03.01.2014 Views

PDF Download

PDF Download

PDF Download

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Journal of Animal Science Advances<br />

Effect of Graded Levels of Mexican Sunflower Leaf (Tithonia<br />

Diversifolia Hemsl.A. Gray) Meal on the Feed Intake of Ewe<br />

during the Entire Lactation Period of 90 Days<br />

Ekeocha A. H.<br />

J Anim Sci Adv 2012, 2(9): 727-733<br />

Online version is available on: www.grjournals.com


ISSN: 2251-7219<br />

EKEOCHA<br />

Effect of Graded Levels of Mexican Sunflower Leaf<br />

(Tithonia Diversifolia Hemsl.A. Gray) Meal on the<br />

Feed Intake of Ewe during the Entire Lactation<br />

Period of 90 Days<br />

Abstract<br />

Ekeocha A. H.<br />

Department of Animal Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.<br />

Original Article<br />

A 90 – day feeding trial was conducted to evaluate Mexican Sunflower leaf (MSL) as dietary fiber source<br />

in sheep diets. Straight diets were formulated to contain the MSL at dietary levels of 0%, 15%, 30% and 45% as<br />

replacement for wheat bran. Sixteen (16) West African dwarf ewe weighing 19.50 to 22.46kg were allotted to<br />

the 4 diets containing four replicates per treatment with 1 ewe per replicate in a completely randomized design<br />

(CRD). Ewes were given ad libitum access to feed and water and routine vaccination and medication followed<br />

standard procedures. Parameters measured were changes in feed intake during early, mid and late lactation,<br />

Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) and DM : LW %. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and ANOVA.<br />

There were significant (p diet D (17.60kg) although no statistical significance<br />

(P>0.05) was observed. There was no significant correlation between live-weight at mating and duration of<br />

pregnancy or live-weight at mating and lambs birth weight. Inclusion of up to 30% MSLM in the diets of<br />

lactating ewe appeared most beneficial to sheep as it had no negative effects on dry matter and nutrient intake.<br />

Keywords: Mexican sunflower leaf, feed intake, lactation period<br />

Corresponding author: Department of Animal Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria<br />

