04.01.2014 Views

Report

Report

Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

xiv<br />

QUANTIFICATION OF BENEFITS FROM ECONOMIC COOPERATION IN SOUTH ASIA<br />

of SAFTA implementation, i.e as on 1 January 2006. 5<br />

The GTAP database was updated till 2005 based on<br />

tariff changes obtained from trade analysis and<br />

information systems (TRAINS). The database was also<br />

subjected to shocks to incorporate the significant grant<br />

of concessions by India to Sri Lanka under the Indo-<br />

Lanka FTA.<br />

This equilibrium was shocked to take into account<br />

what may be described as Phase I of SAFTA implementation,<br />

which includes:<br />

• Reduction of tariffs by developing countries to 20%<br />

by 2008<br />

• Reduction of tariffs by LDCs to 30%<br />

• Reduction of tariffs of developing countries vis-àvis<br />

imports from SAARC<br />

• LDCs to 0–5% by 2009<br />

• Reductions in first three categories above, subject<br />

to the sensitive lists.<br />

The results provide an updated database that<br />

simulates the equilibrium of 2008–09. The 2008–09<br />

base was then shocked completely to equate a 2013–<br />

16 situation where all SAFTA duties are brought to 0.<br />

A best case scenario of complete elimination of sensitive<br />

lists is also assumed in this shock, i.e. Phase II of SAFTA.<br />

The study makes two key assumptions. First, all<br />

members will fully comply with their tariff reduction<br />

obligations that they agreed to in the SAFTA document.<br />

Second, all countries will fully liberalise their sensitive<br />

lists over the next nine years. The study also assumed<br />

that Afghanistan will have the status of a full member<br />

of SAARC in the near future.<br />

Using the general equilibrium analysis, the impact<br />

of SAFTA on production, employment, trade and<br />

welfare for each member country has been estimated.<br />

Afghanistan, Bhutan, Maldives and Nepal<br />

Though the ABMN group gets zero duty access to the<br />

developing countries by 2009 itself, its gains are limited<br />

on account of their inability to access agricultural<br />

products markets, which are blocked by the sensitive<br />

lists of the developing countries.<br />

There are gains in primary commodities with<br />

complete liberalisation in 2016. With the removal of<br />

sensitive lists in a full liberalisation scenario, ABMN<br />

Table 2 Impact of SAFTA on ABMN Gains (per cent)<br />

Output Effect on Exports Global Global<br />

Unskilled to Exports Imports<br />

Employ- South<br />

ment Asia<br />

2008-09 0.03 –0.0004 20.82 0.74 1.96<br />

2016 0.26 0.0002 60.32 7.89 11.99<br />

see good export growth in agriculture products and<br />

primary commodities (Table 2). Given that the<br />

agriculture and forestry sector in ABMN accounts for<br />

over 50% of domestic output, and given that these<br />

sectors are employment intensive, a full SAFTA is<br />

beneficial to ABMN. However, the manufacturing<br />

sectors in ABMN are by and large incompetitive, and<br />

hence suffer output and employment losses.<br />

Bangladesh<br />

Bangladesh’s welfare gains are one of the highest in<br />

South Asia. This may be attributed to the complete<br />

liberalisation of high MFN tariffs, which generates<br />

consumptive benefit for both the user industries as well<br />

as household consumers. Bangladesh has also seen an<br />

increase in global exports by a significant 4.31% on<br />

account SAFTA. Export gains for Bangladesh in SAFTA<br />

markets in Phase I of liberalisation (2008–09) are<br />

significant, but not as high as the peak export growths<br />

to SAFTA seen by other countries (Table 3).<br />

Table 3 Export Gains for Bangladesh in SAFTA<br />

Market (per cent)<br />

Output Effect on Exports Global Global<br />

Unskilled to Exports Imports<br />

Employ- South<br />

ment Asia<br />

2008-09 –0.01 0.0001 38.08 0.19 0.27<br />

2016 –0.03 0.0001 14.43 4.31 5.47<br />

The lack of strong growth may be attributed to<br />

India’s sensitive list, but it is in fact seen in the full<br />

liberalisation scenario (where all countries liberalise<br />

tariffs even on sensitive list items), Bangladesh does<br />

not make any significant regional export gains despite<br />

liberalisation of sensitive list items including garments.<br />

However, the most interesting result is that its global<br />

exports has seen a significant 5% rise in the second<br />

phase. Most of this growth is to regions outside South<br />

Asia.<br />

negative list for LDCs impedes EAMA in several garments products, which actually do form the bulk of Bangladesh’s global<br />

exports. The concessions which Pakistan and Maldives receive in the Indian market vis-à-vis each of their global exports is<br />

higher at 57% and 60% respectively.<br />

5<br />

The implementation of SAFTA commenced on 1 July 2006.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!