />

October 31 2012 Page 272 of 272<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!