volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality

volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality

05.01.2014 Views

Halifax Water Integrated Resource Plan Recommended IRP and Analysis Figure 6.5 Dartmouth WWTF Demand Reduction In order to assess the potential benefit to cost relationship associated with the demand reduction activity the following assumptions were made: • The bulk of the cost of the 30% future water/wastewater demand reduction would be incorporated into the cost of the new dwellings and buildings (through low-flow appliances and fixtures) and would not impact on the IRP capital requirements. • The cost of the demand reduction for existing water/wastewater usage would be small and would be largely achieved through existing public education programs The cost of the I/I program could not be determined precisely due to the absence of Halifax data. Instead a high-level analysis approach was based on the large scale, well resourced, multi-year program in King County, Washington. The King County program examined a wide range of on-lot and public system measures to achieve flow reductions. The overall goal of the program was a reduction equivalent to 30% of existing I/I rates. The program considered numerous major expansions of wastewater collection, conveyance and treatment facilities. An analysis of the King County costing data for I/I reduction projects was carried out for the IRP and is presented in Figure 6.6. The costs were indexed from 2005 to 2012 using the ENRCCI. The costs include a construction cost multiplier accounting for engineering and contingencies among other factors. Revision: 2012-10-29 Integrated Resource Plan 83 October 31 2012 Page 116 of 272

Halifax Water Integrated Resource Plan Recommended IRP and Analysis Figure 6.6 King County I/I Reduction Costs The capital and operating cost reduction with both water demand and I/I reduction is about a NPV of $21.2 million to 2043. Using I/I reduction alone corresponds to about $10 million NPV in cost reduction by 2043. The flow reduction of 30% in the existing I/I flow would cost about $8.4 million using King County data. This would provide a potential savings in NPV of $1.6 million ($10 million in savings - $8.4 million I/I program cost) for a future I/I reduction program. This of course must be tempered with the recognition that local conditions and costs may prove to be very different than King County and highlights the need for a comprehensive Halifax I/I program. The case study findings support the importance of including a robust treatment of demand reduction strategies in regional wastewater planning, including the proposed Wet Weather System Plan and Wastewater Master Plan. The results of such analysis may significantly impact the Recommended IRP and should be incorporated when the IRP is updated. Through a more comprehensive demand reduction analysis, Halifax Water will be able to assess the effectiveness and affordability of a range of demand reduction solutions for the wastewater system that may include additional system storage, sewer separation, sewer twinning, installation of deep storm sewers, and a range of solutions on the private portion of the network. The formal wet weather planning and I/I reduction pilot programs proposed in the current IRP will build on the preliminary Revision: 2012-10-29 Integrated Resource Plan 84 October 31 2012 Page 117 of 272

<strong>Halifax</strong> Water Integrated Resource Plan<br />

Recommended IRP and Analysis<br />

Figure 6.5<br />

Dartmouth WWTF Demand Reduction<br />

In order to assess the potential benefit to cost relationship associated with the demand<br />

reduction activity the following assumptions were made:<br />

• The bulk of the cost of the 30% future water/wastewater demand reduction would<br />

be incorporated into the cost of the new dwellings and buildings (through low-flow<br />

appliances and fixtures) and would not impact on the IRP capital requirements.<br />

• The cost of the demand reduction for existing water/wastewater usage would be<br />

small and would be largely achieved through existing public education programs<br />

The cost of the I/I program could not be determined precisely due to the absence of<br />

<strong>Halifax</strong> data. Instead a high-level analysis approach was based on the large scale,<br />

well resourced, multi-year program in King County, Washington.<br />

The King County program examined a wide range of on-lot and public system measures<br />

to achieve flow reductions. The overall goal of the program was a reduction equivalent<br />

to 30% of existing I/I rates. The program considered numerous major expansions of<br />

wastewater collection, conveyance and treatment facilities. An analysis of the King<br />

County costing data for I/I reduction projects was carried out for the IRP and is<br />

presented in Figure 6.6. The costs were indexed from 2005 to 2012 using the ENRCCI.<br />

The costs include a construction cost multiplier accounting for engineering and<br />

contingencies among other factors.<br />

Revision: 2012-10-29 Integrated Resource Plan 83<br />

October 31 2012 Page 116 of 272

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!