Report
Report
Report
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
88 QUANTIFICATION OF BENEFITS FROM ECONOMIC COOPERATION IN SOUTH ASIA<br />
The Potential<br />
The potential for Colombo Port comes not from<br />
increased Indo-Sri Lanka trade but from its potential<br />
as being a hub for trade from South Asian countries to<br />
the rest of the world. The Sri Lanka port authority<br />
(SLPA) aims for the Colombo Port to become a<br />
significant international player providing market-driven<br />
facilities and services to shipping lines. ADB (2007)<br />
estimates Colombo saw rapid growth in the early 1990s<br />
which averaged 20% per annum until 1998 when the<br />
growth stopped and the overall traffic volume remained<br />
static at about 1.7 million TEU per year despite India’s<br />
accelerated GDP growth. It was only in 2003 that<br />
growth resumed at 11%. The main reasons for stagnation<br />
of container traffic are attributed to increased direct<br />
calls JNPT; competition from the new ports of Salalah,<br />
Aden, Tanjung Pelepas and Port Klang; high tariff levels<br />
at Colombo compared with competing ports, and<br />
failure to respond to falling prices; civil strife; low<br />
operational efficiency: low productivity, congestion and<br />
ship delay at the port.<br />
ADB (2007) forecasts a positive business climate<br />
for Colombo Port. The container traffic forecast for<br />
container traffic both from domestic and Indian subcontinent<br />
(i.e. Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan) sources<br />
is shown in Table 9.20. It is noted that the economic<br />
growth of Indian subcontinent economies and the<br />
resulting growth in their import and export trades is<br />
the fundamental determinant of container transshipment<br />
volumes originating from these economies and<br />
hence Colombo Port’s traffic opportunity.<br />
Table 9.20 Forecast of Traffic at Colombo Port<br />
(000’ TEU)<br />
Indian Sub-Continent Container Transshipments<br />
Domestic Forecast % Trans- TEU (000)<br />
Container shipped via Trans-<br />
Growth Colombo, shipped<br />
Forecast<br />
Singapore,<br />
Salalah, etc.<br />
2002 546* 4,739* 45* 2,133*<br />
2005 727 6,658 39 2,597<br />
2010 1,118 11,219 35 3,927<br />
2015 1,643 17,262 33 5,696<br />
2020 2,414 24,211 30 7,263<br />
2030 4,975 47,626 26 12,383<br />
2040 9,786 93,688 16 14,990<br />
Note: * represents actuals which was used as the base for<br />
projections. 2040 forecast assumes unconstrained by<br />
port capacity limitations (000 TEU).<br />
Source: ADB (2007)<br />
It is expected that the potential transshipment share<br />
of the Indian subcontinent market will decline over time<br />
due to increased direct calls. ADB’s Colombo South<br />
Harbor project represents a landmark in project<br />
procurement and inward investment as well as recognising<br />
necessary reform. The impacts upon Colombo are<br />
expected to be significant, not only to the port users<br />
but to the entire community.<br />
The Colombo port also needs to cater to the<br />
increase in domestic exports. Overall, Sri Lanka’s<br />
exports accounted for 28% of GDP and imports for<br />
37% in 2005. Almost all national imports and exports<br />
are containerised. Most exports are destined for Europe<br />
and the US. However, imports are often materials for<br />
use in export industry and they come from the Far East<br />
and significantly from the Indian sub-continent.<br />
Hence potential to expand the Colombo port needs<br />
to consider the following points (ADB 2007):<br />
• Significant volumes of Bay of Bengal container<br />
cargo are transshipping across Singapore or Port<br />
Klang for Europe and North America which is<br />
probably more expensive and longer than<br />
transshipment at Colombo. Colombo needs to<br />
investigate ways of supporting and encouraging<br />
more frequent and more regular feeder services,<br />
notably to Chittagong by offering other special<br />
deals.<br />
• Capacity limitations at JNPT are prompting carriers<br />
to seek alternatives. Colombo offers a real<br />
alternative for European and Far Eastern cargoes<br />
and current users of JNPT should be targeted.<br />
• The potential for partnering with a range of small<br />
ports, of which Vizag could be a key example, to<br />
modify cargo flows for joint benefit requires<br />
investigation. This must be done in a way that does<br />
not adversely affect other significant port<br />
relationships.<br />
• The port is a national asset which should promote<br />
contacts with local exporters, importers and<br />
development agencies by demonstrating to them<br />
how the port is able to assist them. The growth of<br />
national cargo base is an important objective and<br />
direct foreign investment in local industrial exportoriented<br />
business is to be encouraged<br />
The Project<br />
ADB’s Colombo Port Expansion Project aims at the<br />
enhancement of operational efficiency at all of<br />
Colombo port’s container terminals and investment in