Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Journal of Animal Production Advances<br />
Effect of Feeding Processed Sweet Sorghum (Sorghum Bicolour<br />
(L) Moench) Bagasse based Total Mixed Ration on<br />
Performance of Graded Murrah Buffaloes<br />
Venkata Seshaiah Ch. and Ramana Reddy Y.<br />
J Anim Prod Adv 2012, 2(7): 329-334<br />
Online version is available on: www.grjournals.com
ISSN: 2251-7677<br />
VENKATA SESHAIAH AND RAMANA REDDY<br />
Original Article<br />
Effect of Feeding Processed Sweet Sorghum<br />
(Sorghum Bicolour (L) Moench) Bagasse based<br />
Total Mixed Ration on Performance of Graded<br />
Murrah Buffaloes<br />
Venkata Seshaiah Ch. and Ramana Reddy Y.<br />
Department of Livestock Production & management, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, College of Veterinary Science,<br />
Rajendranagar, Hyderabad<br />
Abstract<br />
Sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolour (L.) moench) bagasse (SSB), a by-product obtained after juice<br />
extraction from the stalks of sweet sorghum was used as a sole roughage in the total mixed ration (TMR) at 50<br />
per cent level and processed in to SSB chopped plus concentrate (SSBC), mash (SSBM) and expander extruder<br />
pellets (SSBP) and compared with sorghum straw (SS) based TMR in mash form (SSM). The effect of feeding<br />
processed TMR on feed intake, nutrients digestibility, milk and milk constituent’s yield and cost of milk<br />
production was studied in 24 lactating graded Murrah buffaloes divided into four groups (average of 3.0<br />
lactations and 450 kg body weight) in a complete randomized design and fed the experimental rations for a<br />
period of 150 days. The dry matter (DM) intake (kg/d), digestibilities of DM, organic matter, crude protein and<br />
nitrogen free extract and milk yield (kg/d) and total solids, solids not fat, milk fat and protein yield (g/d) were<br />
higher (P
EFFECT FEEDING PROCESSED SWEET SORGHUM (SORGHUM BICOLOUR (L) MOENCH)…<br />
Introduction<br />
Sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolour (L)<br />
moench), a dry land crop is more water use efficient<br />
than sugar cane and recently gaining importance as<br />
a feedstock for ethanol production (Reddy et al.,<br />
2005). In general, it can produce stalk 54 - 69 t/ha<br />
(Almodares et al., 2008). The bagasse produced<br />
after juice extraction from stalks available as a<br />
waste at sweet sorghum crushing units established<br />
by ICRISAT and private distilleries in Medak<br />
District of Andhra Pradesh State in India. In view of<br />
the shortage of roughages for animal feeding in<br />
India, there is need to identify alternate roughage<br />
sources to feed the vast ruminant population of this<br />
country. Feeding of roughages in the form of total<br />
mixed ration (TMR) improved the palatability and<br />
utilization of bulky crop residues (Nagalakshmi et<br />
al., 2006). Further, expander extruder processing of<br />
TMR showed beneficial effects on feed intake and<br />
digestibility of nutrients (Prasad D A 2003 and<br />
Nagalakshmi et al., 2006).<br />
The objective of the present study is to evaluate<br />
processed SSB based TMR on feed intake, nutrients<br />
digestibility, milk and milk constituents yield and<br />
cost of milk production in lactating graded Murrah<br />
buffaloes and compared with SS based TMR<br />
feeding system which is prevalent in and around<br />
Hyderabad of Andhra Pradesh State in India.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
SSB was procured from the decentralized sweet<br />
sorghum crushing unit, established by ICRISAT at<br />
Ibrahimbad village of Medak District of Andhra<br />