Received on: 22 Aug 2012<br />

Revised on: 05 Sep 2012<br />

Accepted on: 15 Sep 2012<br />

Online Published on: 30 Sep 2012<br />

727 J. Anim. Sci. Adv., 2012, 2(9):727-733


EFFECT OF GRADED LEVELS OF MEXICAN SUNFLOWER LEAF …<br />

Introduction<br />

Lactation plays an important role in the life of<br />

sheep. Apart from provision of milk for humans,<br />

lactation is an indication of good lamb performance.<br />

Owen (1981) reported that the main difference in<br />

lamb growth arising from lactation is due to<br />

variation in the yield of milk. Poor quality feed<br />

especially during the dry season has been identified<br />

as one of the major constraints to small scale dairy<br />

production (Barje et al., 1999).<br />

In most animals not specialized for milk<br />

production, the composition of milk is, apart from<br />

vitamins, is largely independent of the quality of the<br />

diets, any inadequacy or shortages being reflected<br />

by a diminished yield (McDonald et al., 1987).<br />

Sheep milk composition can also be influenced by<br />

different feeds, grazing systems and by subclinical<br />

mastitic conditions (Bufano et al., 1996). Milk<br />

composition of major and minor components is<br />

affected by feeding regimes, ration components and<br />

forage : grain ratios (Perea et al., 2000). Studies by<br />

Ekeocha et al., 2012 have shown that lactating West<br />

African dwarf ewes fed on Mexican sunflower leaf<br />

meal based diets have substantial mineral profile at<br />

her disposal.<br />

However, research emphasis worldwide has<br />

been on sheep wool and meat production and their<br />

characteristics, not on sheep milk.<br />

Most textbooks on “Milk” deal only with cow<br />

milk, and human milk to some extent (Kon and<br />

Cowie, 1961; Falconer, 1971; Renner, 1982;<br />

Gravert, 1983). The only major sources of research<br />

information on sheep milk appear to be the bulletins<br />

and proceedings of the International Dairy<br />

Federation Seminars held in Greece in 1985 and<br />

1995 (IDF, 1983; 1986; 1996). Not even the 1 st<br />

World Congress of Dairy Products in Human<br />

Health and Nutrition (Serrano Rios, 1994)<br />

recognized the existence or contribution of sheep<br />

milk products to human nutrition, nor does the<br />

handbook of the US Sheep Industry Development<br />

Program (Scott, 1986). In France, the scientific<br />

journal Le Lait devoted an entire issue to goat milk,<br />

including its role as an alternative to cow milk (Le<br />

Lait, 1993). A biobliography on goat milk (Freund,<br />

2000), and the proceedings of a national colloquium<br />

on the nutritional and dietetic qualities of goat milk<br />

(Freund, 1996) have been published, but similar<br />

efforts on sheep milk are still missing. Even a book<br />

on buffalo milk is available (Deepak Sahai, 1996).<br />

Searching the CAB for the past 10 years, the<br />

numbers of publications worldwide on sheep milk,<br />

sheep cheese and allergies related to sheep milk are<br />

minor compared to those on cow milk (King, 1988).<br />

Certainly there are more publications in earlier<br />

years, but those would be based on less<br />

sophisticated analytical methods. Publications on<br />

the nutritional value of sheep milk often give only<br />

gross composition without detailed identification of<br />

more specific unique components of benefit in<br />

human nutrition, although trade magazines contain<br />

many anecdotal reports that are waiting for<br />

scientific evaluation. However, among the 1,000<br />

research projects on sheep worldwide (King, 1988),<br />

less than 4% deal with topics of sheep milk and<br />

sheep dairying.<br />

This experiment is aimed at evaluating feed<br />

intake and weight change from WAD ewes fed<br />

MSLM based diets during lactation.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Experimental Site<br />

This study was carried out at the sheep unit of<br />

the University of Ibadan Teaching and Research<br />

farm.<br />

Management of Experimental Animals<br />

Sixteen WAD ewes aged between 16 - 17<br />

months and weighing 19.50 – 22.46kg were used.<br />

The management of experimental animals was same<br />

as for the feeding trial.<br />

Oestrus Synchronisation<br />

Oestrus was artificially synchronized in all the<br />

animals using Dinoprost tromethanine solution<br />

PGF 2 -Tuco products, Canada),<br />

administered intra-muscularly in two doses of 1ml<br />

given 19 days apart. Rams bred at the sheep unit of<br />

Teaching and Research farm were introduced once<br />

signs of heat were detected. Mating was allowed<br />

before 08.00hrs and after 18.00hrs to minimize heat<br />

stress on the rams. All ewes were weighed at mating<br />

and monthly thereafter till parturition and continued<br />

till end of lactation.<br />

728 J. Anim. Sci. Adv., 2012, 2(9):727-733


EKEOCHA<br />

Routine Observed During Lactation Trial<br />

At parturition, the dams were weighed, lambs<br />

were weighed and their sex was recorded.<br />

Thereafter lambs were weighed weekly.<br />

The ewes were group penned and fed during<br />

the period of the lactation trial. At every 4 th , 8 th and<br />

12 th week, each ewe was weighed individually<br />

penned and total feed intake was taken for that<br />

week. Clean water was constantly available<br />

throughout the experimental period. Ewes were then<br />

reweighed and returned to their group pens. This<br />

was continued till end of lactation.<br />

Statistical Analysis<br />

Data obtained were subjected to analysis of<br />

variance (ANOVA) using the General Linear Model<br />

(GLM) of SAS software (SAS, 1999). Treatment<br />

means were compared by Duncan option of the<br />

software.<br />

Table 1: Ingredient composition of experimental diet<br />

Ingredients %<br />

Rations<br />

A B C D<br />

MSLM 1 0.00 15.00 30.00 45.00<br />

Wheat bran 45.00 30.00 15.00 0.00<br />

Cassava peel 33.20 33.20 33.20 33.20<br />

Palm kernel meal 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00<br />

Ground nut cake 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00<br />

Oyster shell 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50<br />

Bone meal 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50<br />

Mineral/Vit. Premix 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30<br />

