The Eternal Triangle of Growth, Inequality and Poverty Reduction
The Eternal Triangle of Growth, Inequality and Poverty Reduction
The Eternal Triangle of Growth, Inequality and Poverty Reduction
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Elasticity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>Reduction</strong> w.r.t. <strong>Growth</strong><br />
<strong>Growth</strong><br />
Increases in<br />
Mean Income Level<br />
Trade-<strong>of</strong>f ?<br />
Development Governance<br />
Institutions<br />
(common factors?)<br />
<strong>Inequality</strong><br />
Distribution <strong>of</strong> Income<br />
Distribution <strong>of</strong> Assets<br />
Elasticity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>Reduction</strong> 'Pro-Poor' Elasticity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>Reduction</strong><br />
w.r.t. <strong>Growth</strong><br />
w.r.t. Distribution<br />
<strong>Poverty</strong><br />
<strong>Reduction</strong> in<br />
Absolute <strong>Poverty</strong><br />
<strong>Poverty</strong> Rate (headcouunt) <strong>Poverty</strong> Gap Squared <strong>Poverty</strong> Gap<br />
Ravallion <strong>and</strong> Chen (1996) 1987-1994 42 -2.6 (half <strong>of</strong> mean income)<br />
-3.1 (1$PPP a day) -3.7<br />
Bruno, Ravallion, <strong>and</strong> Squire (1996 1984-1993 20 -2.12 (1$PPP a day) -3.46<br />
India 40years 33 HS -1.33 (Indian poverty line) -2.26<br />
Adams (2003) 1980-1999 50 cos. 101 obs. -2.6 (1$PPP a day) -3 -3.4<br />
This indicate that the gains are not confined to those near the poverty line.<br />
(Bruno, Ravallion, <strong>and</strong> Squire,1996, p.10).<br />
15<br />
Figure 4 : <strong>Growth</strong> is good for the poor<br />
Source: Dollar <strong>and</strong> Kraay (2007), Figure 1<br />
16<br />
8