Pradesh. Experimental TMR were formulated with<br />
SSB and concentrate in a ratio of 50:50 and<br />
processed in to chopped SSB plus concentrate<br />
(SSBC), mash form (SSBM) and expander-extruder<br />
pellet form (SSBP). The control TMR was sorghum<br />
straw (SS) based mash (SSM) in the same roughage<br />
to concentrate ratio. The cost of the rations was<br />
calculated on the basis of processing cost and the<br />
prevailing market prices of the feed ingredients.<br />
Twenty four lactating graded Murrah buffaloes<br />
with an average of 3.0 lactations and weighing<br />
about 450 kg were distributed randomly into four<br />
experimental groups of six animals each in a<br />
complete randomized design (CRD) considering<br />
number of lactation, stage of lactation, daily<br />
average milk yield and butter fat content, as<br />
uniform as possible. Daily feed intake, water intake,<br />
residue leftover and milk yields were recorded. A 7<br />
day digestion trial was conducted at the end of 150<br />
day lactation trial to assess the nutrient digestibility<br />
of the experimental diets. The milk samples were<br />
collected fortnightly during the lactation trial to<br />
evaluate quality and quantity of milk constituents.<br />
The feed and faecal samples were analysed for<br />
proximate constituents (AOAC, 1997) and fibre<br />
fractions (Van Soest et al., 1991). Digestible (DE)<br />
and metabolizable (ME) energy values were<br />
calculated from total digestible nutrients (TDN)<br />
using factors suggested by NRC (1989). Milk<br />
samples were analysed for fat (ISI, 1961) and solids<br />
not fat (SNF) (ISI, 1965). The data was statistically<br />
analysed as per procedures suggested by Snedecor<br />
G W and Cochran W G (1994)<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
SSB on dry matter basis contained 90.75 %<br />
organic matter (OM), 3.94 % crude protein (CP),<br />
1.89 % ether extract (EE), 37.58 % crude fibre<br />
(CF), 47.34 % nitrogen free extract (NFE), 9.25 %<br />
total ash (TA), 74.76 % neutral detergent fiber<br />
(NDF), 42.93 % acid detergent fiber (ADF), 31.84<br />
% cellulose, 37.75 % hemicelluloses and 4.24 %<br />
lignin. The proximate principles and cell wall<br />
fractions of sorghum and maize stover (Misra et<br />
al., 2009) and sorghum varieties (Fadel Elseed et<br />
al., 2007) and sweet sorghum hybrids (Blümmel et<br />
al., 2009) were also comparable to SSB.<br />
The chemical composition of processed SSB<br />
and SS based TMR were comparable (Table 1) as<br />
the processing does not have any effect on chemical<br />
composition among rations corroborating the<br />
findings of Chander datt et al., (2011), reported<br />
similar chemical composition for processed paddy<br />
straw based TMR.<br />
The average DMI (kg/d) was higher (P
esulted into more feed intake corroborating the<br />
findings of Nagalakshmi et al., (2004) in lactating<br />
VENKATA SESHAIAH AND RAMANA REDDY<br />
buffaloes fed cotton straw based TMR.<br />
Table 1: Ingredient and chemical composition of experimental total mixed rations<br />
Ingredient/Nutrient SSM SSBC SSBM SSBP<br />
Ingredient composition (kg/100kg)<br />
Maize 31.0 31.0 31.0<br />
Ground nut cake 16.5 16.5 16.5 31.0<br />
Sunflower cake 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0<br />
Deoiled rice bran 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0<br />
Molasses 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0<br />
Urea 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5<br />
Mineral mixture 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0<br />
Salt 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0<br />
Sweet sorghum bagasse - 50.0 50.0 50.0<br />
