04.01.2014 Views

Report

Report

Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

162 QUANTIFICATION OF BENEFITS FROM ECONOMIC COOPERATION IN SOUTH ASIA<br />

• However with regard to nursing and dental, there<br />

is no information on whether other SAARC countries<br />

have recognised degrees from each other.<br />

• There are no explicit requirements for citizenship<br />

or residency to register with the relevant authorities<br />

for practicing the profession of medicine or<br />

dentistry in the relevant SAARC member.<br />

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

Overview<br />

The inclusion of services within the SAFTA framework<br />

presents several challenges and opportunities for the<br />

SAARC countries. Such an inclusion holds potential<br />

not just for ensuring greater intra-SAARC trade, but<br />

also holds the potential of raising the levels of<br />

competitiveness in the South Asian region as a whole.<br />

It has been estimated that the availability of services<br />

(especially tourism, health, education, and labour)<br />

within the SAARC region will help to attract consumers<br />

from other parts of the world, and that an advanced<br />

services infrastructure within the region will boost the<br />

regions’ share in global services trade. 60 For facilitating<br />

this, several developments to liberalise both within each<br />

country, and at the regional level, will be necessary.<br />

With respect to health services, as already discussed,<br />

there are very few regulatory constraints in the SAARC<br />

countries in respect of investments in the health sector.<br />

The regulatory framework in each country is also<br />

conducive to arrangements for recognition of foreign<br />

medical and dental qualifications. There are no<br />

regulatory constraints on movement of patients from<br />

one country to another for treatment. However, there<br />

are several other issues pertaining to supply of services<br />

under each mode, which need to be addressed as part<br />

of the negotiations. These are summarised below.<br />

Recommendation 1: Investment Related<br />

Aspects Affecting Health Services, i.e.<br />

Mode 3 Service Delivery<br />

• Address upgrading commitments to autonomous<br />

levels: One of the aspects that comes out from the<br />

discussions in this chapter is that while none of the<br />

SAARC countries have committed Mode 3 in<br />

‘hospital services’ as an area for complete liberalisation<br />

under the GATS framework, each of the<br />

countries has achieved significant autonomous<br />

liberalisation in this Mode, and there are practically<br />

no regulatory impediments to Mode 3 in the<br />

regulatory framework of these countries. Only<br />

Maldives and Bhutan require specific government<br />

approval for joint ventures in the hospital<br />

sector. In all the other countries, 100% FDI is<br />

allowed.<br />

As part of the SAARC negotiations, the upgrading<br />

of the GATS commitments to the autonomous<br />

levels achieved in the member countries, should,<br />

therefore, be an aspect for discussion.<br />

• Address Investment-related operational constraints<br />

at national and regional levels: Operational<br />

constraints to investment need to be dealt with at<br />

the national level as a matter of legal and<br />

institutional reform. While this process needs to<br />

be undertaken at both the national and regional<br />

levels, investment related provisions investment<br />

related provisions under SAFTA could provide<br />

certain obligatory provisions offering special<br />

protection for foreign investors.<br />

• Constitution of a working group to address FDI<br />

related barriers: The SAFTA currently does not<br />

envisage a chapter on Investment. It however mandates<br />

the SAFTA members to consider removing<br />

barriers to intra-SAARC investments. 61 Constraints<br />

to FDI as identified above could therefore be studied<br />

and attempt to be addressed under a joint working<br />

group of the SAARC members.<br />

Recommendation 2: MRAs for Recognition<br />

of Medical and Dental Degrees between<br />

SAARC Members<br />

There are a number of similarities in the regulatory<br />

frameworks for recognition of qualifications and<br />

licensing of professionals in medicine, dentistry and<br />

nursing. Reciprocal arrangements for recognition of<br />

medical degrees exist among India, Bangladesh, Sri<br />

Lanka, Nepal and Pakistan. With respect to Maldives<br />

and Bhutan, these countries seem to recognise medical<br />

degrees at least from India and Sri Lanka. Internship<br />

and other work experience requirements for<br />

qualification are also similar in all the countries. There<br />

are no constraints in terms of citizenship and residency<br />

requirements in the regulatory framework.<br />

60<br />

See, Shivraj Bhatt, “Services under SAFTA: How to make it work for South Asia?” Nepalnews.com, September 6, 2006,<br />

available at http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=5780<br />

61<br />

Article 8, Agreement on SAFTA.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!