Self-Study Design - Howard University, Graduate School

Self-Study Design - Howard University, Graduate School Self-Study Design - Howard University, Graduate School

gs.howard.edu
from gs.howard.edu More from this publisher
03.01.2014 Views

esearch is an integral part of the academic experience for undergraduate, graduate, and professional school students. Because of Howard’s classification by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and its aspirations for the future as described above, it is a propitious time for the University to conduct a thorough and extensive assessment of its research enterprise. The Self-Study will be grounded within the broad scope of Howard University’s historic role in American higher education, assess how it compares with its peer institutions, and examine its aspirations as a major, national research university. Further, the study will evaluate the context of institutional mission, goals, and aspirations. Finally, the process will be open and transparent and use a variety of face-to-face and electronic means to elicit participation and involvement from all segments of the university community at every phase of work. With respect to the University’s recent history, Howard conducts this Self-Study approximately 20 years after the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching classified Howard University as a Research I university for the first time—the first for a minority-serving university in the United States. Thus, it is timely for the university to examine all of its policies, systems, operations, and resource allocations to determine their “goodness of fit” relative to its goals, mission, and aspirations as a research university. The Self-Study coincides also with the Howard University’s celebration of its 50 th anniversary of awarding its first Ph.D. degree. Since 1958, the year when the University awarded its first Ph.D. degree, it has made a meteoric rise as a doctoral granting institution. While it awards the Ph.D. degree annually to a multicultural, multiracial, and international group of recipients, Howard has become the nation’s largest on-campus producer of African-American Ph.D. recipients and the largest producer of African-American Ph.D.s in many fields. Annual Ph.D. productivity has been central to the University’s rise in the Carnegie classification. On a broader scale, Howard conducts the Self-Study at a time of great change and challenge in American higher education, which has a direct bearing on the University. For example, Howard, like its peers, faces increased public expectations for greater accountability and documentation of quality in an environment of increased costs and challenged financial resources. Moreover, Howard continues to be a major player in the national imperative to strengthen access and success for its culturally and racially diverse citizenry, while simultaneously seeking to continue to meet greater competition from the global community for the world’s best students and scholars. Finally, Howard, like the entire higher education community, addresses the rise of interdisciplinary approaches and changing ways of enhancing student learning, including a greater reliance on technology. These developments, and others, call for heightened assessments of issues of curriculum, teaching, student learning, and all phases of university life. Appointments of Senior Level Leadership Steps Taken To Prepare for the Self-Study President Swygert launched the University-Wide Self-Study in March 2007. Acting on the recommendation of Dr. Richard A. English, Provost and Chief Academic Officer, he appointed Dr. Orlando L. Taylor, Vice Provost for Research and Dean of the Graduate School, to chair the 11

Self-Study and Steering Committees and to provide overall oversight for the process through the anticipated site visit in the Spring of 2009. Dr. Taylor, a national leader within his discipline and one who has served as a faculty member and held many administrative positions at the University since 1973, is a seasoned veteran of higher education who has been a participant in many major developments at national research universities. Dr. Taylor served as Chair of the University-wide Self-Study Committee in 1987–89 in preparation for the University’s successful quest for reaffirmation of its accreditation in 1989. The initial phase of the Self-Study process was conducted under the Office of the Provost, with infrastructure and administrative support being provided as required. Dr. English, former dean of Howard’s School of Social Work, and similarly a national leader within his field, appointed Dr. Alvin Thornton, Associate Provost, to serve as a liaison to the Self-Study process. In a subsequent action, Dr. Donald Wilson, Senior Vice President of Health Affairs, upon the request of the President, appointed Dr. Charlene Hogan, Associate Dean of the College of Pharmacy, Nursing, and Allied Health Sciences, to serve in a similar role as Dr. Thornton. Dr. Hogan provides liaison between the Self-Study leadership and Dr. Donald Wilson, Senior Vice President for Health Sciences, and the Chief Administrative Officer for the College of Medicine; the College of Dentistry; and the College of Pharmacy, Nursing, and Allied Health Sciences The University President provides overall leadership of the Self-Study process and Dr. O. Jackson Cole, Executive Assistant to the President, serves as his liaison officer with Dr. Taylor and the Self-Study community. The President has designated Dr. Cole as the University’s Association Liaison Officer to the Middle States Commission on Higher Education. Dr. Cole served as one of the central administration liaison officers for the 1999 Self-Study and as a member of that Study’s Executive Committee. Board of Trustee Engagement Because of the centrality of the Self-Study process to Board of Trustee interests, and its relationship to other Board initiatives, namely the Presidential Search Committee, the Leadership Transition Committee, the Long Range Financial Planning Committee, and its own Academic Excellence Initiative, two Board members were designated to work directly with the Self-Study process. Specifically, Ms. Marie Johns, Chair of the Board’s Academic Excellence Committee, agreed to serve on the Self-Study Steering Committee and Dr. Charles McDonald agreed to serve as an external committee member and Board liaison for the Mission and Goals and Leadership and Governance Work Groups. Steering and Executive Committees Established Due to the comprehensive nature of the Self-Study and the vast amounts of data and resources to collect and analyze, the University formed an Executive Committee and a Steering Committee to direct and organize the work of administrators, faculty, staff, and students. The Steering Committee comprises a broad range of individuals from the University. In addition to including faculty, administrators, staff, and students, the Steering Committee includes Board of Trustee members who are actively engaged in the Self-Study process. The Steering Committee handles the overall direction of the Self-Study. 12