Jowar straw 50.0 - - -<br />
Vitamin AD 3 (g/qt) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0<br />
Chemical composition (% DM basis) *<br />
Dry matter 91.5 91.92 92.19 94.08<br />
Organic matter 90.32 90.31 90.23 90.27<br />
Crude protein 11.15 11.55 11.66 11.73<br />
Ether extract 1.34 2.00 1.98 1.99<br />
Crude fibre 27.39 26.85 27.13 26.95<br />
Nitrogen free extract 50.44 49.91 49.46 49.60<br />
Neutral detergent fibre 9.68 9.69 9.77 9.73<br />
Acid detergent fibre 31.11 29.48 30.22 29.67<br />
Hemicellulose 21.43 25.52 22.33 22.80<br />
Cellulose 21.46 23.27 23.66 23.35<br />
Lignin 4.19 3.43 3.94 3.78<br />
* Each value is the average of three observations<br />
On dry matter basis except for dry matter<br />
Higher (P
EFFECT FEEDING PROCESSED SWEET SORGHUM (SORGHUM BICOLOUR (L) MOENCH)…<br />
rations were not significant. All the experimental<br />
buffaloes met the nutrient requirements (ICAR<br />
1998)<br />
The milk yield (kg/day) and total solids, solids<br />
not fat (SNF), milk fat and protein yield (g/d) was<br />
higher (P
VENKATA SESHAIAH AND RAMANA REDDY<br />
Table 3: Effect of feeding processed sweet sorghum bagasse based total mixed rations on quality and<br />
quantity of milk production in lactating graded Murrah buffaloes<br />
Parameter SSM SSBC SSBM SSBP SEM<br />
Milk yield (kg/d) 5.29 b 5.17 b 5.54 b 6.91 a 0.20<br />
Total solids (%) 17.73 18.20 18.02 17.62 0.23<br />
Solids not fat (%) 10.38 10.58 10.59 10.50 0.11<br />
Milk fat (%) 7.35 7.61 7.43 7.04 0.16<br />
Milk protein (%) 4.32 4.30 4.38 4.44 0.03<br />
Milk constituents yield (g/d)<br />
Total solids 937.92 b 940.94 b 998.31 b 1217.54 a 4.20<br />
Solids not fat 549.10 b 546.99 b 546.69 b 731.08 a 3.45<br />
Milk fat 388.82 b 393.44 b 411.62 b 486.46 a 2.43<br />
Milk protein 228.53 b 226.45 b 242.65 b 306.80 a 1.80<br />
Each value is the average of six observations<br />
a,b values bearing different superscripts in a row differ significantly (P
EFFECT FEEDING PROCESSED SWEET SORGHUM (SORGHUM BICOLOUR (L) MOENCH)…<br />
corroborates with the findings of Nagalakshmi D<br />
and Narasimha Reddy D, (2010), reported lower<br />
daily cost of feeding in lactating buffaloes fed<br />
sugarcane bagasse based expander-extruder<br />
pelleted ration (Rs. 51.43) compared to<br />
conventional ration (Rs. 73.66). Replacement of<br />
SS with SSB in TMR reduced the cost of milk<br />
production by 22 per cent in buffaloes. Further<br />
feeding of TMR in the form of expander-extruder<br />
pellets further increased the milk production by<br />
20% in buffaloes over mash and chopped form of<br />
the TMR.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The results of the present study indicated<br />
that SSB may be used as roughage source in<br />
place of SS in TMR for economic milk<br />
production. Further, expander-extruder processing<br />
of SSB based TMR improved milk production feed<br />
efficiency and decreased cost of milk production<br />
compared to mash and chopped form of the same<br />
ration.<br />
References<br />
Almodares A, Taheri R, Adeli S (2008) Stalk yield and<br />
carbohydrate composition of sweet sorghum (sorghum<br />
bicolour (L.) Moench) cultivars and lines at different<br />
growth stages. J. Malaysian Appl. Bio., 37: 31-36.<br />
AOAC (1997) Association of Official Analytical Chemist,<br />
Official method of Analysis. 16 th Ed. Association of<br />
Official Analytical Chemist, Washington, D C.<br />
Blümmel M, Rao SS, Palaniswami S, Shah L and Reddy BVS<br />
(2009) Evaluation of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor<br />
(L.) Moench) used for bio-ethanol production in the<br />
context of optimizing whole plant utilization. Anim.<br />
