volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality

volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality

05.01.2014 Views

Halifax Water Integrated Resource Plan Appendices to control only those 28 overflow locations that are expected to experience growth in their tributary sewersheds and only to a level sufficient to offset the effects of growth. Halifax Water has produced an evaluation of the environmental and public health risks associated with known overflow locations. It has categorized each location according to the categories presented in Table 2.9. Table 2.9 Risk Category A B C D E Receiving Water Risk Categories Risk Description Drinking water Supervised HRM beach or on-ground with high potential for human contact Known unsupervised swimming areas and designated recreational areas (boat clubs, parks etc.) Other freshwater bodies and/or ground with low potential for human contact Other marine bodies The average year overflow volumes associated with current conditions, future growth with no controls, and future growth under the RWWFP preferred scenario are summarized for the 28 overflows impacted by growth in Table 2.10. The Table also includes the 31 non-growth impacted overflow volumes for the same scenarios as well as differentiating. All overflow locations by risk level. Table 2.10 Average Year Overflow Volumes Category Receiving Water Risk Level Number of Outfalls Baseline (1000 m 3 /yr.) Growth No Controls (1000 m3/yr.) Preferred RWWFP (1000 m 3 /yr.) E 12 7,891 8,021 9,47 1 D 0 0 0 0 Non-Growth Outfalls (31) C 6 74 74 74 B 13 697 696 667 A 0 0 0 0 Total 31 1,560 1,572 1,688 E 15 6,772 10,935 5,449 RWWFP Growth Impacted Outfalls (28) D 4 46 355 43 C 5 935 4,895 646 B 4 29 51 28 A 0 0 0 0 Total 28 7,782 16,236 6,166 Total System Outfalls 59 9,342 17,808 7,854 Revision: 2012-10-29 Integrated Resource Plan –Appendices F-23 October 31 2012 Page 202 of 272

Halifax Water Integrated Resource Plan Appendices The results presented in Table 2.10 show that under current (baseline) conditions approximately 7.8 million m 3 /yr is discharged through the 28 outfalls addressed in the RWWFP with an additional 1.6 million m 3 /yr. discharged through the remaining 31 active overflows. It is noteworthy that 49% of the non-growth baseline volume is discharged to B or C risk level receiving waters while about 12% of the growth impacted volume is discharged to B and C risk level receiving waters. The impact of growth with no additional controls is evident with an over 100% increase in overflow volumes between the baseline and growth with no controls cases. The preferred RWWFP strategy however reduces the average annual overflow volume for the 28 outfalls by 16% for the total systems outfalls, thus already achieving a substantial improvement. It is for these reasons that an Enhanced Overflow Control Program was developed and is proposed for implementation through the IRP. A high level analysis of the Enhanced Overflow Control Program was carried out using the following assumptions: • Additional overflow control used a technology based on storage coupled to pumping and secondary treatment for purposes of estimating capital costs. • Storage was sized to capture all but 25, 15 and 5 overflow events per average year • Pumping and secondary treatment requirements were sized to empty full storage in 48 hours • Costs were estimated using the same procedures as throughout the IRP (documented in Volume 3 - Appendix C). The additional (beyond the RWWFP) capital costs to achieve a uniform level of 5, 15 and 25 overflow events for all risk levels of receiving water are presented in Figure 2.1. Revision: 2012-10-29 Integrated Resource Plan –Appendices F-24 October 31 2012 Page 203 of 272

<strong>Halifax</strong> Water Integrated Resource Plan<br />

Appendices<br />

to control only those 28 overflow locations that are expected to experience growth in their<br />

tributary sewersheds and only to a level sufficient to offset the effects of growth.<br />

<strong>Halifax</strong> Water has produced an evaluation of the environmental and public health risks<br />

associated with known overflow locations. It has categorized each location according to<br />

the categories presented in Table 2.9.<br />

Table 2.9<br />

Risk Category<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

Receiving Water Risk Categories<br />

Risk Description<br />

Drinking water<br />

Supervised HRM beach or on-ground with high potential for human contact<br />

Known unsupervised swimming areas and designated recreational areas (boat clubs, parks etc.)<br />

Other freshwater bodies and/or ground with low potential for human contact<br />

Other marine bodies<br />

The average year overflow <strong>volume</strong>s associated with current conditions, future growth<br />

with no controls, and future growth under the RWWFP preferred scenario are<br />

summarized for the 28 overflows impacted by growth in Table 2.10. The Table also<br />

includes the 31 non-growth impacted overflow <strong>volume</strong>s for the same scenarios as well<br />

as differentiating. All overflow locations by risk level.<br />

Table 2.10<br />

Average Year Overflow Volumes<br />

Category<br />

Receiving<br />

Water Risk<br />

Level<br />

Number of<br />

Outfalls<br />

Baseline<br />

(1000 m 3 /yr.)<br />

Growth No<br />

Controls<br />

(1000 m3/yr.)<br />

Preferred<br />

RWWFP<br />

(1000 m 3 /yr.)<br />

E 12 7,891 8,021 9,47 1<br />

D 0 0 0 0<br />

Non-Growth<br />

Outfalls (31)<br />

C 6 74 74 74<br />

B 13 697 696 667<br />

A 0 0 0 0<br />

Total 31 1,560 1,572 1,688<br />

E 15 6,772 10,935 5,449<br />

RWWFP<br />

Growth<br />

Impacted<br />

Outfalls (28)<br />

D 4 46 355 43<br />

C 5 935 4,895 646<br />

B 4 29 51 28<br />

A 0 0 0 0<br />

Total 28 7,782 16,236 6,166<br />

Total System Outfalls 59 9,342 17,808 7,854<br />

Revision: 2012-10-29 Integrated Resource Plan –Appendices F-23<br />

October 31 2012 Page 202 of 272

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!