esearch is an integral part of the academic experience for undergraduate, graduate, and<br />

professional school students. Because of <strong>Howard</strong>’s classification by the Carnegie Foundation for<br />

the Advancement of Teaching and its aspirations for the future as described above, it is a<br />

propitious time for the <strong>University</strong> to conduct a thorough and extensive assessment of its research<br />

enterprise.<br />

The <strong>Self</strong>-<strong>Study</strong> will be grounded within the broad scope of <strong>Howard</strong> <strong>University</strong>’s historic role in<br />

American higher education, assess how it compares with its peer institutions, and examine its<br />

aspirations as a major, national research university. Further, the study will evaluate the context of<br />

institutional mission, goals, and aspirations. Finally, the process will be open and transparent and<br />

use a variety of face-to-face and electronic means to elicit participation and involvement from all<br />

segments of the university community at every phase of work.<br />

With respect to the <strong>University</strong>’s recent history, <strong>Howard</strong> conducts this <strong>Self</strong>-<strong>Study</strong> approximately<br />

20 years after the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching classified <strong>Howard</strong><br />

<strong>University</strong> as a Research I university for the first time—the first for a minority-serving university<br />

in the United States. Thus, it is timely for the university to examine all of its policies, systems,<br />

operations, and resource allocations to determine their “goodness of fit” relative to its goals,<br />

mission, and aspirations as a research university.<br />

The <strong>Self</strong>-<strong>Study</strong> coincides also with the <strong>Howard</strong> <strong>University</strong>’s celebration of its 50 th anniversary of<br />

awarding its first Ph.D. degree. Since 1958, the year when the <strong>University</strong> awarded its first Ph.D.<br />

degree, it has made a meteoric rise as a doctoral granting institution. While it awards the Ph.D.<br />

degree annually to a multicultural, multiracial, and international group of recipients, <strong>Howard</strong> has<br />

become the nation’s largest on-campus producer of African-American Ph.D. recipients and the<br />

largest producer of African-American Ph.D.s in many fields. Annual Ph.D. productivity has been<br />

central to the <strong>University</strong>’s rise in the Carnegie classification.<br />

On a broader scale, <strong>Howard</strong> conducts the <strong>Self</strong>-<strong>Study</strong> at a time of great change and challenge in<br />

American higher education, which has a direct bearing on the <strong>University</strong>. For example, <strong>Howard</strong>,<br />

like its peers, faces increased public expectations for greater accountability and documentation of<br />

quality in an environment of increased costs and challenged financial resources. Moreover,<br />

<strong>Howard</strong> continues to be a major player in the national imperative to strengthen access and<br />

success for its culturally and racially diverse citizenry, while simultaneously seeking to continue<br />

to meet greater competition from the global community for the world’s best students and<br />

scholars. Finally, <strong>Howard</strong>, like the entire higher education community, addresses the rise of<br />

interdisciplinary approaches and changing ways of enhancing student learning, including a<br />

greater reliance on technology. These developments, and others, call for heightened assessments<br />

of issues of curriculum, teaching, student learning, and all phases of university life.<br />

Appointments of Senior Level Leadership<br />

Steps Taken To Prepare for the <strong>Self</strong>-<strong>Study</strong><br />

President Swygert launched the <strong>University</strong>-Wide <strong>Self</strong>-<strong>Study</strong> in March 2007. Acting on the<br />

recommendation of Dr. Richard A. English, Provost and Chief Academic Officer, he appointed<br />

Dr. Orlando L. Taylor, Vice Provost for Research and Dean of the <strong>Graduate</strong> <strong>School</strong>, to chair the<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!