Common salt 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50<br />

MSLM=Mexican Sunflower Leaf Meal, A = 0%MSLM, B =15% MSLM, C =<br />

30% MSLM, D = 45% MSLM<br />

Table 2 : Proximate composition of experimental diet<br />

Constituents %<br />

Rations<br />

A B C D<br />

Dry matter 92.00 91.00 90.00 89.00<br />

Crude protein 17.10 16.90 16.50 16.20<br />

Crude fiber 15.70 16.40 17.00 17.50<br />

Ether extract 3.47 3.63 3.70 3.75<br />

Ash 8.60 9.40 10.10 11.30<br />

NFE 1 55.13 53.67 52.70 51.25<br />

ADF 2 22.54 26.70 30.85 35.01<br />

NDF 3<br />

ADL 4 43.15<br />

7.92<br />

44.50<br />

8.41<br />

45.85<br />

9.03<br />

47.20<br />

9.85<br />

Gross energy(kcal/kg) 3829.5 3805.5 3781.0 3735.5<br />

1 NFE= nitrogen free extract<br />

2 ADF= acid detergent fiber<br />

3 NDF= neutral detergent fiber<br />

4 ADL = acid detergent lignin<br />

729 J. Anim. Sci. Adv., 2012, 2(9):727-733


EFFECT OF GRADED LEVELS OF MEXICAN SUNFLOWER LEAF …<br />

Table 3: Chemical Composition of Dried Mexican Sunflower Leaf Meal (MSLM),<br />

Wheat bran and Panicum maximum<br />

Components MSLM Wheat bran Panicum maximum<br />

Dry matter 89.00 89.00 26.00<br />

Crude protein (CP) 16.33 17.00 7.95<br />

Crude fiber (CF) 21.80 8.50 31.00<br />

Ether extract (EE) 2.81 3.50 4.00<br />

Ash 14.68 13.01 8.90<br />

NFE 1 44.38 57.99 48.15<br />

ADF 2 42.63 25.00 42.70<br />

NDF 3 60.00 51.00 74.30<br />

Hemi cellulose 17.37 26.00 31.60<br />

ADL 4 9.96 8.60 13.87<br />

1 NFE= nitrogen free extract<br />

2 ADF= acid detergent fiber<br />

3 NDF= neutral detergent fiber<br />

4 ADL= acid detergent lignin<br />

Table 4: Anti Nutritional Factors in MSLM<br />

Component<br />

Quantity (mg/100g)<br />

Total Alkaloid 6.32<br />

Saponin 1.05<br />

Oxalate 5.25<br />

Phytate 8.81<br />

Tannin 5.19<br />

Glycosides 0.42<br />

Phenol 0.53<br />

Source: Ekeocha (2009)<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Feed Intake<br />

