Report
Report
Report
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
xiv<br />
QUANTIFICATION OF BENEFITS FROM ECONOMIC COOPERATION IN SOUTH ASIA<br />
of SAFTA implementation, i.e as on 1 January 2006. 5<br />
The GTAP database was updated till 2005 based on<br />
tariff changes obtained from trade analysis and<br />
information systems (TRAINS). The database was also<br />
subjected to shocks to incorporate the significant grant<br />
of concessions by India to Sri Lanka under the Indo-<br />
Lanka FTA.<br />
This equilibrium was shocked to take into account<br />
what may be described as Phase I of SAFTA implementation,<br />
which includes:<br />
• Reduction of tariffs by developing countries to 20%<br />
by 2008<br />
• Reduction of tariffs by LDCs to 30%<br />
• Reduction of tariffs of developing countries vis-àvis<br />
imports from SAARC<br />
• LDCs to 0–5% by 2009<br />
• Reductions in first three categories above, subject<br />
to the sensitive lists.<br />
The results provide an updated database that<br />
simulates the equilibrium of 2008–09. The 2008–09<br />
base was then shocked completely to equate a 2013–<br />
16 situation where all SAFTA duties are brought to 0.<br />
A best case scenario of complete elimination of sensitive<br />
lists is also assumed in this shock, i.e. Phase II of SAFTA.<br />
The study makes two key assumptions. First, all<br />
members will fully comply with their tariff reduction<br />
obligations that they agreed to in the SAFTA document.<br />
Second, all countries will fully liberalise their sensitive<br />
lists over the next nine years. The study also assumed<br />
that Afghanistan will have the status of a full member<br />
of SAARC in the near future.<br />
Using the general equilibrium analysis, the impact<br />
of SAFTA on production, employment, trade and<br />
welfare for each member country has been estimated.<br />
Afghanistan, Bhutan, Maldives and Nepal<br />
Though the ABMN group gets zero duty access to the<br />
developing countries by 2009 itself, its gains are limited<br />
on account of their inability to access agricultural<br />
products markets, which are blocked by the sensitive<br />
lists of the developing countries.<br />
There are gains in primary commodities with<br />
complete liberalisation in 2016. With the removal of<br />
sensitive lists in a full liberalisation scenario, ABMN<br />
Table 2 Impact of SAFTA on ABMN Gains (per cent)<br />
Output Effect on Exports Global Global<br />
Unskilled to Exports Imports<br />
Employ- South<br />
ment Asia<br />
2008-09 0.03 –0.0004 20.82 0.74 1.96<br />
2016 0.26 0.0002 60.32 7.89 11.99<br />
see good export growth in agriculture products and<br />
primary commodities (Table 2). Given that the<br />
agriculture and forestry sector in ABMN accounts for<br />
over 50% of domestic output, and given that these<br />
sectors are employment intensive, a full SAFTA is<br />
beneficial to ABMN. However, the manufacturing<br />
sectors in ABMN are by and large incompetitive, and<br />
hence suffer output and employment losses.<br />
Bangladesh<br />
Bangladesh’s welfare gains are one of the highest in<br />
South Asia. This may be attributed to the complete<br />
liberalisation of high MFN tariffs, which generates<br />
consumptive benefit for both the user industries as well<br />
as household consumers. Bangladesh has also seen an<br />
increase in global exports by a significant 4.31% on<br />
account SAFTA. Export gains for Bangladesh in SAFTA<br />
markets in Phase I of liberalisation (2008–09) are<br />
significant, but not as high as the peak export growths<br />
to SAFTA seen by other countries (Table 3).<br />
Table 3 Export Gains for Bangladesh in SAFTA<br />
Market (per cent)<br />
Output Effect on Exports Global Global<br />
Unskilled to Exports Imports<br />
Employ- South<br />
ment Asia<br />
2008-09 –0.01 0.0001 38.08 0.19 0.27<br />
2016 –0.03 0.0001 14.43 4.31 5.47<br />
The lack of strong growth may be attributed to<br />
India’s sensitive list, but it is in fact seen in the full<br />
liberalisation scenario (where all countries liberalise<br />
tariffs even on sensitive list items), Bangladesh does<br />
not make any significant regional export gains despite<br />
liberalisation of sensitive list items including garments.<br />
However, the most interesting result is that its global<br />
exports has seen a significant 5% rise in the second<br />
phase. Most of this growth is to regions outside South<br />
Asia.<br />
negative list for LDCs impedes EAMA in several garments products, which actually do form the bulk of Bangladesh’s global<br />
exports. The concessions which Pakistan and Maldives receive in the Indian market vis-à-vis each of their global exports is<br />
higher at 57% and 60% respectively.<br />
5<br />
The implementation of SAFTA commenced on 1 July 2006.