Report
Report
Report
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
6 Impact of SAFTA on Member<br />
Countries: General Equilibrium Analysis<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
To assess the economic-wide impact of various SAFTA<br />
scenarios on the member countries the study uses a CGE<br />
model. The latest GTAP Version 6.02 (limited release)<br />
version has been used for this purpose. The advantage<br />
of using this version is that it includes Pakistan, the<br />
second largest economy in the region, as a separate<br />
entity. In the earlier Version 6.00 Pakistan was clubbed<br />
with the Rest of South Asia (with ABMN), and<br />
hence results could not be discretely attributed to<br />
Pakistan.<br />
ABMN are counted as one aggregation in the<br />
present GTAP model, and labeled as ABMN. Bangladesh,<br />
India and Sri Lanka are the other separate entities<br />
that have been taken in the aggregation. In order to get<br />
as disaggregated sector level results as possible, no<br />
sectoral level aggregations were created in the prepared<br />
database.<br />
The following steps have been undertaken to<br />
estimate the economy-wide impact of various scenarios<br />
of SAFTA on the member countries.<br />
1. SAFTA implementation takes place as per applied<br />
MFN tariffs subsisting on 1 January 2006. The<br />
implementation commenced on 1 July 2006. The<br />
GTAP simulations must take a base that reflects<br />
this position. In this case the GTAP database was<br />
updated till 2005 (based on tariff changes obtained<br />
from TRAINS). The database was also subjected<br />
to shocks to take incorporate the significant grant<br />
of concessions by India to Sri Lanka under the Indo<br />
Lanka FTA. Since the GTAP base database was of<br />
2001, it was assumed that all other concessions<br />
(since they pre-dated 2001) were taken into account<br />
in the base equilibrium of the model.<br />
2. This equilibrium was shocked to take into account<br />
what may be described as the 1st phase of SAFTA<br />
implementation<br />
• Reduction of tariffs by developing countries to<br />
20% by 2008<br />
• Reduction of tariffs by LDCs to 30%<br />
• Reduction of tariffs of developing countries visà-vis<br />
imports from SAARC LDCs to 0–5% by<br />
2009<br />
• Reductions in three categories above (a, b & c)<br />
all subject to the sensitive lists.<br />
• The results provide an updated database that<br />
simulates the equilibrium of 2008–09.<br />
3. The 2008–09 base was then shocked completely<br />
to equate a 2013–16 situation where all SAFTA<br />
duties are brought to zero. A best case scenario of<br />
complete elimination of sensitive lists is also<br />
assumed in this shock.<br />
IMPACT OF SAFTA<br />
The GTAP model provides sophisticated analysis of<br />
possible direct effects of SAFTA including various feedback<br />
effects across several sectors and countries. The<br />
modeling results offer valuable quantitative information.<br />
The fact that some of the policy scenarios have<br />
already been set (and in fact implementation of them<br />
has already commenced), adds to the greater precision<br />
with which the GTAP model can be used as a predictive<br />
tool. A word of caution is required in interpreting the<br />
results of the model. Given the various limitations of<br />
this technique, the results of the model should be taken<br />
only as indicative about the direction of the impact.<br />
More importantly, the results with respect to welfare<br />
gained should be interpreted in terms of marginal gains<br />
or losses as the term ‘welfare’ itself is ambiguous.<br />
The simulations indicate that welfare effects of<br />
SAFTA will be high for countries like India and<br />
Bangladesh while Pakistan and Sri Lanka will only gain<br />
marginally in terms of welfare. There is an indication<br />
of welfare loss for the rest of the world with SAFTA<br />
progressing (Table 6.1).