The chemical composition of grass (Panicum<br />

maximum) and the concentrate supplements are<br />

presented in (Tables 2 and 3). Dry matter intake<br />

(DMI) at early, mid and late lactation is presented in<br />

Table 5. Average total DMI (g/d) increased<br />

gradually from average values of 503.29, 782.81,<br />

562.39, and 441.82g/day in early lactation to<br />

512.69, 797.44, 572.91, and 450.06g/day in mid<br />

lactation and decreased slightly to average values of<br />

493.90, 768.20, 551.90, and 433.56g/day in late<br />

lactation for animals on diets A, B, C and D<br />

respectively.<br />

Dietary effects on total DMI were not<br />

significant (P


EKEOCHA<br />

Table 5: Feed intake of ewe during lactation (g/day)<br />

Treatment A(0%MSLM) B(15%MSLM) C(30%MSLM) D(45%MSLM) SEM<br />

Early Lactation<br />

Concentrate 356.14 ab 604.57 a 319.17 ab 204.74 b 213.81<br />

Grass 147.15 b 178.25 b 243.23 a 237.08 a 35.76<br />

Total DMI 503.29 782.81 562.39 441.82 226.17<br />

DMI g/dWkg 0.75 106.26 147.99 115.49 96.37 69.36<br />

DM ÷ LW% 2.55 3.86 2.70 2.27 1.12<br />

Mid Lactation<br />

Concentrate 362.80 ab 615.87 a 325.13 ab 208.57 b 219.81<br />

Grass 149.90 b 181.58 b 247.77 a 241.51 a 43.61<br />

Total DMI 512.69 797.44 572.91 450.06 240.00<br />

DMI g/dWkg 0.75 107.74 150.06 117.10 97.71 70.32<br />

DM ÷ LW% 2.73 3.96 2.94 2.44 1.20<br />

Late Lactation<br />

Concentrate 349.50 ab 593.30 a 313.20 ab 200.92 b 209.82<br />

Grass 144.39 b 174.92 b 238.68 a 232.64 a 35.09<br />

Total DMI 493.90 768.20 551.90 433.56 221.94<br />

DMI g/dWkg 0.75 104.77 145.92 113.87 95.01 68.28<br />

DM ÷ LW% 2.77 3.83 2.90 2.46 1.18<br />

ab means on the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P0.05) with increasing inclusion of<br />

MSLM. Kruip-Tam et al (1996) earlier enunciated<br />

the occurrence of an apparently unavoidable post<br />

partum negative nutrient balance in animals selected<br />

for milk yield. The combination of increasing<br />

demand for milk yields and insufficiently increased<br />

feed intake capacity led to a gap between energy<br />

input and energy output at the onset of lactation<br />

which could only be compensated for by lipolysis<br />

and protein mobilization from body tissues resulting<br />

in net loss in weight. Owens (1981) further<br />

highlighted that the requirements of a ewe in peak<br />

lactation are approximately three times those of a<br />

dry ewe. However, it is normally impracticable to<br />

increase the energy concentration of the diet<br />

sufficiently to match this increased demand<br />

particularly since ewe in the first 3-4 weeks of<br />

lactation have not reached maximum voluntary feed<br />

intake. Observed variations were not significant<br />

(P>0.05) on reproductive performance although<br />

animals on treatment B was superior to others in<br />

weight at parturition, lamb birth weight, shorter<br />

gestation length and weight gain during pregnancy.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Mexican sunflower leaves provides an<br />

