Guidelines for the Preparation of Transportation Impact Studies - 8th ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

6.1.4 Supplementary surveys or analyses may be needed to assess saturation flows, gap availability, projected queue lengths and possible blocking queues. In the case of congested intersections, particularly where the existing volume/capacity ratio is greater than 1.0, it is advisable to conduct further field observations of intersection operations, saturation flows, queues, and delays to confirm and/or rationalize the results of the performance analysis (see also 4.2.1). 6.1.5 Identify intersections and individual traffic movements where: • the overall volume/capacity ratio of an intersection exceeds 0.85; • the volume/capacity ratio of an individual through movement or shared through/turning movement exceeds 0.85; • the volume/capacity ratio of an exclusive turning movement exceeds 1.0; • an exclusive turning movement generates queues which exceed the available turning lane storage space, or, • average delay for any particular movement exceeds what is typically acceptable. 1 Intersections/movements meeting one or more of the above criteria and the associated performance results for the various time periods and scenarios being evaluated should be summarized in a table. 6.1.6 Identify other safety or operational issues, such as those associated with merging, weaving, sight-distance, etc. 6.1.7 Document, in an appendix to the TIS, the results of all performance analyses, volume/capacity ratios for each intersection and for individual traffic movements. 6.2 Evaluation of Impacts of Site Generated Transit Demand 6.2.1 Prepare an evaluation of the impacts of site-generated transit demand for the relevant time periods and scenarios on all transit services and transit stops and terminals where 1 What is an acceptable amount of delay to drivers or pedestrians varies according to the situation being examined. Drivers waiting on private driveways will accept longer delays than the same drivers waiting on side streets, and drivers waiting on major streets expect lower delays than on side streets. The more urbanized and/or congested an area the longer drivers will wait. What is needed is consideration of what drivers might accept before starting to take more dangerous actions, such as turning out into shorter-than-usual inter-vehicle gaps. HRM does not explicitly consider the calculated “level-of-service” results because any one particular delay range is not representative of various situations. Another aspect is the analysis/calculation procedure allows an analyst to manipulate the inputs to achieve so-called “good level-of-service” on a problem movement at the expense of overall excessively poor performance. TISGUIDE8.WPD September 1, 2007 page 18
idership/usage will be increased 5 per cent or more by site-generated transit demand. As discussed in 4.3.1, the situation will determine whether it is most useful to evaluate peak-point ridership or ridership in the vicinity of the development proposal. The analysis should include an assessment of the need for changes to existing service frequencies, the need for new or revised transit routes, and the adequacy of existing transit terminals for: • existing transit ridership; • existing ridership adjusted to account for background changes; and, • existing ridership adjusted for background changes and including site-generated transit demand after accounting for the impacts of the proposed TDM Plan. 6.2.2 Provide an assessment of the potential for effects on transit operations caused by site-generated traffic movements or queues. 6.3 Identification of Transportation System Changes Required to Mitigate the Impacts of the Proposed Development The elements of the TIS associated with identifying transportation system changes required to mitigate the impacts of traffic or transit demand generated by the development or redevelopment proposal are outlined in this section. In assessing the need for transportation changes to be provided, in conjunction with the development or redevelopment proposal, all reasonable attempts should be made to identify transportation or other changes that mitigate the transportation impacts of the development or redevelopment proposal such that: • site generated traffic does not cause any intersections or individual traffic movements to meet or exceed the criteria in 6.1.5; • intersections or individual traffic movements where the performance met or exceeded the criteria in 6.1.5 before the addition of site-generated traffic are not worsened by this addition; • adequate storage is provided in exclusive turning lanes to accommodate projected traffic, including site-generated traffic; • pedestrian and cycling needs are safely accommodated; • traffic operating and safety conditions are maintained or improved; • the capacity of transit services or facilities is sufficient to accommodate site-generated transit demand; and, • site-generated traffic will not have an unmanageable adverse effect on transit operations. Transportation system changes proposed in conjunction with the development or redevelopment proposal must be compatible with other elements of the transportation system and must be warranted, safe, and contribute to more effective and efficient movement of people and goods. Generally, the proponent of a development or TISGUIDE8.WPD September 1, 2007 page 19
Page 1 and 2: Guidelines for the Preparation of T
Page 3 and 4: Halifax Regional Municipality Guide
Page 5 and 6: FOREWORD A transportation impact st
Page 7 and 8: 1.0 Introduction: Transportation, D
Page 9 and 10: 2.0 General TIS Requirements In thi
Page 11 and 12: 3.0 Description of the Development
Page 13 and 14: • on-street parking spaces and pa
Page 15 and 16: or appears to be inconsistent, perh
Page 17 and 18: 5.0 Estimation of Travel that will
Page 19 and 20: • other factors that may be expec
Page 21: 6.0 Evaluation of Transportation Im
Page 25 and 26: to assess effects on pedestrian cro
Page 27 and 28: 7.0.5 Evaluate the potential for ac
Page 29 and 30: APPENDIX A Transportation Impact St
Page 31 and 32: Supplementary Information for the T
Page 33 and 34: Existing Traffic: Halifax Regional
Page 35 and 36: All other inputs should be based on

Guidelines for the Preparation of Transportation Impact Studies - 8th ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?