04.01.2014 Views

Report

Report

Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

82 QUANTIFICATION OF BENEFITS FROM ECONOMIC COOPERATION IN SOUTH ASIA<br />

Airlines, hotels, car rentals, companies, as well as<br />

manufacturing, construction, etc., are establishments<br />

that grow and contribute towards economic activity.<br />

However, we do not compute this into benefits<br />

calculation as this is already accounted for in the<br />

expenses on personal and business tourists, both<br />

domestic and foreign, on goods and services and would<br />

cause double-counting. Tourism has expanded greatly<br />

in the past two decades and is reportedly the world’s<br />

largest industry and provider of jobs, although<br />

measurement is extremely difficult and accurate<br />

statistics are scarce (WTTC 2003). It is estimated that<br />

international tourism generated about 10% of global<br />

GDP in 1994, accounted for over 10% of all consumer<br />

spending, created more than 12 million new jobs and<br />

provided more than $650 billion in tax revenues to<br />

governments. The magnitude of these figures explains<br />

why tourism is, or should be, a priority concern of<br />

governments worldwide. For the project, we consider<br />

20% of project costs as wage bill which is a direct<br />

benefit to people in the region.<br />

Non-visitor Exports: Non-visitor exports are indirect<br />

benefits from Tourism which include expenses on<br />

consumer goods such as clothing, electronic items, and<br />

petrol, which are exported for ultimate sale to visitors<br />

and capital goods such as aircrafts and cruise ships<br />

exported for use by the travel and tourism, providers.<br />

The growth trends for this category are very high at<br />

over 18%. We assume that this will grow at 15% over<br />

the coming years without the project.<br />

Table 9.11 Growth of Travel and Tourism in<br />

Northeastern States (US $ million)<br />

Year Personal Business Visitor Non-visitor<br />

Travel Travel Exports Exports<br />

2006E 280.71 36.71 52.68 33.14<br />

2007E 302.69 38.64 59.88 39.77<br />

2008E 330.24 41.29 66.36 47.54<br />

2009E 365.08 44.67 72.72 56.82<br />

2010E 404.71 48.44 79.68 67.92<br />

2011E 448.69 52.52 87.36 81.18<br />

2012E 497.48 56.95 95.76 97.02<br />

2013E 551.55 61.77 105.00 114.10<br />

2014E 611.51 67.02 115.08 134.13<br />

2015E 677.97 72.74 126.12 157.83<br />

Source: Computed based on WTTC 2005<br />

Total Benefits: A summation of total direct and indirect<br />

benefits will give us a figure for total tourism benefits.<br />

We do not for our analysis consider benefits from<br />

increased exports of goods already in the export market<br />

such as tea and handicrafts or potential exports of agricommodities.<br />

Past trends indicate a 10% growth per<br />

annum for each category except for non-visitor exports<br />

which have grown at over 18%. We now make a<br />

conservative assumption that with the project, that<br />

there is a further growth of 5% overall in the economy<br />

of the region for each of the categories. We then take<br />

the projected project benefits as the difference in<br />

benefits from without the project and with the project.<br />

Thus the trends in additional benefits from each of these<br />

categories is presented in Table 9.12.<br />

Table 9.12 Total benefits from the project (US $)<br />

Year Increase in Increase in Increase in Increase in<br />

Personal Business Visitor Non-visitor<br />

Consumption Expenditure Exports Exports<br />

1 13,256,700 1,717,926 2,256,000 1,375,782<br />

5 18,254,040 2,233,260 3,636,000 2,841,150<br />

10 30,575,340 3,351,078 5,754,000 6,706,680<br />

15 47,850,584 5,133,713 8,901,434 13,802,703<br />

20 67,545,004 7,246,655 12,565,100 24,141,013<br />

25 103,926,362 11,149,878 19,332,964 48,556,200<br />

Benefits Costs Analysis<br />

The direct costs of the project are the costs of investing<br />

in upgradation of the existing airport to international<br />

standards to allow for a small number of international<br />

flights, perhaps initially from the subregion and<br />

southeast and east Asia. We perform the BCA as though<br />

the government undertakes such a project on its own.<br />

We take a 25 year scenario with $150 million as project<br />

costs incurred over the five years at 10% in the first<br />

year, 20% in the second, 30% in the third and fourth<br />

year, and 10% in the last year. 20% of costs are the<br />

wage bill, and the benefits are assumed to accrue only<br />

after the end of the project. We take $1 million as<br />

maintenance costs in two phases after 10 years. This is<br />

over and above the regular costs for maintenance which<br />

Table 9.13 Results from Benefit-Cost Simulations<br />

Economic Rate Net Present<br />

of Return (%) Value (NPV) ($)<br />

Base Calculation 19.05 87,237,232<br />

Benefits lagged by 1 year 17.35 82,091,574<br />

Benefits lagged by 2 years 15.48 53,482,992<br />

Costs up by 10% 17.99 78,721,352<br />

Benefits lagged by 1 year 17.93 128,713,344<br />

Benefits lagged by 2 years 14.55 41,642,351<br />

Benefits down by 10% 17.88 69,955,064<br />

Benefits lagged by 1 year 17.82 114,564,718<br />

Benefits lagged by 2 years 14.44 36,200,825

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!