opportunity to enhance utilization of the fibrous<br />

fraction, and to raise the overall protein and energy<br />

density of ruminant diets thus sparing wheat bran<br />

which is unsustainable all year round due to<br />

seasonal effect. There will also be potential for<br />

indirect environmental benefits from making greater<br />

use of MSL in ruminant diets, because of the<br />

environmental pollution associated with burning of<br />

MSL. However, this potential will only be realized<br />

in practice when the improved supply of digestible<br />

energy at the level of the rumen is reflected in<br />

improved animal performance, which requires a<br />

concomitant improvement in the balance of<br />

essential nutrients available for metabolism by the<br />

animal and possibly production of meat. Based on<br />

the overall performance, inclusion of 15% Mexican<br />

sunflower leaf meal in the diets of lactating ewes<br />

appeared most beneficial to sheep as it improved<br />

dry matter intake and reproductive performance but<br />

731 J. Anim. Sci. Adv., 2012, 2(9):727-733


EFFECT OF GRADED LEVELS OF MEXICAN SUNFLOWER LEAF …<br />

incorporation of up to 30% Mexican sunflower leaf<br />

meal in the diets of sheep to replace Wheat bran<br />

was adequate for lactation.<br />

Table 6: Reproductive performance of WAD ewe fed MSLM based diets<br />

Parameters<br />

A(0%MSLM) B(15%MSLM) C(30%MSLM) D(45%MSLM) SEM<br />

Initial wt before growth trial (kg) 14.10 14.00 14.30 14.00 2.78<br />

Wt at mating (kg) 17.63 17.50 17.88 17.50 3.48<br />

Wt at parturition (kg) 23.23 26.03 24.45 22.80 3.95<br />

Wt after parturition (kg) 19.80 22.46 20.85 19.50 3.59<br />

Gestation length (days) 150.00 149.50 150.50 150.00 0.82<br />

Lamb birth wt(kg) 1.65 1.80 1.80 1.59 0.38<br />

Wt loss during parturition (kg) 3.43 3.57 3.60 3.30 0.42<br />

Wt gain during pregnancy (kg) 5.60 8.53 6.58 5.30 0.97<br />

Wt of dam at mid lactation (kg) 18.80 21.46 19.50 18.43 3.41<br />

Wt of dam at weaning (kg) 17.80 20.66 19.00 17.60 3.27<br />

Wt changes during lactation (kg) -2.00 -1.80 -1.85 -1.90 0.40<br />

SEM: Standard error of mean<br />

References<br />

AFRC (1992). Agricultural and Food Research Council.<br />

Technical Committee on Response to nutrients. Rep. No.<br />

9 Nutritive requirements of ruminant animals: Protein<br />

Nutri. Abstr. Rev. Ser. B. Livest. Feeds Feeding 62: 787-<br />

835.<br />

AOAC (1990). Association of Official Analytical Chemists<br />

1970, Pennsylvania State University Press, University<br />

Park, PA, 467 pp.<br />

Freund G (ed.) (1996). Interets nutritionnel et dietetique du lait<br />

de chevre. Proceedings, Colloquium Le Lait de Cherve,<br />

Niort, Nov. 7, 1996, Institut. National de la Recherche<br />

Agronomique Publ., Paris, No. 81, 199 pp.<br />

Freund G (ed.) (2000). Goat Milk: Composition and<br />

Nutritional Value; Caprine Resources and<br />

Documentation Center of Institut. Technique des Produit<br />

Laitiers Caprins Publ., Surgeres, France, 78 pp.<br />

Gravert HO (1983). Die Milch. Verlag Eugen Ulmer,<br />

Stuttgart, 387 pp.<br />

IDF (1983). Production and Utilization of Goat’s and Ewe’s<br />

Milk. International Dairy Federation Publ., Brussels,<br />

Bul. No. 158, 72pp.<br />

IDF (1986). Production and Utilization of Goats and Ewe’s<br />

Milk Proceedings, IDF Seminar, Athens, Greece, Sept.<br />

23-25, 1985, International Dairy Federation Publ.,<br />

Brussels, Bul. No. 202, 222pp.<br />

IDF (1996). Production and Utilization of Ewe and Goat Milk.<br />

Proceedings, IDF Seminar, Crete, Greece, Oct. 19-21,<br />

1995. International Dairy Federation Publ., Brussels,<br />

346pp.<br />

King JWB (1988). directory of Current Research on Sheep<br />

and Goats. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux<br />

International Publ., Wallingford, Oxon, U.K. 271 pp.<br />

Kon SK, Cowie AT (1961). Milk: The Mammary Gland and<br />

its Secretion. Academic Press, New York, NY, 2 vol.,<br />

938pp.<br />

Kruip T, Werf JHJ, Vander-Wensing T, Groen AF (1996).<br />

