04.01.2014 Views

Report

Report

Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COMPETITIVENESS AND COMPLEMENTARITIES 33<br />

while Sri lanka has become more competitive in sacks<br />

and bags, cork products, transformers and resistors,<br />

etc.<br />

A list of products where all four countries are<br />

competitive, i.e. RCA>1 is presented in Table 3.2<br />

(Appendix III). Textile products are still the products<br />

where all four major trading partners of the region compete<br />

in the third country market. However, these countries<br />

have also gained competitiveness in products like<br />

shrimps, spices, woven carpets, cotton yarn wastes, etc.<br />

The competitiveness analysis therefore indicates<br />

that the potential for intra-regional trade has increased<br />

substantially in 2004 as compared to a decade back.<br />

Countries have gained competitiveness in different<br />

products and at a more disaggregated level, the products<br />

which can be exported within the region by the four<br />

major trading partners have increased substantially in<br />

number. However, whether the competitive edge of a<br />

country leads to higher exports within the region also<br />

depends on whether other countries in the region import<br />

these products or not? The next section examines the<br />

complementarities within the region.<br />

INTRA-REGIONAL COMPLEMENTARITIES<br />

For intra-regional trade to expand it is important that<br />

the trade profiles of the countries match, i.e., what is<br />

exported by one country should be imported by the<br />

region as a whole. It is therefore important to examine<br />

whether the countries’ export and import profiles<br />

within the region have become similar over time and,<br />

therefore, facilitate growth in intra-regional trade or<br />

not. The estimated ‘trade complementarity index’ (TCI)<br />

shows how well the export profile of one country, or<br />

group of countries, matches the import profiles of<br />

others (Yeats and Ng 2003). Furthermore, changes in<br />

the index over time can help determine whether their<br />

trade profiles are becoming more, or less, compatible.<br />

We estimate the complementarity index between<br />

South Asian countries with SAARC as a region. The<br />

index of trade complementarity between two countries<br />

k and j (C kj<br />

) is defined as,<br />

C ikj<br />

= 1 – Σ (|M ik<br />

– X ij<br />

| ÷ 2) (1)<br />

C ijk<br />

= 1– Σ (|M ij<br />

– X ik<br />

| ÷ 2) (2)<br />

where k is a SAARC country, j is the SAARC region,<br />

and i represents product category. This index takes the<br />

value of one when a composition of import needs in an<br />

importing country matches perfectly with the export<br />

bundle of the region. At the other extreme, where an<br />

export bundle of an exporting country has no relevance<br />

to the import needs of the region, the index takes the<br />

value of zero. As such, it is assumed that higher the<br />

index value more favourable is the prospect for a<br />

successful trade arrangement in the region.<br />

Michaely (1994) used the index to assess prospects<br />

for Latin American trade arrangements, while Yeats<br />

(1998) employed the measure to analyse the compatibility<br />

of Sub-Saharan African countries’ intra-regional<br />

trade. For SAARC region the trade complementarity<br />

index has been estimated by Nag and Nandi (2003)<br />

for the years 1997 to 2001. They find that there is a<br />

significant rise in TCI of India during this period for<br />

SAARC countries. But find rising TCI for Pakistan and<br />

Sri Lanka in the SAARC region.<br />

We estimate the TCI taking averages of the years<br />

1991–93 and 2002–04 (Table 3.4). The indices are<br />

computed based on the United Nations/COMTRADE<br />

bilateral trade flow data at the SITC (Rev 3) five-digit<br />

level.<br />

The TCI for the two time periods indicate that,<br />

except for Pakistan, complementarities of Bangladesh,<br />

India and Sri Lanka vis-à-vis SAARC region as a whole<br />

has increased overtime. The TCI in terms of exports of<br />

India and Sri Lanka to SAARC region has almost<br />

doubled in this time period ( from 0.05 to 0.1 and from<br />

0.21–0.50) while TCI in terms of exports of SAARC<br />

region to countries has also increased overtime. This<br />

strongly indicates that there exist possibilities of intraregional<br />

trade expansion.<br />

Trade complementarity index has been further<br />

estimated for total trade for each country for the two<br />

time periods (Table 3.5). The results show that TCI for<br />

total trade has also improved drastically for Bangladesh,<br />

Table 3.4 Complementarity Index – Export and Import<br />

Country 1991(Avg Yr 1991–93) 2004 (Avg Yr 2002–04)<br />

SAARC Bangladesh India Pakistan Sri Lanka SAARC Bangladesh India Pakistan Sri Lanka<br />

SARRC 0.05 0.22 0.25 0.08 0.06 0.31 0.10 0.12<br />

Bangladesh 0.17 0.27<br />

India 0.05 0.10<br />

Pakistan 0.38 0.24<br />

Sri Lanka 0.21 0.50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!