02.01.2014 Views

Agro-Biotechnology: - The Greens | European Free Alliance

Agro-Biotechnology: - The Greens | European Free Alliance

Agro-Biotechnology: - The Greens | European Free Alliance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

compared with those from healthy conventionally-bred animals.”<br />

<strong>The</strong>se conclusions were challenged by the Center for Food Safety. In their response<br />

to the EFSA opinion (cited from EFSA 2008b), the Center for Food Safety<br />

addresses some significant differences in the composition of meat and milk.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore it called for further investigations:<br />

“<strong>The</strong> significant differences in cloned milk composition revealed by these studies<br />

raise serious concerns about whether milk from clones is safe for human<br />

consumption. Without more data, and standards for which 'normal variations'<br />

in protein and fatty acid compositions of meat and milk are safe, any conclusions<br />

regarding the safety of food products derived from clones and their<br />

progeny are premature.”<br />

and:<br />

“In our opinion, this conclusion can be extended to the more general case,<br />

considering inter alia that the assessment of compositional analysis of meat<br />

and milk from clones is based on a few studies that, in general, analyse small<br />

samples.”<br />

In the discussion about food safety one should not loose sight of the fact that<br />

the EFSA (2008a) and the FDA (2008) mention a higher incidence of infections<br />

in cloned farm animals compared to those derived from conventional breeding.<br />

Thus products derived from those animals might also have a higher burden of<br />

infectious agents. For example, investigations were carried out to examine whether<br />

endogenous retrovirus (such as bovine endogenous retroviruses, BERV)<br />

are activated by the cloning process (EFSA, 2009). However the EFSA (2008a)<br />

raises some open questions in this context:<br />

“Should evidence become available of reduced immunocompetence of clones<br />

(...), it should be investigated whether, and if so, to what extent, consumption of<br />

meat and milk derived from clones or their offspring may lead to an increased<br />

human exposure to transmissible agents. ”<br />

Many questions remain unanswered since the number of investigations is low<br />

and the data presented are not generated according to any commonly approved<br />

guidelines. It seems premature to make judgements on the particular relevance<br />

of these observed differences to food safety.<br />

Further investigations are necessary to judge the safety of these products.<br />

Since effects depend on various factors such as the animal species, the protocols<br />

used for cloning and environmental effects, it will be difficult to come up<br />

with any comprehensive and final assessment.<br />

Food Safety | Cloned farm animals - a ‚killing application‘? | 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!