Energy balance in early lactation of high producing dairy<br />

cows and its relation to reproduction, health and welfare.<br />

Proc. of the Wageningen Inst. Of Anim. Sci.<br />

Wageningen, Netherlands, 45-57, EAAP Publ. No.<br />

84:43.<br />

Le Lait (1993). Le Lait de chevre. Internat. J. Dairy Sci. and<br />

Technol. Le Lait 73: 405-628.<br />

official methods of Analysis, 15 th Ed. AOAC Inc.<br />

Arlington, Virginia USA.<br />

ARC (1985). Agricultural Research Council. The nutrient<br />

requirement of farm animals No.2 Ruminants: Tech Rev.<br />

and Summaries, ARC, London.<br />

Barje PP, Ehoche OW, Oyedipe EO, Agyemang K, Adu IF,<br />

Hailu Z, Rekwot PI (1999). Evaluate of pen-urban diary<br />

production systems in Nigeria: Results of the Diagnostic<br />

Survey phase, Final Report ILRRI, Ibadan.<br />

Bufano G, Dario C, Laudadio V (1996). The characterization<br />

of leccese sheep variations of chemical composition and<br />

lactodynamographic parameters in milk as related to<br />

somatic cell counts. In: Proceedings, International<br />

Symposium, Somatic Cells and Milk of Small Ruminants<br />

R. Rubino, Ed., Bella, Italy, Sept. 25-27, 1994,<br />

Wageningen Pers, EAAS Publ. No. 77, pp. 301 -304.<br />

Deepak S (1996). Buffalo Milk, Chemistry and Processing<br />

Technology. Shalini International Publication, Karnal,<br />

Haryana, India, 268 pp.<br />

Ekeocha AH (2009). Utilization of Mexican Sunflower<br />

(Tithonia diversifolia, Hemsley A. Gray) By the West<br />

African Dwarf Sheep. Ph.D Thesis, University of Ibadan,<br />

Ibadan, Nigeria, 224pp.<br />

Ekeocha AH, Fakolade P (2012). Studies on the<br />

physicochemical and Mineral Profile of Lactating West<br />

African Ewe fed Mexican Sunflower Leaf Meal Based<br />

Diets. J. Rec. Adv. Agri. 1 (4): 146 – 156.<br />

Falconer IR (1971). Lactation. Proceedings, International<br />

Symposium on Lactation, University of Nottingham,<br />

McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh JFD (1987). Animal<br />

732 J. Anim. Sci. Adv., 2012, 2(9):727-733


nutrition 4 th Ed. Longman Scientific and Technical. John<br />

Wiley and Sons. Inc. New York.<br />

Owen JB (1981). Sheep Production LPE pp. 195-235 Bailliese<br />

Tindall Publ. Cassell Ltd. London.<br />

Perea S, Labastida EF de, Najera AI, Chavarri F, Virto M,<br />

Renobales M de, Baron LJR (2000). Seasonal changes in<br />

the fat composition of Lacca sheep’s milk used for<br />

idiazabal cheese. Europ. Food Res. Technol. 210:318-<br />

323.<br />

Renner E (1982). Milk and Milk Products in Human Nutrition.<br />

Volkswirtschaftlicher Verlag GmbH Publ., Munich,<br />

Germany, 467 pp.<br />

SAS (1999). SAS/STAT Guide for personal computers.<br />

Version 6 S.A.S. Inst. Inc. Cary. New York, USA.<br />

Scott GE (1986). The Sheepman’s Production Handbook.<br />

Sheep Industry Development Program and American<br />

Sheep Producers Council Publ., Denver, C. O. 382 Pp.<br />

Serrano Rios M, Sastre A, Perez Juez MA, Estrala A,<br />

Sebastian C De Eds (1994). Proceedings, 1 st World<br />

Congress Dairy Production in Human Health and<br />

Nutrition, Madrid, June 7 – 10, 1993, A. A. Balkema<br />

Publ., Rotterdam, 447 Pp.<br />

Steele M (1996). Goats, the tropical Agriculturists. CTA<br />

publication. Macmillan pp. 9-21.<br />

Tarawali SA, Tarawali G, Larbi A, Harrison J (1995).<br />

Methods for the evaluation of forage-legume grasses,<br />

and fodder trees for use as livestock feed. ILRI Manual<br />

J. ILRI Nairobi Kenya. 7-15.<br />

Van Soest PJ (1963). Use of detergents in the analysis of<br />

fibrous feeds. 11. A rapid method for the determination<br />

of fibre and lignin. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 46: 829-<br />

835.<br />

Van Soest PJ, McQueen RE (1973). The chemistry and<br />

estimation of fibre. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 32: 123-127.<br />

EKEOCHA<br />

733 J. Anim. Sci. Adv., 2012, 2(9):727-733

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!