03.01.2014 Views

Self-Study Design - Howard University, Graduate School

Self-Study Design - Howard University, Graduate School

Self-Study Design - Howard University, Graduate School

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• The appointment, promotion and tenure policy and procedure<br />

• Faculty evaluation procedure for salary and merit adjustments<br />

• The role and responsibility of full-time, part-time, adjunct faculty (for example, teaching<br />

loads, committee work, service to the community, and research)<br />

• Published policies and procedures (for example, faculty handbook, travel policy, and<br />

sabbatical leave policy)<br />

Standard 11: Educational Offerings<br />

Chair: Professor Rodney Green, Economics<br />

Scope of Work and Objectives.<br />

This scope of work encompasses all of the academic and professional schools within the<br />

<strong>University</strong>, as well as many of the support units. The research design will address the academic<br />

content, rigor, and coherence, as well as student learning goals and objectives, within each of the<br />

academic units. The overall success of the <strong>University</strong> in achieving appropriate levels of academic<br />

content, rigor, and coherence, and student goals and objectives, will reflect this unit-by-unit<br />

analysis.<br />

Research Questions.<br />

1. What are the educational offerings (degree and certification programs) and related<br />

faculty, staff and student levels, qualifications, and characteristics?<br />

2. What have been the processes and outcomes of self-studies, external reviews, and<br />

responses to reviews across university units?<br />

3. Are the educational offerings congruent with the <strong>Howard</strong> <strong>University</strong> mission?<br />

4. Are expected learning outcomes properly articulated and documented in university units?<br />

5. Are there appropriate assessment tools for determining if the expected outcomes are<br />

being achieved?<br />

6. Do expected learning outcomes align well with the associated curriculum/a?<br />

7. Are learning resources appropriate for the educational offerings available, including<br />

resources and instructional processes to assure information literacy among students?<br />

8. What are the periodic assessments of the effectiveness of curricular, co-curricular, and<br />

extra-curricular experiences and how are such assessments used to improve student<br />

academic and personal development?<br />

Standard 12: General Education<br />

• Chair: Associate Dean Barbara Griffin, Arts and Sciences<br />

Scope of Work and Objectives.<br />

This scope of work examines whether or not <strong>Howard</strong> <strong>University</strong>’s general education curricula<br />

are “designed so that students acquire and demonstrate college-level proficiency in general<br />

education and essential skills, including at least oral and written communication, scientific and<br />

quantitative reasoning, critical analysis and reasoning, and technological competency”<br />

(Characteristics of Excellence in Higher Education, p.47). On a broader scale, the General<br />

Education Work Group will seek to explore those questions that will position the <strong>University</strong> to<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!