Nutr. Feed Tech., 9: 1-10.<br />
Chander datt, Reddy GVN, Kundu SS (2011) Effect of feeding<br />
differently processed paddy straw based complete diets<br />
on feed intake and nutrient utilization in Nellore rams.<br />
Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 28(2): 160-165<br />
Fadel Elseed AMA, Nor Eldamin I, Amasaib EO (20077)<br />
Chemical composition and in situ dry matter<br />
degradability of stover fractions of five sorghum<br />
varieties. J. Appl. Sci. Res., 3(10): 1141-1145.<br />
ICAR (1998) Nutrient requirement of Livestock and Poultry,<br />
New Delhi.<br />
ISI (1977) IS: 1224 (Part I) Fat determination of milk by<br />
Gerber’s method. Indian Standards Institution, New<br />
Delhi.<br />
ISI (1982) IS: 10083 Method of test for determination of SNF<br />
(Solids not fat) in milk by the use of lactometer-Indian<br />
standards Institution, New Delhi.<br />
Khan SR, Singh SK, Mudgal Vishal (2010) Effect of feeding<br />
TMRs on the performance of lactating cross breed cows.<br />
Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 27 (3): 261-264<br />
Misra AK, Chauhan V, Yadav SK, Maruthi Sankar GR (2009)<br />
Nutritive value of commonly used feed resources in<br />
telangana region of Andhra Pradesh. Indian J. Anim.<br />
Nutr., 26(1): 23-28.<br />
Nagalakshmi D, Narasimha Reddy D (2010) Effect of feeding<br />
expander-extruder processed total mixed diet containing<br />
sugar cane bagasse on performance of Murrah Buffaloes.<br />
Anim. Nutr. Feed Tech., 10:1-8<br />
Nagalakshmi D, Narasimha Reddy D, Kishan Kumar M<br />
(2004) Performance of Murrah buffaloes fed expanderpelleted<br />
cotton straw based diets. Anim. Nutr. Feed<br />
Tech., 10: 1-8<br />
Nagalakshmi D, Narasimha Reddy D, Prasad MR (2006)<br />
Evaluation of expander-extruder processed total mixed<br />
diet containing sunflower heads in lactating cross breed<br />
cows: An on farm trial. Indian J. Dairy Sci., 59: 233-238.<br />
NRC (1989) Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 6 th rev.ed.<br />
National Academy Press, Washington, DC.<br />
Prasad DA (2003) Extrusion-expansion applications in the<br />
feed industry. In: Short term course on feed technology,<br />
January 20 to 10 th Febuary, 2003. Acharya N.G Ranga<br />
Agricultural University, Hyderabad, India, pp.102-108.<br />
Reddy BVS, Ramesh S, Reddy PS, Ramaiah B, Salimath PM,<br />
Kachapur R (2005) Sweet sorghum – a potential<br />
alternative raw material for bio- ethanol and bio –<br />
energy. International Sorghum and Millets News Letter,<br />
46: 79-86.<br />
Reyes-Jáquez D., Vargas-Rodríguez J., Delgado-Licon E.,<br />
Rodríguez-Miranda J., Araiza-Rosales E. E., Andrade-<br />
González I., Solís-Soto A, Medrano-Roldan H (2011)<br />
Optimization of the extrusion process temperature and<br />
moisture content on the functional properties and in vitro<br />
digestibility of bovine cattle feed made out of waste bean<br />
flour. J. Anim. Sci. Adv., 1(2): 100-110<br />
Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1994) Statistical methods. 8 th<br />
edn, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA-<br />
50010.<br />
Solanas E, Castrillo C, Calsamiglia S (2007) Effect of<br />
extruding the cereal and/or the legume protein<br />
supplement of a compound feed on in vitro ruminal<br />
nutrient digestion and nitrogen metabolism. J. Anim.<br />
Phys. Nutr., 91: 269–277<br />
VanSoest PJ, Robertson JD, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for<br />
dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre non-starch<br />
polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy<br />
Sci., 74: 3583-3597.<br />
334 J. Anim. Prod. Adv., 2012, 2(7):329-334