Report
Report
Report
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
COMPETITIVENESS AND COMPLEMENTARITIES 33<br />
while Sri lanka has become more competitive in sacks<br />
and bags, cork products, transformers and resistors,<br />
etc.<br />
A list of products where all four countries are<br />
competitive, i.e. RCA>1 is presented in Table 3.2<br />
(Appendix III). Textile products are still the products<br />
where all four major trading partners of the region compete<br />
in the third country market. However, these countries<br />
have also gained competitiveness in products like<br />
shrimps, spices, woven carpets, cotton yarn wastes, etc.<br />
The competitiveness analysis therefore indicates<br />
that the potential for intra-regional trade has increased<br />
substantially in 2004 as compared to a decade back.<br />
Countries have gained competitiveness in different<br />
products and at a more disaggregated level, the products<br />
which can be exported within the region by the four<br />
major trading partners have increased substantially in<br />
number. However, whether the competitive edge of a<br />
country leads to higher exports within the region also<br />
depends on whether other countries in the region import<br />
these products or not? The next section examines the<br />
complementarities within the region.<br />
INTRA-REGIONAL COMPLEMENTARITIES<br />
For intra-regional trade to expand it is important that<br />
the trade profiles of the countries match, i.e., what is<br />
exported by one country should be imported by the<br />
region as a whole. It is therefore important to examine<br />
whether the countries’ export and import profiles<br />
within the region have become similar over time and,<br />
therefore, facilitate growth in intra-regional trade or<br />
not. The estimated ‘trade complementarity index’ (TCI)<br />
shows how well the export profile of one country, or<br />
group of countries, matches the import profiles of<br />
others (Yeats and Ng 2003). Furthermore, changes in<br />
the index over time can help determine whether their<br />
trade profiles are becoming more, or less, compatible.<br />
We estimate the complementarity index between<br />
South Asian countries with SAARC as a region. The<br />
index of trade complementarity between two countries<br />
k and j (C kj<br />
) is defined as,<br />
C ikj<br />
= 1 – Σ (|M ik<br />
– X ij<br />
| ÷ 2) (1)<br />
C ijk<br />
= 1– Σ (|M ij<br />
– X ik<br />
| ÷ 2) (2)<br />
where k is a SAARC country, j is the SAARC region,<br />
and i represents product category. This index takes the<br />
value of one when a composition of import needs in an<br />
importing country matches perfectly with the export<br />
bundle of the region. At the other extreme, where an<br />
export bundle of an exporting country has no relevance<br />
to the import needs of the region, the index takes the<br />
value of zero. As such, it is assumed that higher the<br />
index value more favourable is the prospect for a<br />
successful trade arrangement in the region.<br />
Michaely (1994) used the index to assess prospects<br />
for Latin American trade arrangements, while Yeats<br />
(1998) employed the measure to analyse the compatibility<br />
of Sub-Saharan African countries’ intra-regional<br />
trade. For SAARC region the trade complementarity<br />
index has been estimated by Nag and Nandi (2003)<br />
for the years 1997 to 2001. They find that there is a<br />
significant rise in TCI of India during this period for<br />
SAARC countries. But find rising TCI for Pakistan and<br />
Sri Lanka in the SAARC region.<br />
We estimate the TCI taking averages of the years<br />
1991–93 and 2002–04 (Table 3.4). The indices are<br />
computed based on the United Nations/COMTRADE<br />
bilateral trade flow data at the SITC (Rev 3) five-digit<br />
level.<br />
The TCI for the two time periods indicate that,<br />
except for Pakistan, complementarities of Bangladesh,<br />
India and Sri Lanka vis-à-vis SAARC region as a whole<br />
has increased overtime. The TCI in terms of exports of<br />
India and Sri Lanka to SAARC region has almost<br />
doubled in this time period ( from 0.05 to 0.1 and from<br />
0.21–0.50) while TCI in terms of exports of SAARC<br />
region to countries has also increased overtime. This<br />
strongly indicates that there exist possibilities of intraregional<br />
trade expansion.<br />
Trade complementarity index has been further<br />
estimated for total trade for each country for the two<br />
time periods (Table 3.5). The results show that TCI for<br />
total trade has also improved drastically for Bangladesh,<br />
Table 3.4 Complementarity Index – Export and Import<br />
Country 1991(Avg Yr 1991–93) 2004 (Avg Yr 2002–04)<br />
SAARC Bangladesh India Pakistan Sri Lanka SAARC Bangladesh India Pakistan Sri Lanka<br />
SARRC 0.05 0.22 0.25 0.08 0.06 0.31 0.10 0.12<br />
Bangladesh 0.17 0.27<br />
India 0.05 0.10<br />
Pakistan 0.38 0.24<br />
Sri Lanka 0.21 0.50